Fauci Dismisses Science From Mayo Clinic

[jc456]

Well, you are correct that the vaccines were designed to work with the earlier variants, which is why they aren't very effective and stopping the spread of Delta. But, there is all kinds of evidence that, even with Delta, the vaccines are greatly reducing the number of hospitalizations and deaths.

They don’t know the variant make up to begin that process. It’s all speculation

 

[Independentthinker]

The weak nature of Delta has Far more to do with low death counts

But another variable is that a very huge majority of the most vulnerable have been vaccinated so that many of the Delta cases are among the more healthy crowd who do have less symptoms than those who died earlier on, such as tons of the elderly in nursing homes. So, that may be the reason and not that Delta is actually a less severe strain.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Lying COMMUNIST leftists in the USA only follow the science when it suits their goals for money and power.

THIS IS FROM THE WHO WEBSITE on 31 December 2020:

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Herd immunity, lockdowns and COVID-19

Updated 31 December 2020

www.who.int

"Large scale physical distancing measures and movement restrictions, often referred to as ‘lockdowns’, can slow COVID‑19 transmission by limiting contact between people.
However, these measures can have a profound negative impact on individuals, communities, and societies by bringing social and economic life to a near stop. Such measures disproportionately affect disadvantaged groups, including people in poverty, migrants, internally displaced people and refugees, who most often live in overcrowded and under resourced settings, and depend on daily labour for subsistence."


What happened to FOLLOW THE SCIENCE????

Leftist Communist Biden voters are totalitarian LIARS.

 

[excalibur]

What peer reviewed study has Fraudci done to come to his conclusion?

Peer review is a fraud anyway.

Publishing: The peer-review scam - Nature

When a handful of authors were caught reviewing their own papers, it exposed weaknesses in modern publishing systems. Editors are trying to plug the holes.

www.nature.com

107 cancer papers retracted due to peer review fraud

New papers were found through investigations into previous fraud.

arstechnica.com

 

[Adrenochrome Junkie]

If you know so damn much why are you wasting yer life on a message board?

Says the most opinionated poster with one of the highest post counts

 

[pknopp]

Of course they're not but the CDC isn't going to change positions every time a pre print comes out either. That would be completely schizophrenic.

As I said, I only expect him to not dismiss it.

 

[Lesh]

As I said, I only expect him to not dismiss it.

Fauci did NOT dismiss it. Go back and read the OP

 

[pknopp]

Fauci did NOT dismiss it. Go back and read the OP

I did read it.

Fauci dismisses study on delta efficacy ......................​

 

[WEATHER53]

I did read it.

Fauci dismisses study on delta efficacy ......................​

But….but…but you read the word dismiss incorrectly.

 

[HappyJoy]

As I said, I only expect him to not dismiss it.

He didn't dismiss it. He was pretty diplomatic about it.

"That study … is a pre-print study, it hasn’t been fully peer-reviewed," Fauci said on CBS's "Face the Nation." "I don’t doubt what they’re seeing, but there are a lot of confounding variables in there, about when one was started, the relative amount of people in that cohort who were delta vs alpha – right now, if we get boosters … it’s clear we want to make sure we get people, if possible, to get the boost from the original vaccine."

He didn't shit on it, didn't say if it were true or not only that there are still questions and this is but one non-peer reviewed study. Sounds like a reasonable answer.

 

[Lesh]

I did read it.

Fauci dismisses study on delta efficacy ......................​

Quote his own words

Thanks to the poster above who did

 

[pknopp]

Quote his own words

Thanks to the poster above who did

When asked if this indicated that individuals should seek a Moderna dose for the booster shot, Fauci disagreed.

What if the study is correct?

 

[HappyJoy]

When asked if this indicated that individuals should seek a Moderna dose for the booster shot, Fauci disagreed.

What if the study is correct?

It will be peer-reviewed and then if need be change directions based on that. I guess what you want Fauci to do is just agree to any and all pre-print studies that you deem correct even though your opinion and mine don't mean squat to the scientific community.

 

[pknopp]

It will be peer-reviewed and then if need be change directions based on that. I guess what you want Fauci to do is just agree to any and all pre-print studies that you deem correct even though your opinion and mine don't mean squat to the scientific community.

No, I simply don't want to see him just dismiss it before having all the information.

 

[HappyJoy]

No, I simply don't want to see him just dismiss it before having all the information.

OK, you mean like a peer-reviewed analysis?

 

[pknopp]

OK, you mean like a peer-reviewed analysis?

I don't trust anyone that says that the risk of a pandemic was worth the research he was funding.

 

[HappyJoy]

I don't trust anyone that says that the risk of a pandemic was worth the research he was funding.

^And that is what this is really about for you.

 

[jc456]

Peer review is a fraud anyway.

Publishing: The peer-review scam - Nature

When a handful of authors were caught reviewing their own papers, it exposed weaknesses in modern publishing systems. Editors are trying to plug the holes.

www.nature.com

107 cancer papers retracted due to peer review fraud

New papers were found through investigations into previous fraud.

arstechnica.com

why is peer review with people who agree with the presenter? why not invite someone with an opposing view in and have them bless the paper. Science isn't Peer Review. Sorry for all you stupid jamokes.

 

[pyetro]

OP won't tell you from the article, that the study isn't peer reviewed.

 

[pknopp]

^And that is what this is really about for you.

I've said many times that I believe Fauci is compromised and this enforces that idea.