The Notorious “catch and kill" campaign: Turning the National Enquirer into an arm of Trump's 2016 presidential campaign

[Hutch Starskey]

Still no statute, huh Simp?

Irrelevant.
It’s happening right in front of you, fool.
Hilarious to think that you see a path the defense attorneys don’t.

 

[para bellum]

At trial is the only place to address an indictment, dope.

That's just beyond stupid.

Why do you think there are pretrial motions?

 

[Yarddog]

IOW you’re helpless because you understand nothing?
Are you really so victimized?

I’m just staying the fact that the Republicans generally play right into their hands.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yes it does. That is clearly addressed in the ruling on the "sufficiency of charges" portion.

"The standard that is to be applied on a motion to dismiss an indictment due to legal insufficiency is "whether there was competent evidence which, if accepted as true, would establish every element of an offense charged and the defendant's commission thereof."

EVERY ELEMENT.

There are three elements to 175.10.
1. Intent to defraud
2. Falsification of records
3. Intent to commit the underlying crime

The judge spelled out all 3 elements in that ruling.

They cannot wait until trial to identify one or more of the elements. The underlying crimes were left out of the indictment, but were specified in the bill of particulars back in November. The judge disallowed one of them and allowed the other 3 to stand.

Trump could have saved a fortune if he had only hired you.
Who knew you were so brilliant?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

That's just beyond stupid.

Why do you think there are pretrial motions?

Which amounted to what in this case?

 

[Dante]

Really, have you not embarrassed yourself enough?

It was a challenge to the underlying crimes that were already known to the defense.

The requirements for the indictment I listed in post #410, which clearly shows you are totally full of shit in your claim that they can wait until trial to notify the defendant of the predicate crime- that is an element of the charge.

That would be easy grounds for a dismissal.

They were known to the defense? Then why was everybody arguing the predicate cries were unknown?

Dismissed. (there's your dismissal)

 

[lantern2814]

Nostradumbass getting it wrong yet again in twattrain45 suggestion 6.

So what's the underlying crime DOPE? Seems your boy Fat Alvin doesn't know what it is. Even though it's REQUIRED for him to even think about bringing a case. Which the FEC and DOJ declined to prosecute saying no campaign violation took place. After today's debacle, Fat Alvin would be best served to just drop this case before he embarrasses himself even more.

 

[struth]

So? You don't need one. You were shown the crimes.

Haha yes you need a statue

Wow

 

[Dante]

Ok, well wait. Those NY laws are a misdemeanor offense. They want to claim none of this is political? Yet they are going after an ex president. One who is running again on an expired misdemeanor offense ?

Seems to me this decisiveness by one political party is deciding and destroying our country. They can’t leave it for the voters to decide.

Pecker testified that Trump saw the exposure of the sex stuff as damaging to his chances of election, not as an embarrassment to his family. He doesn't give two shits about embarrassment -- He's The Donald. Who else in their right mind would walk around with that hairdo and that orange tan shit.

 

[para bellum]

Which amounted to what in this case?

They do several things. Most importantly they preserve the appeal. An appellate court will not reverse a decision on grounds that were not introduced at the lower court.

And in this case they eliminated one of the prosecution's theories of the underlying crime.

 

[surada]

Btw Faun did Hutchinson lie or not?

She wasn't there. She repeated what Tony Ornato told her.

 

[Dante]

She wasn't there. She repeated what Tony Ornato told her.

Fact.

 

[Dante]

Hilarious.
If you, or anyone for that matter, were within the “depth” that you suggest. Trump wouldn’t be knee deep in a criminal trial.

Bingo

 

[para bellum]

They were known to the defense? Then why was everybody arguing the predicate cries were unknown?

Dismissed. (there's your dismissal)

The defense lawyers are not going to publicize details, dipshit.

They obviously were, or they could not have challenged them in the pretrial motions.

The fact that the public was not aware does not mean mean the defense was as ignorant. In fact, anyone who followed the case closely should have read Merchan's February ruling, and they would have known two months ago.

 

[Dante]

The defense lawyers are not going to publicize details, dipshit.

They obviously were, or they could not have challenged them in the pretrial motions.

The fact that the public was not aware does not mean mean the defense was as ignorant. In fact, anyone who followed the case closely should have read Merchan's February ruling, and they would have known two months ago.

Fake News.

 

[para bellum]

Fake News.

Bahaha. How lame can you be?

The brief in support of the Omnibus motions that you posted is "fake news"?

Merchan's Febuary ruling is "fake news"?

New York laws on criminal procedure is "fake news"?

I have supported every single thing I said with court docs and statutes.

You should really stop embarrassing yourself, you lost bigly.

 

[Yarddog]

Bahaha. How lame can you be?

The brief in support of the Omnibus motions that you posted is "fake news"?

Merchan's Febuary ruling is "fake news"?

New York laws on criminal procedure is "fake news"?

I have supported every single thing I said with court docs and statutes.

You should really stop embarrassing yourself, you lost bigly.

Even if the jury comes out with. Guilty verdict, I’m sure this will be won by Trump on appeal, but political damage will still be done.

 

[para bellum]

Even if the jury comes out with. Guilty verdict, I’m sure this will be won by Trump on appeal, but political damage will still be done.

It doesn't seem to be hurting Trump in the polls. Biden is tanking, and Trump's numbers are only improving.

Everyone that's watching knows it's a political witch hunt anyway.

 

[konradv]

What statute?

All of them!

 

[Billiejeens]

Sorry, I was talking to people who can actually hold more than one thought in their heads at once.

So, not you.

Someone who shills for the orange pile of shit is a shill.

There is no one like that.