Exposed: Another Orchestrated DNC Funded COUP to Thwart Democracy!

[AZGAL]

the CIA and Ford? link?

 

[The Original Tree]

the CIA and Ford? link?

Read much?

Apparently not.

 

[Crepitus]

 

[Skylar]

Here is the run down on Ford and why this whole thing was a charade that not even The FBI will look at. Bet if Comey was running the show, they would though.

Let's just start with some inconsistencies in her statements vs. her life.

Claims she is so fearful of other people that she rarely goes out in Public:
Attends Leftist Anti Trump Marches. Wears Pussy Hats, marches, carries signs and is frequently in large crowds at these gatherings.

She claims for some weird reason that she has a second door installed at her home for security reasons because she was so afraid of others.

The second door is actually a separate entrance in to her home so she can host "Google Interns" and they can ingress and egress the space. So afraid of strangers yet has them in her home every day.

So afraid of her attacker that she repeatedly would say hi to Judge whenever she saw him. She stated she saw him out a few times, the exchanges were friendly and she initiated each one. Only the last time she saw him, she claimed his face turned white. If that were true, then it's because he recognized her as a nut case.

Claims she has a phobia of flying, yet files all over the world, and flew to this hearing. She doesn't know who paid for her ticket, but she flew to this hearing, and had no issues with her alleged phobia.

She claims she was completely unaware that The Committee offered to fly out to California and interview her privately to protect her from Public Scrutiny. I don't believe this at all. The Democrats wanted a "Public Hearing" so they could grandstand and publicly tear Kavenaugh apart and humiliate him. Grassely and the American Public was conned in to having to endure a public hearing. It was common knowledge that The Committee offered to fly out to her.

Claims that she does not know who paid for her lie detector test which incidentally consisted of just two questions, despite the Lie Detector Expert spending over 4 hours with her. The test was conducted in a Hotel Room too, which is odd, since there was no reason for this to not be done in her home. And the so called test was conducted weeks in advance of anyone knowing anything about this except Feinstein. She doesn't know who paid for the Hotel Room. The Lie Detector Expert wasn't interviewing her, he was coaching her on how to beat a lie detector test. The test was conducted at a Hotel, because they did not want anyone seeing such a person come to her home. Her and Feinstein refuse to show the results of the lie detector test or even reveal what 2 questions were asked.

She claims that Kavenaugh was pinned her down and was trying to remove her clothes on a bed. She stated however that she was wearing her bathing suit from diving practice all day that day. Since when does any woman refer to a full piece bathing suit as 'clothes'? And what woman, conscience of hygiene and her appearance, would wear a bathing suit all day and show up at a party in a bathing suit which she called "clothes"? People who participate in such sports always shower after practice, and change in to street clothes, and place their suit in a bag.

She doesn't know who invited her to this party or who gave her a ride to the party or exactly where it was, or whose home it was in. Neither does she know the actual month, the year or the day of the week the party occurred. Contrast this with Kavenaugh and his activity calendar where he can account for his whereabouts ever day for that entire summer. She lives 10 miles from the general area that she said this occured in, and said she left the party and went home. Yet, she can't recall how she got home. Did she walk 10 miles in a bathing suit? And nobody saw her? Again, she is being intentionally vague.

She stated that after the alleged attack that her attacker was going to be a Supreme Court Justice some day. Anybody with a brain has to have a WTF moment. What 15 year old girl would ever say that after having a traumatic experience like she claims? And why cannot she remember any details except that she was sure 100% that Kavenaugh is who did it? She claims that the memory of that day was indeliable....but can't remember a damn thing about it.

She claims in one statement 2 people were there, and in another 4 people were there, and in a third statement 6 people were at the party. Yet no one she names has come forward to say such a party existed, or happened. She claims she told her therapist, and that what she said should be in the therapist notes. Yet, she and Feinstein refuse to produce, said notes.

