FBI lawyer: Hillary should have been indicted for her ‘Appalling’ mishandling of classified info

[Doc7505]

Former top FBI lawyer: Yes, Hillary should have been indicted for her ‘Appalling’ mishandling of classified info​

https://thenationalsentinel.com/2019...assified-info/
The FBI’s former top lawyer told a House committee during closed-door testimony that former secretary of state and 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton most definitely should have been indicted for mishandling classified information.
As reported by the Epoch Times, during testimony in October, Baker (above, center) told lawmakers that the bureau’s investigation into purposed “collusion” between the Trump campaign and Russia — Spygate — was “highly unusual” and replete with abnormalities.
“I had a jaundiced eye about everything, yes. I had skepticism about all this stuff. I was concerned about all of this. This whole situation was horrible, and it was novel and we were trying to figure out what to do, and it was highly unusual,” Baker told lawmakers, according to a transcript of his testimony obtained by the news site.
Baker’s response came after he was confronted with a series of procedural abnormalities, obvious bias, and omissions of evidence and key findings.
In October, The National Sentinel reported that Baker had offered lawmakers the FBI under then-Director James Comey engaged in “abnormal” handling of the investigation....
According to transcripts from Oct. 3 and Oct. 18 seen by the Epoch Times, Baker told lawmakers that, even up to the end of the Clinton investigation, he believed she should have been charged for her “alarming, appalling” mishandling of classified information.... The email marked “secret” was written by noted anti-Trump agent Peter Strzok, the bureau’s former No. 2 counterintelligence official who has since been fired. “Documents provided to the Committees show foreign actors obtained access to some of Mrs. Clinton’s emails — including at least one email classified ‘Secret,’” said the memo. — Jon Dougherty




~~~~~~
“Mishandle” is an awfully tame term for selling every goddamn national security secret that crossed her desk to the Chinese.
Former FBI agent James Baker said, "Yes, Hillary should have been indicted over ‘appalling’ mishandling of classified info. Hillary Clinton didn't "mishandle" classified information, she compromised every bit of it.
The irony of this is that, in covering up the Hillary's crimes, Obama assured the Democrats’ 2016 defeat. If she’d either been prosecuted or forced out of the contest for the nomination, another individual without her obvious, glaring weaknesses would have been nominated, giving them a far better chance to keep the presidency.
I’ve always wondered why, especially because the situation was so obvious. My only answer to it was, and remains, that the Clintons had, and must continue to have, a tremendous amount of highly damaging information about both of the Barry and Michelle was squeezed out of the Illinois bar of Law after only about four years of practice. Obama himself has totally obscured and concealed his dubious academic records using Perkins-Coie. Those records have been mostly in the custody of this ageing, bitter female, who would have been happy to spill the beans if she didn't get her way. In short, it looks like the Clintons blackmailed Obama into giving her the nomination, even though the likelihood of oncoming disaster was obvious.
The upshot to this massive blackmail of Obama only adds to the violation of law by the Clinton's has been the tremendous loss of revenue going into the Clinton Foundation(s) along with the loss of the presidency.
Will James Baker's testimong see more light of day? The biased MSM has made it their business to bury the truth....

 

[theHawk]

Well BJ made it clear to Loretta Lynch on the famous tarmac meeting that Hillary will not be charged, otherwise she might end up like Vince Foster. She in turn threatened Comey the Cuck and all other FBI/DoJ personnel, the message was clear: provide cover for the Queen or else.

 

[airplanemechanic]

But but but RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA!!!

Democrats had to coin a term that they could use to try to avoid discussing their own partys behavior.....WHATABOUTISM. When they point out crooked behavior by someone on the right and someone on right points the finger right back at someone in their party doing the same thing or worse, they don't want to talk about it. So they just call it "whataboutism" and dismiss it. Of course NEVER addressing their own parties behavior.

 

[BlindBoo]

The FBI has no evidence that Clinton's email server was ever hacked.

Even Baker admits that "ultimately he was persuaded to exonerate her."

 

[task0778]

The FBI has no evidence that Clinton's email server was ever hacked.

Even Baker admits that "ultimately he was persuaded to exonerate her."

Persuaded, yeah I'll bet he was persuaded. The Clintons made him an offer he couldn't refuse, go along with exoneration or your career is over.

Whether or not the Clinton's server was hacked or not is beside the point, which is that she had hundreds of official gov't business emails on that unprotected server, including classified information. And THAT is why she should have beeen indicted, and convicted.

 

[airplanemechanic]

The FBI has no evidence that Clinton's email server was ever hacked.

Even Baker admits that "ultimately he was persuaded to exonerate her."

Yes we know her server was hacked.

Clinton Emails: China Reportedly Hacked Her State Dept. Emails — Did The FBI Cover That Up, Too?

The chinese hacked her emails, embedded code and then got access to all of them.

