LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 50,938
- 18,231
- 2,250
ha,as I knew it,the OCTA'S could only fling shit in defeat like the monkeys they are and cover their ears ans close their eyes to the facts.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What, these loons still don't have any facts?
Yeah, that's what I thought.
Oh well, i'll check back again in a couple o' weeks. You know, just to see if they come back with any facts, or some shit like that.
ha,as I knew it,the OCTA'S could only fling shit in defeat like the monkeys they are and cover their ears ans close their eyes to the facts.![]()
shit is all you fling, moronha,as I knew it,the OCTA'S could only fling shit in defeat like the monkeys they are and cover their ears ans close their eyes to the facts.![]()
What, these loons still don't have any facts?
Yeah, that's what I thought.
Oh well, i'll check back again in a couple o' weeks. You know, just to see if they come back with any facts, or some shit like that.
Yeah the truthers know you OCTA's dont have any facts,thats old news,no need to brag about it.Just because the truth scares you and you cover your ears and close your eyes when facts are presented that you dont like,that doesnt mean facts that prove explosives were used werent used.![]()
Common Ground - February 2011Dr. Harrit is the lead scientist of a European, nine-author, peer-reviewed study*, which found millions of microscopic red-gray chips in the World Trade Center dust. These chips, at first thought to be paint, were ignited and determined to be unburned nanothermite
Common Ground - February 2011Dr. Harrit is the lead scientist of a European, nine-author, peer-reviewed study*, which found millions of microscopic red-gray chips in the World Trade Center dust. These chips, at first thought to be paint, were ignited and determined to be unburned nanothermite
Common Ground - February 2011Dr. Harrit is the lead scientist of a European, nine-author, peer-reviewed study*, which found millions of microscopic red-gray chips in the World Trade Center dust. These chips, at first thought to be paint, were ignited and determined to be unburned nanothermite
These samples did they appear 6 years after 911 and were preserved under conditions that aught to make anyone skeptical ?
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
There was no explosion. There isn't an explosive expert in the world who could have pulled it off.
no, it isnt, moronFor every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
There was no explosion. There isn't an explosive expert in the world who could have pulled it off.
Exactly. So how do 30 stories crush 70 stories? Physically impossible.
no, it isnt, moronFor every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
There was no explosion. There isn't an explosive expert in the world who could have pulled it off.
Exactly. So how do 30 stories crush 70 stories? Physically impossible.
you are an idiotno, it isnt, moronExactly. So how do 30 stories crush 70 stories? Physically impossible.
Newton's 3rd Law: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
30 stories cannot crush 70 stories.
you are an idiotno, it isnt, moron
Newton's 3rd Law: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
30 stories cannot crush 70 stories.
that post doesnt even make a lick of sense
PhysicsExist?.......Yeah, no shit.......Take a physics course and you might actually learn, that yes, PHYSICS EXIST!you are an idiotNewton's 3rd Law: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
30 stories cannot crush 70 stories.
that post doesnt even make a lick of sense
Understandable, this is too high of caliber stuff for you to grasp.
Isaac Newton says 9/11 was a controlled demolition.
you clearly dont understand mass and inertiayou are an idiotNewton's 3rd Law: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
30 stories cannot crush 70 stories.
that post doesnt even make a lick of sense
Understandable, this is too high of caliber stuff for you to grasp.
Isaac Newton says 9/11 was a controlled demolition.
you clearly dont understand mass and inertiayou are an idiot
that post doesnt even make a lick of sense
Understandable, this is too high of caliber stuff for you to grasp.
Isaac Newton says 9/11 was a controlled demolition.
L M A O!you clearly dont understand mass and inertiaUnderstandable, this is too high of caliber stuff for you to grasp.
Isaac Newton says 9/11 was a controlled demolition.
LOL...
Dwain Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng – Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Before this appointment, he served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden. Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award and the Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988). Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics, a distinguished speaking engagement sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) (1986). Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000. Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology. 37 year NASA career.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:
"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Center]."
AE911Truth.org
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report