Her own parents refused to attend the hearing to support her, and when interviewed stated that they do not believe she was ever a victim of sexual abuse. If your daughter or my daughter were going to be on National TV enduring a hearing regarding sexual assault, you bet damn well we'd be there to support her.

She has high priced attorneys directly connected to the Leftist Women's movement, yet doesn't know how she got in touch with them, or who paid them. They piped up and said they are working Pro Bono. I have to ask why they are even involved in this. Why does she need an attorney at all actually. Her attorney is on retainer for George Soros, and works also for The Democrat party. They are getting paid to do these kinds of things....they just aren't getting paid by her.

Claims she wasn't politically motivated, but yet posted on Social Media that someone should accuse Gorsich of Sexual Harassment to stop him from taking the bench. She deleted a ton of Anti Trump Social Media Posts prior to 'coming forward'

She claims she wanted to remain anonymous when she wrote her letter. Yet weeks before she was "revealed" to The Public, she already had a DNC Attorney Katz assigned to her, had a lie detector expert meet with her to coach her, and had media according to her at her home, contacting her at work and trying to pressure her to come forward before anyone knew her name. She also claims that someone hacked in to her email account and sent out emails about this weeks prior to anyone knowing who the Hell she was.

How did "The Media" get a copy of this letter, if Feinstein's office was the only one who had it? It was an intentional leak.

So I have to ask people with a brain. Do you have a brain? This was never intended to be anonymous. Feinstein and The Dems held on to this, prepared since July to unleash this mentally disturbed pawn on Kavenaugh to stop the Confirmation process from going forward.

She has Phd yet does not know what the word "exculpatory" means?

She claims that the event left an indelible memory upon her, yet cannot remember anything about it except that Kavenaugh and Judge jumped on her on the bed rolled off and started wrestling with each other, completely ignoring her. That's how interested they were in assaulting her?

She claims they turned up the music really loud in the bedroom so no one could hear her. Exactly why do you need to cover up someone's mouth then if the music was so loud no one could hear what was going on?

The other so called accusers also all have very vague stories, all are involved in Liberal Women's Organizations, and all have refused to give sworn testimony to their flimsy allegations.

Kavenaugh claims he was a virgin until he met his wife and got married. Why hasn't one woman came forward and claimed he is not a virgin? Because Kavenaugh is telling the truth, and like with his calendar that proves his whereabouts on the summer in question, he'd be able to out any potential liars and easily refute their claims.

If this wasn't a DNC funded political smear job, then why is Joe Biden's attorney involved? Why is Michael Avenatti involved? Why is Andrew McCabe's Attorney involved? And why is Katz representing her when she is on retainer with both Soros and The DNC? And why would Katz have to meet with Hillary Clinton to discuss any of this?

If I have missed anything, please feel free to chime in.

You keep throwing the word 'coup' around. And you've yet to use it correctly.

Ford's account precedes the hearings by about half a decade. Her account precedes Trump even announcing his presidency. Eliminating politics as a likely motive.....as why would she make politically motivated accusations against Kavanaugh in 2012? And then only tell her therapist, her husband and her friends?

Your narrative simply makes no sense.

Ford also passed a polygraph test that put the odds of her being deceptive at 0.05%. False rape accustions are also exceedingly rare......generally found to be less than 1 in 20. With most sexual assaults going unreported.

And Ford's testimony was very compelling and credible. And I'm not the only one who thinks so:

"This was extremely emotional, extremely raw, and extremely credible,” Wallace said during an appearance on Fox News during a brief Senate Judiciary Committee recess.

“Nobody could listen to her deliver those words and talk about the assault and the impact it had had on her life and not have your heart go out to her,” the "Fox News Sunday" host continued. “She obviously was traumatized by an event.”

“This is a disaster for the Republicans,” Wallace added.

Chris Wallace: Ford's testimony is 'a disaster for the Republicans'

And Chris Wallace was hardly alone:

Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano said on the same panel with Wallace that Ford came across as an "exceptionally credible" witness.

