If I wasn't paying attention, this might be a fairly good attempt at deflection.
You see, I already asked YOU several times what you suggest we do about these murderous "crazy assholes" as you called them.
You have thus far avoided a reply, yet now you bounce the question back at me. Deflection is what that is called.
Ok.
I think we should be able to track guns more efficiently. I'd like to prevent the sale of guns without a background check. If this guy bought his gun from someone else, then we need to know who sold him that gun and we can hold that person accountable.
There's one of my suggestions. And don't worry about responding to it because I already know exactly where it's going to go. You disagree.
Great. So there's my idea. You disagree with it. We accomplished nothing. Can we fast-forward past this part now? It's not helpful and it gets extremely repetitive.
Notice that I have a suggestion. You don't like it, but I have one. So now it's your turn.
Prove me wrong. Tell me what you think should be done to help prevent incidents like this.
Do you understand the purpose and beauty of the 2nd Amendment?
If government is empowered to track every gun, then it is also empowered to track down resistance in case it goes rouge / tyrannical.
I have a feeling you would believe neither would be possible, but men FAR wiser than you could ever hope to be set up that for a reason.
Your suggestions (like all hoplophobes) ALWAYS see the gun as the problem.
Never the criminal who uses it.
That is so fucked up I refuse to argue with you.
Great. We disagree. Just like I predicted. We accomplished nothing. Just like I predicted. Now can we move past that stupid detour that you insisted on?
Your statement: "Show me where I ever said nothing should be done."
Prove me wrong. Tell me what you think should be done to help prevent incidents like this.
You claimed I was deflecting because I wouldn't offer a suggestion. I told you it wouldn't be helpful because we'll disagree on it anyway. But at least I have a suggestion.
What's yours?
Correct.......our thinking is vastly different.
You believe guns commit crimes against people and need more control.
I believe bad people commit crimes with guns and those people need more control.
Crazy, right? It's almost like we disagree on this. Who could have possibly predicted that? It's mind-boggling.
Now then, what's your suggestion?
Your statement: "Show me where I ever said nothing should be done."
My response: Prove me wrong. Show me what you think should be done.
Ok, if you can't debate without childish sarcasm then debate yourself
You aren't even understanding the point here.
Are you being stupid?
I've said at least 4 times that Democrat polices need changing.
Democrat policies that release dangerous criminals back onto the streets due to covid19. How incredibly harmful to society.
Democrat policies that allow violent criminals to be release without bail.
Democrat policies that allow rioting and looting to go on for over 100 days in Portland and other Democrat cities.
Are you even being serious at all?
GUNS DO NOT COMMIT CRIMES......criminals do. Why not go after the criminals instead of the guns? (You have no answer)