Two officials from the Intelligence Community Inspector General's office discovered the code, and "met repeatedly with FBI officials to warn them of the Chinese intrusion,

 

[BlindBoo]

The FBI has no evidence that Clinton's email server was ever hacked.

Even Baker admits that "ultimately he was persuaded to exonerate her."

Yes we know her server was hacked.

Clinton Emails: China Reportedly Hacked Her State Dept. Emails — Did The FBI Cover That Up, Too?

The chinese hacked her emails, embedded code and then got access to all of them.

Two officials from the Intelligence Community Inspector General's office discovered the code, and "met repeatedly with FBI officials to warn them of the Chinese intrusion,

OH yeah it wasn't Russia that tried to Hack the DNC, it was China.

Is that you Donnie?

 

[JGalt]

But but but RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA!!!

Democrats had to coin a term that they could use to try to avoid discussing their own partys behavior.....WHATABOUTISM. When they point out crooked behavior by someone on the right and someone on right points the finger right back at someone in their party doing the same thing or worse, they don't want to talk about it. So they just call it "whataboutism" and dismiss it. Of course NEVER addressing their own parties behavior.

Exactly how did my own party "misbehave?

I mean compared to what Hillary, the DNC, and the Obama Administration got away with?

 

[H B Lowrie]

Don made about as much progress on locking her up with his 2 years and a majority in both houses as he did on his Wall.

Scamming the people?

 

[Oddball]

The FBI has no evidence that Clinton's email server was ever hacked.

Even Baker admits that "ultimately he was persuaded to exonerate her."

Cops don't get to make that decision, prosecutors do.

 

[H B Lowrie]

The FBI has no evidence that Clinton's email server was ever hacked.

Even Baker admits that "ultimately he was persuaded to exonerate her."

Cops don't get to make that decision, prosecutors do.

Apparently they haven't have they. Does Don understand this?

 

[Oddball]

The FBI has no evidence that Clinton's email server was ever hacked.

Even Baker admits that "ultimately he was persuaded to exonerate her."

Persuaded, yeah I'll bet he was persuaded. The Clintons made him an offer he couldn't refuse, go along with exoneration or your career is over.

Whether or not the Clinton's server was hacked or not is beside the point, which is that she had hundreds of official gov't business emails on that unprotected server, including classified information. And THAT is why she should have beeen indicted, and convicted.

 

[BlindBoo]

The FBI has no evidence that Clinton's email server was ever hacked.

Even Baker admits that "ultimately he was persuaded to exonerate her."

Cops don't get to make that decision, prosecutors do.

Lawyers do.

 

[Oddball]

The FBI has no evidence that Clinton's email server was ever hacked.

Even Baker admits that "ultimately he was persuaded to exonerate her."

Yes we know her server was hacked.

Clinton Emails: China Reportedly Hacked Her State Dept. Emails — Did The FBI Cover That Up, Too?

The chinese hacked her emails, embedded code and then got access to all of them.

Two officials from the Intelligence Community Inspector General's office discovered the code, and "met repeatedly with FBI officials to warn them of the Chinese intrusion,

 

[Oddball]

The FBI has no evidence that Clinton's email server was ever hacked.

Even Baker admits that "ultimately he was persuaded to exonerate her."

Cops don't get to make that decision, prosecutors do.

Lawyers do.

Comey's job wasn't as a lawyer.

 

[Claudette]

If anyone else had done what Hitlery did they would have been locked up.

 

[dudmuck]

Former top FBI lawyer: Yes, Hillary should have been indicted for her ‘Appalling’ mishandling of classified info​

https://thenationalsentinel.com/2019...assified-info/
The FBI’s former top lawyer told a House committee during closed-door testimony that former secretary of state and 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton most definitely should have been indicted for mishandling classified information.
As reported by the Epoch Times, during testimony in October, Baker (above, center) told lawmakers that the bureau’s investigation into purposed “collusion” between the Trump campaign and Russia — Spygate — was “highly unusual” and replete with abnormalities.
“I had a jaundiced eye about everything, yes. I had skepticism about all this stuff. I was concerned about all of this. This whole situation was horrible, and it was novel and we were trying to figure out what to do, and it was highly unusual,” Baker told lawmakers, according to a transcript of his testimony obtained by the news site.
Baker’s response came after he was confronted with a series of procedural abnormalities, obvious bias, and omissions of evidence and key findings.
In October, The National Sentinel reported that Baker had offered lawmakers the FBI under then-Director James Comey engaged in “abnormal” handling of the investigation....
According to transcripts from Oct. 3 and Oct. 18 seen by the Epoch Times, Baker told lawmakers that, even up to the end of the Clinton investigation, he believed she should have been charged for her “alarming, appalling” mishandling of classified information.... The email marked “secret” was written by noted anti-Trump agent Peter Strzok, the bureau’s former No. 2 counterintelligence official who has since been fired. “Documents provided to the Committees show foreign actors obtained access to some of Mrs. Clinton’s emails — including at least one email classified ‘Secret,’” said the memo. — Jon Dougherty