Chris Wallace: Ford's testimony is 'a disaster for the Republicans'

In your conspiractorial fantaticism, you can't see what the rest of us could: Ford was a credible, sympathetic witness relaying something that was deeply painful for her.

 

[BookShaka]

If she can’t say which year it happened how does Kavanaugh have a record of what he did during the summer in question?

 

[BookShaka]

Here is the run down on Ford and why this whole thing was a charade that not even The FBI will look at. Bet if Comey was running the show, they would though.

Let's just start with some inconsistencies in her statements vs. her life.

Claims she is so fearful of other people that she rarely goes out in Public:
Attends Leftist Anti Trump Marches. Wears Pussy Hats, marches, carries signs and is frequently in large crowds at these gatherings.

She claims for some weird reason that she has a second door installed at her home for security reasons because she was so afraid of others.

The second door is actually a separate entrance in to her home so she can host "Google Interns" and they can ingress and egress the space. So afraid of strangers yet has them in her home every day.

So afraid of her attacker that she repeatedly would say hi to Judge whenever she saw him. She stated she saw him out a few times, the exchanges were friendly and she initiated each one. Only the last time she saw him, she claimed his face turned white. If that were true, then it's because he recognized her as a nut case.

Claims she has a phobia of flying, yet files all over the world, and flew to this hearing. She doesn't know who paid for her ticket, but she flew to this hearing, and had no issues with her alleged phobia.

She claims she was completely unaware that The Committee offered to fly out to California and interview her privately to protect her from Public Scrutiny. I don't believe this at all. The Democrats wanted a "Public Hearing" so they could grandstand and publicly tear Kavenaugh apart and humiliate him. Grassely and the American Public was conned in to having to endure a public hearing. It was common knowledge that The Committee offered to fly out to her.

Claims that she does not know who paid for her lie detector test which incidentally consisted of just two questions, despite the Lie Detector Expert spending over 4 hours with her. The test was conducted in a Hotel Room too, which is odd, since there was no reason for this to not be done in her home. And the so called test was conducted weeks in advance of anyone knowing anything about this except Feinstein. She doesn't know who paid for the Hotel Room. The Lie Detector Expert wasn't interviewing her, he was coaching her on how to beat a lie detector test. The test was conducted at a Hotel, because they did not want anyone seeing such a person come to her home. Her and Feinstein refuse to show the results of the lie detector test or even reveal what 2 questions were asked.

She claims that Kavenaugh was pinned her down and was trying to remove her clothes on a bed. She stated however that she was wearing her bathing suit from diving practice all day that day. Since when does any woman refer to a full piece bathing suit as 'clothes'? And what woman, conscience of hygiene and her appearance, would wear a bathing suit all day and show up at a party in a bathing suit which she called "clothes"? People who participate in such sports always shower after practice, and change in to street clothes, and place their suit in a bag.

She doesn't know who invited her to this party or who gave her a ride to the party or exactly where it was, or whose home it was in. Neither does she know the actual month, the year or the day of the week the party occurred. Contrast this with Kavenaugh and his activity calendar where he can account for his whereabouts ever day for that entire summer. She lives 10 miles from the general area that she said this occured in, and said she left the party and went home. Yet, she can't recall how she got home. Did she walk 10 miles in a bathing suit? And nobody saw her? Again, she is being intentionally vague.

She stated that after the alleged attack that her attacker was going to be a Supreme Court Justice some day. Anybody with a brain has to have a WTF moment. What 15 year old girl would ever say that after having a traumatic experience like she claims? And why cannot she remember any details except that she was sure 100% that Kavenaugh is who did it? She claims that the memory of that day was indeliable....but can't remember a damn thing about it.

She claims in one statement 2 people were there, and in another 4 people were there, and in a third statement 6 people were at the party. Yet no one she names has come forward to say such a party existed, or happened. She claims she told her therapist, and that what she said should be in the therapist notes. Yet, she and Feinstein refuse to produce, said notes.

