as usual you lie agent.we answer questions about them all the time,maybe physics doesn't,but I have never Eots for one,dodge a question asked of him ,same with many other truthers.
you agents though just post crap thats been disproven when the answers are given to you like you did with your pathetic fairy tale NIST report in response to J Beaukema's opening post.Im proud of J,unlike other Bush dupes like Toto for instance,he isnt arrogant and can admit it when he is proven wrong and not afraid of the truth.
NIST kept changing their story when their official story was shreaded to pieces by independent investigaters..
When the answers are given to you in those videos,like the cowards you are,you wont even address ONE of them.yeah i have ALSO noticed how its been over 24 hours and YOU did not take me up on my challenge and explain why whats wrong with even ONE of these videos hypocrite.
as i have said thousands of times over the years,thats a very reasonable request.YOUR just as funny as he is in the fact like all OCTA'S,you wont even address ONE of these videos and explain whats wrong with it.you are easily the biggest hypocrite here i know of other than your fellow agent candytroll.
oh by the way,you also prove you are a major hypocrite moron in the hat because you fail to mention that candycorn does the EXACT same thing that Physics does,everytime he is confronted with evidence and facts that he cant counter,he changes the subject and evades it, and worse,trys to derail the topic, yet you never mention that little tidbit.
why would you,you will protect your fellow agent at all costs.
i could go back and find many posts of people here that have said the exact same thing about him,how they have said he is the only one they have ever put on their ignore list cause of the troll that he is because of that and how they have told people that side with him,they have no credibility since they side with him.matter of fact,there was this one site that he used to post at that so many people put HIM on thier ignore list for that very reason.they made a thread there called IS CANDYCORN ON YOUR IGNORE LIST. Anybody that knows this troll,knows he is the biggest troll alive,that his life is so pathetic,he quotes someone like me who has them on their ignore list.how pitiful.what an attention seeker.the trolls life is so patheitc he quotes me and talks to himself.cant get more pathetic than that.
same with divecunt.
I know when someone has ME on thier ignore list,i dont keep talking to them seeking attention.
I will address their posts to others like i did with gomer who has me on ignore just to show how stupid their posts is.big different there,im talking to EVERYBODY in that case,im not talking to myself addressing that person like those two trolls with no life do.
First off, let's get this out of the way. The Geraldo interview with Bob McIlvaine was the first post that Prince Evado of Newtonia made on this board. I questioned him about it within hours of his posting it, and to this day he hasn't answered my question. I will repeat it, yet another time, to give him a chance to educate me and sway me to his point of view.
Hey PhysicsExists, why is it in the video you posted of the Geraldo Rivera interview, does Bob McIlvaine dodge and evade when Geraldo asks him if the architects and engineers agree with his theory.
Now, to your challenge. I went to Canada Truth 9/11 - Video Library and chose a video at random. Please answer my questions about the video, "Flight 77 The White Plane".
The first witness claims the plane passed at treetop level over his house, over the Army-Navy Country Club, north of the Citgo station, and onward into the Pentagon. This would be ground effect flight, and experienced pilots could not manage this with any accuracy for the amount of time this would take, so how did this plane manage it?
Witness number 2 says the plane passed at treetop level over his golf course, (well south of the Citgo station) and onward into the Pentagon. Again, how could a pilot manage to fly in ground effect for this distance? Also, the witness claims twice that it was an American Airlines jet. Why does the interviewer browbeat him until he claims it was white?
Witness #3 says the plane was way south of the Citgo station. How does this square up with witness #1? Also this witness never said the plane was white, only that they saw numbers on the plane. Why does the narrator claim that she said it was white?
Witness #4 claims the plane had propellers. Why does the interviewer push her until she says it was a jet?
Witness #5 can't decide what color the plane was. Do you see him as credible?
Witnesses #6 through #9 are quoted, instead of interviewed. Why?
Witness #10 describes Air Force 2 as being the plane that hit the Pentagon. Why would the govt. use such a valuable asset for the attack?
Witness #11 says it flew over the Citgo station, contradicting the last 10 witnesses. Why should we believe him?
Witness #12 claims the plane was trying to pull up and avoid the Pentagon. Why do the other 11 witnesses not make this claim? Mr Turcios also says the plane was silver. Again, he makes a claim the other 11 do not. Who do we believe?
The Truth Movement wishes to be seen as teachers, and a good teacher would answer questions from their students. If you answer these questions to my satisfaction, I will watch another of your videos (I have bookmarked the site), and will ask any questions I have of that one. Together, we shall research this event, and you may win a convert.
I await your answers to my questions. And in time, Prince Evado may answer my simple question about his first video, and I may look at another one of his, and explore the events of 9/11 with him also.
cool
