Fauci Dismisses Science From Mayo Clinic

[Lesh]

When asked if this indicated that individuals should seek a Moderna dose for the booster shot, Fauci disagreed.

What if the study is correct?

What if you actually have a brain?

 

[Lesh]

why is peer review with people who agree with the presenter? why not invite someone with an opposing view in and have them bless the paper. Science isn't Peer Review. Sorry for all you stupid jamokes.

That’s some of the dumbest shit you ever posted and you have posted a lot of dumb shit

 

[HappyJoy]

I've said many times that I believe Fauci is compromised and this enforces that idea.

It doesn't though.

What do you think someone in Fauci's role should have said about the study? Understanding that it's not in a position or has gone through the rigor of peer review. Should he have said "Yeah, you might want to skip the Pfizer vaccine in favor of Moderna"? Do you think that would be helpful right now?

 

[pknopp]

It doesn't though.

What do you think someone in Fauci's role should have said about the study?

I've already answered this.

 

[HappyJoy]

OP won't tell you from the article, that the study isn't peer reviewed.

Apparently that doesn't mean anything anymore.

 

[HappyJoy]

I've already answered this.

Your answer was "argue that it needs more research"? The very first thing he said was ""That study … is a pre-print study, it hasn’t been fully peer-reviewed,"

I mean, what more do you want?

 

[Lesh]

Your answer was "argue that it needs more research"? The very first thing he said was ""That study … is a pre-print study, it hasn’t been fully peer-reviewed,"

I mean, what more do you want?

They just want to attack Fauci.

 

[pknopp]

Your answer was "argue that it needs more research"? The very first thing he said was ""That study … is a pre-print study, it hasn’t been fully peer-reviewed,"

I mean, what more do you want?

I answered this already.

 

[pknopp]

They just want to attack Fauci.

He argued a pandemic wasn't too high of a price to pay for doing this research. I believe he should be slammed for that.

Do you believe it is?

 

[HappyJoy]

I answered this already.

I know and you answer sounds a lot like a portion of what Fauci had said.

 

[Rigby5]

Peer review is what laypersons need in order to be able to tell what is right when it is beyond their scope of knowledge.
But experts do not need peer review.
They can tell by reading it, whether or not it is accurate.

 

[HappyJoy]

Peer review is what laypersons need in order to be able to tell what is right when it is beyond their scope of knowledge.
But experts do not need peer review.
They can tell by reading it, whether or not it is accurate.

And the experts who are reading this study, what are they saying? By the way, scrutiny is a cornerstone of science.

 

[Lesh]

He argued a pandemic wasn't too high of a price to pay for doing this research. I believe he should be slammed for that.

Do you believe it is?

Link and quote

 

[Lesh]

Peer review is what laypersons need in order to be able to tell what is right when it is beyond their scope of knowledge.
But experts do not need peer review.
They can tell by reading it, whether or not it is accurate.

More horse shit from the Kremlin troll that wants Americans to die

 

[pknopp]

Peer review is what laypersons need in order to be able to tell what is right when it is beyond their scope of knowledge.
But experts do not need peer review.
They can tell by reading it, whether or not it is accurate.

The Mayo Clinic isn't legit?

 

[HappyJoy]

Link and quote

I too would like a link and quote.

 

[pknopp]

Link and quote

I believe you know this already.

Fauci once argued for risky viral experiments — even if they can lead to pandemic

 

[HappyJoy]

The Mayo Clinic isn't legit?

I believe in this thread....you're on that side.

 

[danielpalos]

"That study … is a pre-print study, it hasn’t been fully peer-reviewed," Fauci said on CBS's "Face the Nation." "I don’t doubt what they’re seeing, but there are a lot of confounding variables in there, about when one was started, the relative amount of people in that cohort who were delta vs alpha – right now, if we get boosters … it’s clear we want to make sure we get people, if possible, to get the boost from the original vaccine."

 

[Lesh]

I believe you know this already.

Fauci once argued for risky viral experiments — even if they can lead to pandemic

“Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision? Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.”

He wrote that it was “more likely” that a pandemic would occur naturally and “the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.”

Gain-of-function experiments are the sort of work that was being conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology when the COVID-19 pandemic first started in China in late 2019.FeatureChina
However, he noted the scientific community “must respect that there are genuine and legitimate concerns about this type of research, both domestically and globally.”

“We cannot expect those who have these concerns to simply take us, the scientific community, at our word that the benefits of this work outweigh the risks, nor can we ignore their calls for greater transparency, their concerns about conflicts of interest, and their efforts to engage in a dialog about whether these experiments should have been performed in the first place,” Fauci wrote.

“Those of us in the scientific community who believe in the merits of this work have the responsibility to address these concerns thoughtfully and respectfully.”

Thoughtful and reasoned..

And there is NO evidence that such work caused this pandemic