Her own parents refused to attend the hearing to support her, and when interviewed stated that they do not believe she was ever a victim of sexual abuse. If your daughter or my daughter were going to be on National TV enduring a hearing regarding sexual assault, you bet damn well we'd be there to support her.

She has high priced attorneys directly connected to the Leftist Women's movement, yet doesn't know how she got in touch with them, or who paid them. They piped up and said they are working Pro Bono. I have to ask why they are even involved in this. Why does she need an attorney at all actually. Her attorney is on retainer for George Soros, and works also for The Democrat party. They are getting paid to do these kinds of things....they just aren't getting paid by her.

Claims she wasn't politically motivated, but yet posted on Social Media that someone should accuse Gorsich of Sexual Harassment to stop him from taking the bench. She deleted a ton of Anti Trump Social Media Posts prior to 'coming forward'

She claims she wanted to remain anonymous when she wrote her letter. Yet weeks before she was "revealed" to The Public, she already had a DNC Attorney Katz assigned to her, had a lie detector expert meet with her to coach her, and had media according to her at her home, contacting her at work and trying to pressure her to come forward before anyone knew her name. She also claims that someone hacked in to her email account and sent out emails about this weeks prior to anyone knowing who the Hell she was.

How did "The Media" get a copy of this letter, if Feinstein's office was the only one who had it? It was an intentional leak.

So I have to ask people with a brain. Do you have a brain? This was never intended to be anonymous. Feinstein and The Dems held on to this, prepared since July to unleash this mentally disturbed pawn on Kavenaugh to stop the Confirmation process from going forward.

She has Phd yet does not know what the word "exculpatory" means?

She claims that the event left an indelible memory upon her, yet cannot remember anything about it except that Kavenaugh and Judge jumped on her on the bed rolled off and started wrestling with each other, completely ignoring her. That's how interested they were in assaulting her?

She claims they turned up the music really loud in the bedroom so no one could hear her. Exactly why do you need to cover up someone's mouth then if the music was so loud no one could hear what was going on?

The other so called accusers also all have very vague stories, all are involved in Liberal Women's Organizations, and all have refused to give sworn testimony to their flimsy allegations.

Kavenaugh claims he was a virgin until he met his wife and got married. Why hasn't one woman came forward and claimed he is not a virgin? Because Kavenaugh is telling the truth, and like with his calendar that proves his whereabouts on the summer in question, he'd be able to out any potential liars and easily refute their claims.

If this wasn't a DNC funded political smear job, then why is Joe Biden's attorney involved? Why is Michael Avenatti involved? Why is Andrew McCabe's Attorney involved? And why is Katz representing her when she is on retainer with both Soros and The DNC? And why would Katz have to meet with Hillary Clinton to discuss any of this?

If I have missed anything, please feel free to chime in.

You keep throwing the word 'coup' around. And you've yet to use it correctly.

Ford's account precedes the hearings by about half a decade. Her account precedes Trump even announcing his presidency. Eliminating politics as a likely motive.....as why would she make politically motivated accusations against Kavanaugh in 2012? And then only tell her therapist, her husband and her friends?

Your narrative simply makes no sense.

Ford also passed a polygraph test that put the odds of her being deceptive at 0.05%. False rape accustions are also exceedingly rare......generally found to be less than 1 in 20. With most sexual assaults going unreported.

And Ford's testimony was very compelling and credible. And I'm not the only one who thinks so:

"This was extremely emotional, extremely raw, and extremely credible,” Wallace said during an appearance on Fox News during a brief Senate Judiciary Committee recess.

“Nobody could listen to her deliver those words and talk about the assault and the impact it had had on her life and not have your heart go out to her,” the "Fox News Sunday" host continued. “She obviously was traumatized by an event.”

“This is a disaster for the Republicans,” Wallace added.