~~~~~~
“Mishandle” is an awfully tame term for selling every goddamn national security secret that crossed her desk to the Chinese.
Former FBI agent James Baker said, "Yes, Hillary should have been indicted over ‘appalling’ mishandling of classified info. Hillary Clinton didn't "mishandle" classified information, she compromised every bit of it.
The irony of this is that, in covering up the Hillary's crimes, Obama assured the Democrats’ 2016 defeat. If she’d either been prosecuted or forced out of the contest for the nomination, another individual without her obvious, glaring weaknesses would have been nominated, giving them a far better chance to keep the presidency.
I’ve always wondered why, especially because the situation was so obvious. My only answer to it was, and remains, that the Clintons had, and must continue to have, a tremendous amount of highly damaging information about both of the Barry and Michelle was squeezed out of the Illinois bar of Law after only about four years of practice. Obama himself has totally obscured and concealed his dubious academic records using Perkins-Coie. Those records have been mostly in the custody of this ageing, bitter female, who would have been happy to spill the beans if she didn't get her way. In short, it looks like the Clintons blackmailed Obama into giving her the nomination, even though the likelihood of oncoming disaster was obvious.
The upshot to this massive blackmail of Obama only adds to the violation of law by the Clinton's has been the tremendous loss of revenue going into the Clinton Foundation(s) along with the loss of the presidency.
Will James Baker's testimong see more light of day? The biased MSM has made it their business to bury the truth....

You had control of all 3 branches for two years, and you did what?

 

[airplanemechanic]

We know that meme isn't true. Everyone related to Hillary in any way is either never indicted or never seen alive again.

 

[task0778]

Former top FBI lawyer: Yes, Hillary should have been indicted for her ‘Appalling’ mishandling of classified info​

