You don't see anything you would consider a lie from Trump?! Are you joking?
How about when he said Muellers report said “No collusion, No Obstruction, Total vindication” none of which the mueller report says. It doesn’t get more black and white than that

No obstruction and no collusion. Not charged with either one.
Obviously from Trump's perspective he is vindicated. That you disagree with his opinion does not make it a lie.
Yes I realize that’s how he is spinning it... but we are talking about lies and truth and to say the report says something that it doesn’t (No obstruction) is a straight up lie.
Please take a minute to read this which shows exactly what mueller said in his report regarding obstruction...
What the Mueller Report Says About Obstruction - FactCheck.org
In the hours after the public release of the redacted report from special counsel Robert S. Mueller, President Donald Trump took to Twitter with
a message that reads, in part, “NO OBSTRUCTION!”
That’s not at all what
the Mueller reportsays, though.
“Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian-interference and obstruction investigations,” Mueller wrote. “The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General’s recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony.”
Mueller, however, refrained from recommending prosecution, saying that there were “difficult [legal] issues that would need to be resolved,” in order to reach a conclusion that the crime of obstruction of justice was committed by Trump.
Factoring into his decision not to weigh in on prosecution, Mueller wrote, was an opinion issued by the Office of Legal Counsel finding that “the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions” in violation of “the constitutional separation of powers.”
“Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President’s conduct,” Mueller wrote.
Mueller emphasized, however, that his analysis of the evidence did not clear the president of obstruction. Said Mueller: “
f we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment.”