Chris Wallace: Ford's testimony is 'a disaster for the Republicans'

And Chris Wallace was hardly alone:

Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano said on the same panel with Wallace that Ford came across as an "exceptionally credible" witness.

Chris Wallace: Ford's testimony is 'a disaster for the Republicans'

In your conspiractorial fantaticism, you can't see what the rest of us could: Ford was a credible, sympathetic witness relaying something that was deeply painful for her.

Trust me, the “rest of us” isn’t as big of a group as you think.

 

[bripat9643]

Here is the run down on Ford and why this whole thing was a charade that not even The FBI will look at. Bet if Comey was running the show, they would though.

Let's just start with some inconsistencies in her statements vs. her life.

Claims she is so fearful of other people that she rarely goes out in Public:
Attends Leftist Anti Trump Marches. Wears Pussy Hats, marches, carries signs and is frequently in large crowds at these gatherings.

She claims for some weird reason that she has a second door installed at her home for security reasons because she was so afraid of others.

The second door is actually a separate entrance in to her home so she can host "Google Interns" and they can ingress and egress the space. So afraid of strangers yet has them in her home every day.

So afraid of her attacker that she repeatedly would say hi to Judge whenever she saw him. She stated she saw him out a few times, the exchanges were friendly and she initiated each one. Only the last time she saw him, she claimed his face turned white. If that were true, then it's because he recognized her as a nut case.

Claims she has a phobia of flying, yet files all over the world, and flew to this hearing. She doesn't know who paid for her ticket, but she flew to this hearing, and had no issues with her alleged phobia.

She claims she was completely unaware that The Committee offered to fly out to California and interview her privately to protect her from Public Scrutiny. I don't believe this at all. The Democrats wanted a "Public Hearing" so they could grandstand and publicly tear Kavenaugh apart and humiliate him. Grassely and the American Public was conned in to having to endure a public hearing. It was common knowledge that The Committee offered to fly out to her.

Claims that she does not know who paid for her lie detector test which incidentally consisted of just two questions, despite the Lie Detector Expert spending over 4 hours with her. The test was conducted in a Hotel Room too, which is odd, since there was no reason for this to not be done in her home. And the so called test was conducted weeks in advance of anyone knowing anything about this except Feinstein. She doesn't know who paid for the Hotel Room. The Lie Detector Expert wasn't interviewing her, he was coaching her on how to beat a lie detector test. The test was conducted at a Hotel, because they did not want anyone seeing such a person come to her home. Her and Feinstein refuse to show the results of the lie detector test or even reveal what 2 questions were asked.

She claims that Kavenaugh was pinned her down and was trying to remove her clothes on a bed. She stated however that she was wearing her bathing suit from diving practice all day that day. Since when does any woman refer to a full piece bathing suit as 'clothes'? And what woman, conscience of hygiene and her appearance, would wear a bathing suit all day and show up at a party in a bathing suit which she called "clothes"? People who participate in such sports always shower after practice, and change in to street clothes, and place their suit in a bag.

She doesn't know who invited her to this party or who gave her a ride to the party or exactly where it was, or whose home it was in. Neither does she know the actual month, the year or the day of the week the party occurred. Contrast this with Kavenaugh and his activity calendar where he can account for his whereabouts ever day for that entire summer. She lives 10 miles from the general area that she said this occured in, and said she left the party and went home. Yet, she can't recall how she got home. Did she walk 10 miles in a bathing suit? And nobody saw her? Again, she is being intentionally vague.

She stated that after the alleged attack that her attacker was going to be a Supreme Court Justice some day. Anybody with a brain has to have a WTF moment. What 15 year old girl would ever say that after having a traumatic experience like she claims? And why cannot she remember any details except that she was sure 100% that Kavenaugh is who did it? She claims that the memory of that day was indeliable....but can't remember a damn thing about it.

She claims in one statement 2 people were there, and in another 4 people were there, and in a third statement 6 people were at the party. Yet no one she names has come forward to say such a party existed, or happened. She claims she told her therapist, and that what she said should be in the therapist notes. Yet, she and Feinstein refuse to produce, said notes.