https://thenationalsentinel.com/2019...assified-info/
The FBI’s former top lawyer told a House committee during closed-door testimony that former secretary of state and 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton most definitely should have been indicted for mishandling classified information.
As reported by the Epoch Times, during testimony in October, Baker (above, center) told lawmakers that the bureau’s investigation into purposed “collusion” between the Trump campaign and Russia — Spygate — was “highly unusual” and replete with abnormalities.
“I had a jaundiced eye about everything, yes. I had skepticism about all this stuff. I was concerned about all of this. This whole situation was horrible, and it was novel and we were trying to figure out what to do, and it was highly unusual,” Baker told lawmakers, according to a transcript of his testimony obtained by the news site.
Baker’s response came after he was confronted with a series of procedural abnormalities, obvious bias, and omissions of evidence and key findings.
In October, The National Sentinel reported that Baker had offered lawmakers the FBI under then-Director James Comey engaged in “abnormal” handling of the investigation....
According to transcripts from Oct. 3 and Oct. 18 seen by the Epoch Times, Baker told lawmakers that, even up to the end of the Clinton investigation, he believed she should have been charged for her “alarming, appalling” mishandling of classified information.... The email marked “secret” was written by noted anti-Trump agent Peter Strzok, the bureau’s former No. 2 counterintelligence official who has since been fired. “Documents provided to the Committees show foreign actors obtained access to some of Mrs. Clinton’s emails — including at least one email classified ‘Secret,’” said the memo. — Jon Dougherty




~~~~~~
“Mishandle” is an awfully tame term for selling every goddamn national security secret that crossed her desk to the Chinese.
Former FBI agent James Baker said, "Yes, Hillary should have been indicted over ‘appalling’ mishandling of classified info. Hillary Clinton didn't "mishandle" classified information, she compromised every bit of it.
The irony of this is that, in covering up the Hillary's crimes, Obama assured the Democrats’ 2016 defeat. If she’d either been prosecuted or forced out of the contest for the nomination, another individual without her obvious, glaring weaknesses would have been nominated, giving them a far better chance to keep the presidency.
I’ve always wondered why, especially because the situation was so obvious. My only answer to it was, and remains, that the Clintons had, and must continue to have, a tremendous amount of highly damaging information about both of the Barry and Michelle was squeezed out of the Illinois bar of Law after only about four years of practice. Obama himself has totally obscured and concealed his dubious academic records using Perkins-Coie. Those records have been mostly in the custody of this ageing, bitter female, who would have been happy to spill the beans if she didn't get her way. In short, it looks like the Clintons blackmailed Obama into giving her the nomination, even though the likelihood of oncoming disaster was obvious.
The upshot to this massive blackmail of Obama only adds to the violation of law by the Clinton's has been the tremendous loss of revenue going into the Clinton Foundation(s) along with the loss of the presidency.
Will James Baker's testimong see more light of day? The biased MSM has made it their business to bury the truth....

You had control of all 3 branches for two years, and you did what?

None of which have anything to do with Trump or his 2016 campaign.

 

[DandyDonovan]

Former top FBI lawyer: Yes, Hillary should have been indicted for her ‘Appalling’ mishandling of classified info​

https://thenationalsentinel.com/2019...assified-info/
The FBI’s former top lawyer told a House committee during closed-door testimony that former secretary of state and 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton most definitely should have been indicted for mishandling classified information.
As reported by the Epoch Times, during testimony in October, Baker (above, center) told lawmakers that the bureau’s investigation into purposed “collusion” between the Trump campaign and Russia — Spygate — was “highly unusual” and replete with abnormalities.
“I had a jaundiced eye about everything, yes. I had skepticism about all this stuff. I was concerned about all of this. This whole situation was horrible, and it was novel and we were trying to figure out what to do, and it was highly unusual,” Baker told lawmakers, according to a transcript of his testimony obtained by the news site.
Baker’s response came after he was confronted with a series of procedural abnormalities, obvious bias, and omissions of evidence and key findings.
In October, The National Sentinel reported that Baker had offered lawmakers the FBI under then-Director James Comey engaged in “abnormal” handling of the investigation....
According to transcripts from Oct. 3 and Oct. 18 seen by the Epoch Times, Baker told lawmakers that, even up to the end of the Clinton investigation, he believed she should have been charged for her “alarming, appalling” mishandling of classified information.... The email marked “secret” was written by noted anti-Trump agent Peter Strzok, the bureau’s former No. 2 counterintelligence official who has since been fired. “Documents provided to the Committees show foreign actors obtained access to some of Mrs. Clinton’s emails — including at least one email classified ‘Secret,’” said the memo. — Jon Dougherty




~~~~~~
“Mishandle” is an awfully tame term for selling every goddamn national security secret that crossed her desk to the Chinese.
Former FBI agent James Baker said, "Yes, Hillary should have been indicted over ‘appalling’ mishandling of classified info. Hillary Clinton didn't "mishandle" classified information, she compromised every bit of it.
The irony of this is that, in covering up the Hillary's crimes, Obama assured the Democrats’ 2016 defeat. If she’d either been prosecuted or forced out of the contest for the nomination, another individual without her obvious, glaring weaknesses would have been nominated, giving them a far better chance to keep the presidency.
I’ve always wondered why, especially because the situation was so obvious. My only answer to it was, and remains, that the Clintons had, and must continue to have, a tremendous amount of highly damaging information about both of the Barry and Michelle was squeezed out of the Illinois bar of Law after only about four years of practice. Obama himself has totally obscured and concealed his dubious academic records using Perkins-Coie. Those records have been mostly in the custody of this ageing, bitter female, who would have been happy to spill the beans if she didn't get her way. In short, it looks like the Clintons blackmailed Obama into giving her the nomination, even though the likelihood of oncoming disaster was obvious.
The upshot to this massive blackmail of Obama only adds to the violation of law by the Clinton's has been the tremendous loss of revenue going into the Clinton Foundation(s) along with the loss of the presidency.
Will James Baker's testimong see more light of day? The biased MSM has made it their business to bury the truth....

Another article that confuses OPINION with FACT

Yes , it is a fact that Clinton broke the law, but saying "she should have been arrested " Is an OPINION . Just as saying "no she shouldn't have been arrested"

This is what pisses me off about liberals, they confuse opinion with fact, and so I MUST be upset when others do it a well. What with having principles and all.