Understood. Let's throw caution to the wind and try it anyway, and devil take the hindmost. Let's put it to the test and see whether that's actually true or not.
Because the last 50 times it was tried and failed didn't convince you?
A fundamental grasp of market economics is severely lacking in this nation.
I wasn't talking about raising the minimum wage.
I was talking about letting the fast food workers organize and force higher wages within their narrow sector.
I have an average layman's / yoeman's grasp of action-and-reaction in a market economy, having taken a couple of macro-economics courses a thousand years ago, and claim no particular insight or expertise.
What I DO see, however, is a market-sector that benefits greatly from near-slave-wages - worker-bees whose shelter and care must be subsidized on the public dole - and I'm willing to experiment with a market-segment like that, to see if such answers can bring some relief to that lot, without triggering a substantive domino-effect elsewhere.
If it gets 'em out of subsidized housing and off Medicaid and food stamps and all that, then, it might prove worth the risk.
Because things sure-as-hell aren't gonna get any better for such folk (
or for the taxpaying public that has to carry their water for them) by continuing to rely upon laissez faire priniciples...
Sometimes, doing nothing is better than doing the wrong thing...
And sometimes, doing nothing is worse than doing the wrong thing or an uncertain thing...
I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that we are looking at a case of the latter here (do
something) rather than the former...
Intervention is oftentimes the wrong answer...
But sometimes...