Her own parents refused to attend the hearing to support her, and when interviewed stated that they do not believe she was ever a victim of sexual abuse. If your daughter or my daughter were going to be on National TV enduring a hearing regarding sexual assault, you bet damn well we'd be there to support her.

She has high priced attorneys directly connected to the Leftist Women's movement, yet doesn't know how she got in touch with them, or who paid them. They piped up and said they are working Pro Bono. I have to ask why they are even involved in this. Why does she need an attorney at all actually. Her attorney is on retainer for George Soros, and works also for The Democrat party. They are getting paid to do these kinds of things....they just aren't getting paid by her.

Claims she wasn't politically motivated, but yet posted on Social Media that someone should accuse Gorsich of Sexual Harassment to stop him from taking the bench. She deleted a ton of Anti Trump Social Media Posts prior to 'coming forward'

She claims she wanted to remain anonymous when she wrote her letter. Yet weeks before she was "revealed" to The Public, she already had a DNC Attorney Katz assigned to her, had a lie detector expert meet with her to coach her, and had media according to her at her home, contacting her at work and trying to pressure her to come forward before anyone knew her name. She also claims that someone hacked in to her email account and sent out emails about this weeks prior to anyone knowing who the Hell she was.

How did "The Media" get a copy of this letter, if Feinstein's office was the only one who had it? It was an intentional leak.

So I have to ask people with a brain. Do you have a brain? This was never intended to be anonymous. Feinstein and The Dems held on to this, prepared since July to unleash this mentally disturbed pawn on Kavenaugh to stop the Confirmation process from going forward.

She has Phd yet does not know what the word "exculpatory" means?

She claims that the event left an indelible memory upon her, yet cannot remember anything about it except that Kavenaugh and Judge jumped on her on the bed rolled off and started wrestling with each other, completely ignoring her. That's how interested they were in assaulting her?

She claims they turned up the music really loud in the bedroom so no one could hear her. Exactly why do you need to cover up someone's mouth then if the music was so loud no one could hear what was going on?

The other so called accusers also all have very vague stories, all are involved in Liberal Women's Organizations, and all have refused to give sworn testimony to their flimsy allegations.

Kavenaugh claims he was a virgin until he met his wife and got married. Why hasn't one woman came forward and claimed he is not a virgin? Because Kavenaugh is telling the truth, and like with his calendar that proves his whereabouts on the summer in question, he'd be able to out any potential liars and easily refute their claims.

If this wasn't a DNC funded political smear job, then why is Joe Biden's attorney involved? Why is Michael Avenatti involved? Why is Andrew McCabe's Attorney involved? And why is Katz representing her when she is on retainer with both Soros and The DNC? And why would Katz have to meet with Hillary Clinton to discuss any of this?

If I have missed anything, please feel free to chime in.

It doesn't surprise me that Katz is pals with Hillary. I knew that bitch was behind this.

 

[Skylar]

Here is the run down on Ford and why this whole thing was a charade that not even The FBI will look at. Bet if Comey was running the show, they would though.

Let's just start with some inconsistencies in her statements vs. her life.

Claims she is so fearful of other people that she rarely goes out in Public:
Attends Leftist Anti Trump Marches. Wears Pussy Hats, marches, carries signs and is frequently in large crowds at these gatherings.

She claims for some weird reason that she has a second door installed at her home for security reasons because she was so afraid of others.

The second door is actually a separate entrance in to her home so she can host "Google Interns" and they can ingress and egress the space. So afraid of strangers yet has them in her home every day.

So afraid of her attacker that she repeatedly would say hi to Judge whenever she saw him. She stated she saw him out a few times, the exchanges were friendly and she initiated each one. Only the last time she saw him, she claimed his face turned white. If that were true, then it's because he recognized her as a nut case.

