The report was pretty clear that they didn’t have evidence to charge Trump for conspiracy. When it came to obstruction they obviously did have evidence to credibly accuse the president however decided to follow the directive not allowing the DOJ to accuse or indict a sitting president so he laid out the facts and is leaving up to Congress.
We can look forward then to Nadler impeaching Trump for obstruction.
We can then look forward to seeing the impeachment die in the senate.
As far as that directive see my NY Times article on that. I haven't been able to find any mention of that official we do not indict the president directive anywhere.
If there was no evidence of obstruction he would have cleared him like he did with the conspiracy accusations. This isn’t hard to understand and it’s not a partisan analysis. What I just laid out is exactly what happened. I don’t see how you can contest it without attempting to do a political spin job
No one can credibly make a case for obstruction.
There was no obstruction. No one stopped Mueller from taking his time and doing his job.
You need to get a dictionary and find out what obstruction is.