My goodness. Moses did not write the first 11 chapters of Genes or the accounts of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
They were not revealed to him by God. They were accounts that had been passed down orally.
Sure, puppy, whatever you say.
Sorry to be the one to break this to you but the earth wasn’t created 6,000 years ago either.
My goodness. Moses did not write the first 11 chapters of Genes or the accounts of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
They were not revealed to him by God. They were accounts that had been passed down orally.
Sure, puppy, whatever you say.
Sorry to be the one to break this to you but the earth wasn’t created 6,000 years ago either.
what did Jesus say about that?
He said die to self and confront reality.
oh----you think that the crucifixion thing was
"SUICIDE BY ROMAN"?
Not exactly what I was saying, Rosie.
But thanks for playing.
you wrote that Jesus said "DIE" to himself "AND CONFRONT
REALITY" What did you mean by that comment? Do you have
any idea what YOU MEANT? According to the science called
Psychiatry-----workers in that field seem to agree that suicide is
a matter of extreme unhappiness and anger. It is an "aggression
against self by a person who feels unable to act aggressively to
those or that which aggrieves him. Can you explain YOUR COMMENT?
He didn’t really say it, Rosie.
It was more of a living parable. And it’s not meant to be read literally. All major religions teach to die to self. It’s how we see reality.
"a living parable" ??? OH----you seem to be struggling to claim
that the crucifixion was an ALLEGORY of that to which "all"
religious leaders and icons strive. Jesus wanted to "die to self...?
something like BUDDHA. So he was an ordinary man seeking
NIRVANA thru death..... ok ---------weird but if that is what
you want.....fine with me. It does not seem to me to be the classical
sunday school approach
It’s probably easier for you to put words in my mouth. But that just means you are arguing with yourself.
It is CLEARLY easier for you to express words which make no sense, even to you.
If that’s how you need to see it, more power to you.
You have declined to explain your own words. I commented on
that fact. You are reduced to more babble. So far you have evaded a very simple task which is that you explain why you refer to
the crucifixion of Jesus--------which was LIKELY an historic event based on the history of that place at that time under brutal roman
oppression, as an ALLEGORY. Are you suggesting that it did not really HAPPEN? If so, why do you think that the ROMAN CHURCH decided to magnify it into an EVENT of extreme importance for the entire world? Christian women and men still walk around
with crosses as an "IMPORTANT" symbol of a religion------but it is
only an allegory?. As to the tens or even hundreds of thousands
of people crucified by Roman authorities------were those events ALSO "allegorical"?