Claims she has a phobia of flying, yet files all over the world, and flew to this hearing. She doesn't know who paid for her ticket, but she flew to this hearing, and had no issues with her alleged phobia.

She claims she was completely unaware that The Committee offered to fly out to California and interview her privately to protect her from Public Scrutiny. I don't believe this at all. The Democrats wanted a "Public Hearing" so they could grandstand and publicly tear Kavenaugh apart and humiliate him. Grassely and the American Public was conned in to having to endure a public hearing. It was common knowledge that The Committee offered to fly out to her.

Claims that she does not know who paid for her lie detector test which incidentally consisted of just two questions, despite the Lie Detector Expert spending over 4 hours with her. The test was conducted in a Hotel Room too, which is odd, since there was no reason for this to not be done in her home. And the so called test was conducted weeks in advance of anyone knowing anything about this except Feinstein. She doesn't know who paid for the Hotel Room. The Lie Detector Expert wasn't interviewing her, he was coaching her on how to beat a lie detector test. The test was conducted at a Hotel, because they did not want anyone seeing such a person come to her home. Her and Feinstein refuse to show the results of the lie detector test or even reveal what 2 questions were asked.

She claims that Kavenaugh was pinned her down and was trying to remove her clothes on a bed. She stated however that she was wearing her bathing suit from diving practice all day that day. Since when does any woman refer to a full piece bathing suit as 'clothes'? And what woman, conscience of hygiene and her appearance, would wear a bathing suit all day and show up at a party in a bathing suit which she called "clothes"? People who participate in such sports always shower after practice, and change in to street clothes, and place their suit in a bag.

She doesn't know who invited her to this party or who gave her a ride to the party or exactly where it was, or whose home it was in. Neither does she know the actual month, the year or the day of the week the party occurred. Contrast this with Kavenaugh and his activity calendar where he can account for his whereabouts ever day for that entire summer. She lives 10 miles from the general area that she said this occured in, and said she left the party and went home. Yet, she can't recall how she got home. Did she walk 10 miles in a bathing suit? And nobody saw her? Again, she is being intentionally vague.

She stated that after the alleged attack that her attacker was going to be a Supreme Court Justice some day. Anybody with a brain has to have a WTF moment. What 15 year old girl would ever say that after having a traumatic experience like she claims? And why cannot she remember any details except that she was sure 100% that Kavenaugh is who did it? She claims that the memory of that day was indeliable....but can't remember a damn thing about it.

She claims in one statement 2 people were there, and in another 4 people were there, and in a third statement 6 people were at the party. Yet no one she names has come forward to say such a party existed, or happened. She claims she told her therapist, and that what she said should be in the therapist notes. Yet, she and Feinstein refuse to produce, said notes.

Her own parents refused to attend the hearing to support her, and when interviewed stated that they do not believe she was ever a victim of sexual abuse. If your daughter or my daughter were going to be on National TV enduring a hearing regarding sexual assault, you bet damn well we'd be there to support her.

She has high priced attorneys directly connected to the Leftist Women's movement, yet doesn't know how she got in touch with them, or who paid them. They piped up and said they are working Pro Bono. I have to ask why they are even involved in this. Why does she need an attorney at all actually. Her attorney is on retainer for George Soros, and works also for The Democrat party. They are getting paid to do these kinds of things....they just aren't getting paid by her.

Claims she wasn't politically motivated, but yet posted on Social Media that someone should accuse Gorsich of Sexual Harassment to stop him from taking the bench. She deleted a ton of Anti Trump Social Media Posts prior to 'coming forward'

She claims she wanted to remain anonymous when she wrote her letter. Yet weeks before she was "revealed" to The Public, she already had a DNC Attorney Katz assigned to her, had a lie detector expert meet with her to coach her, and had media according to her at her home, contacting her at work and trying to pressure her to come forward before anyone knew her name. She also claims that someone hacked in to her email account and sent out emails about this weeks prior to anyone knowing who the Hell she was.

How did "The Media" get a copy of this letter, if Feinstein's office was the only one who had it? It was an intentional leak.

So I have to ask people with a brain. Do you have a brain? This was never intended to be anonymous. Feinstein and The Dems held on to this, prepared since July to unleash this mentally disturbed pawn on Kavenaugh to stop the Confirmation process from going forward.

She has Phd yet does not know what the word "exculpatory" means?

She claims that the event left an indelible memory upon her, yet cannot remember anything about it except that Kavenaugh and Judge jumped on her on the bed rolled off and started wrestling with each other, completely ignoring her. That's how interested they were in assaulting her?

She claims they turned up the music really loud in the bedroom so no one could hear her. Exactly why do you need to cover up someone's mouth then if the music was so loud no one could hear what was going on?

The other so called accusers also all have very vague stories, all are involved in Liberal Women's Organizations, and all have refused to give sworn testimony to their flimsy allegations.

Kavenaugh claims he was a virgin until he met his wife and got married. Why hasn't one woman came forward and claimed he is not a virgin? Because Kavenaugh is telling the truth, and like with his calendar that proves his whereabouts on the summer in question, he'd be able to out any potential liars and easily refute their claims.

If this wasn't a DNC funded political smear job, then why is Joe Biden's attorney involved? Why is Michael Avenatti involved? Why is Andrew McCabe's Attorney involved? And why is Katz representing her when she is on retainer with both Soros and The DNC? And why would Katz have to meet with Hillary Clinton to discuss any of this?

If I have missed anything, please feel free to chime in.

You keep throwing the word 'coup' around. And you've yet to use it correctly.

Ford's account precedes the hearings by about half a decade. Her account precedes Trump even announcing his presidency. Eliminating politics as a likely motive.....as why would she make politically motivated accusations against Kavanaugh in 2012? And then only tell her therapist, her husband and her friends?

Your narrative simply makes no sense.

Ford also passed a polygraph test that put the odds of her being deceptive at 0.05%. False rape accustions are also exceedingly rare......generally found to be less than 1 in 20. With most sexual assaults going unreported.

And Ford's testimony was very compelling and credible. And I'm not the only one who thinks so:

"This was extremely emotional, extremely raw, and extremely credible,” Wallace said during an appearance on Fox News during a brief Senate Judiciary Committee recess.

“Nobody could listen to her deliver those words and talk about the assault and the impact it had had on her life and not have your heart go out to her,” the "Fox News Sunday" host continued. “She obviously was traumatized by an event.”

“This is a disaster for the Republicans,” Wallace added.

Chris Wallace: Ford's testimony is 'a disaster for the Republicans'

And Chris Wallace was hardly alone:

Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano said on the same panel with Wallace that Ford came across as an "exceptionally credible" witness.

Chris Wallace: Ford's testimony is 'a disaster for the Republicans'

In your conspiractorial fantaticism, you can't see what the rest of us could: Ford was a credible, sympathetic witness relaying something that was deeply painful for her.

Trust me, the “rest of us” isn’t as big of a group as you think.

Laughing.....'us' is a much larger group that you and your ilk want to admit. You just spit in the eye of women across the country that have been victims of sexual violence, demonstrating that they won't be believed, that they'll be called sluts, liars, whores or be blamed for what happened to them.

Weeks before the midterms. You've just supercharged the most crucial voting block of this election cycle against you.

The bill comes due, Book.

 

[bripat9643]

Of course it was and if the Rs fall for this and fail to confirm, they ALL need to be thrown out.

Anyone with a brain could see this was a SHAM, so why did THE GOP even allow this lying nut job one second of air time?

It happened because of Flake. They needed his vote, and he's a spineless Trump hating moron, of course. That's what happens when you vote for so-called "moderates," of course.

 

[Coyote]

There are already a multitude of Ford and Kavanaugh threads. We don’t need more. An official thread for this has been pinned to the top of this forum.