Explain how this is an exoneration

[bripat9643]

No collusion, no obstruction, no evidence.

Here MiddleFingerMoron....tell us WHERE you got that info. to come to that "brilliant" conclusion???

Certainly NOT from the Mueller report......LMAO

I got it from the Mueller report, retard. However, it was widely available prior to that.

 

[boedicca]

Mueller didn't make a recommendation to indict Trump. Nuff said.

"Nuff said" by a moron.....and THAT is GOOD......go back to bed

Here. for smarter republicans......

The only thing standing between Trump & indictment is his presidential status......Nothing more

If it weren't so tragic, your cover up of a coup attempt would be hilarious.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Mueller's report explains his prosecutorial decisions in four points.

1. The DOJ's OLC has issued the opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and the SC accepted that opinion for the purposes of his investigation, further recognizing that a DOJ indictment might preempt the constitutional mechanism of impeachment.
2. The investigation was nevertheless warranted because an criminal investigation is permitted under the OLC's standard, even when an indictment is not. Other individuals engaging in obstruction could be prosecuted immediately. And the President is not immune from prosecution after leaving office, regardless of whether impeachment proceedings are brought or are successful. So the investigation served the purpose of preserving evidence while witness memories were fresh.
3. The normal public mechanism for an individual accused of a crime to clear themselves is a speedy public criminal trial. If the sitting President cannot be brought to a criminal trial while in office, then it would be unfair for the SC to affirmatively accuse him of a crime that cannot be prosecuted in a criminal court of law at this time. Even a sealed indictment's secrecy could not be guaranteed to be preserved. Accordingly, a criminal accusation against a sitting President could be harmful to the country, because the accusation cannot be resolved in the normal adversarial manner of a criminal trial.
   
4. The results of the investigation do not allow the SC to conclude that the President did not commit obstruction.

So please explain how this exonerates Donald?

It doesn’t.

But Trump sycophants will never admit that fact.

 

[boedicca]

Mueller didn't make a recommendation to indict Trump. Nuff said.

"Nuff said" by a moron.....and THAT is GOOD......go back to bed

Here. for smarter republicans......

The only thing standing between Trump & indictment is his presidential status......Nothing more

Wrong. There's also the utter lack of evidence, and the lack of any crime to justify starting the investigation.

If there is not crime, there is no obstruction.

The Mueller investigation was unethical from the beginning; Beria would applaud.

 

[Meathead]

Mueller's report explains his prosecutorial decisions in four points.

1. The DOJ's OLC has issued the opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and the SC accepted that opinion for the purposes of his investigation, further recognizing that a DOJ indictment might preempt the constitutional mechanism of impeachment.
2. The investigation was nevertheless warranted because an criminal investigation is permitted under the OLC's standard, even when an indictment is not. Other individuals engaging in obstruction could be prosecuted immediately. And the President is not immune from prosecution after leaving office, regardless of whether impeachment proceedings are brought or are successful. So the investigation served the purpose of preserving evidence while witness memories were fresh.
3. The normal public mechanism for an individual accused of a crime to clear themselves is a speedy public criminal trial. If the sitting President cannot be brought to a criminal trial while in office, then it would be unfair for the SC to affirmatively accuse him of a crime that cannot be prosecuted in a criminal court of law at this time. Even a sealed indictment's secrecy could not be guaranteed to be preserved. Accordingly, a criminal accusation against a sitting President could be harmful to the country, because the accusation cannot be resolved in the normal adversarial manner of a criminal trial.
   
4. The results of the investigation do not allow the SC to conclude that the President did not commit obstruction.

So please explain how this exonerates Donald?

Prove a negative and you are God.

 

[nat4900]

I got it from the Mueller report, retard.

OK, DiaperBaby....cite EXACTLY where the Mueller report states, "NO OBSTRUCTION"...and "NO EVIDENCE."

(what a bunch of easily kicked in the ass Trump cultists......LMAO)

 

[bripat9643]

I got it from the Mueller report, retard.

OK, DiaperBaby....cite EXACTLY where the Mueller report states, "NO OBSTRUCTION"...and "NO EVIDENCE."

(what a bunch of easily kicked in the ass Trump cultists......LMAO)

Where did it cite evidence of collusion? Where did it site evidence of obstruction?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You're projecting bub. And your powers of logic are as poor as your powers of perception. I'm a gal.

Everyone looks the same on the internet babe, don't take it personally.

Trump is a flawed human being as we all knew prior to the election. No credible person ever called him a "sort of God'. He never claimed to have power over NATURE by halting the rise of the oceans. What he has done is FIGHT BACK. Normal people are sick and tired of being attacked and demonized by the Prog-Left while their supposed leaders remained idle or made excuses.

There are all sorts of people that are worshiped, there are a large number of Trump worshipers that cannot say a single thing about him.

This thread is the perfect example...Donald Says 138 Million People dead

Trump fucked up and it was funny...but not a single Trump worshiper can say 'yeah, he fucked up"....they all jump to his defense like he was their mother. One of the worshipers even went so far as to suggest his account had been hacked!

That's what has you loons TERRIFIED...along with with the spotlight on the Prog-Dem corruption the Barr investigation into Obamagate will place. There isn't enough popcorn to do justice to your Epic Meltdown when you finally understand that Obama oversaw the surveillance operation on a political candidate and used the powers of the executive branch to punish political enemies. Worse Than Watergate.

You are either really naive or really stupid if you think anything is going to happen to Obama or anyone else. Ironically Watergate was the last time we held the politically elite accountable for anything.

 

[boedicca]

You're projecting bub. And your powers of logic are as poor as your powers of perception. I'm a gal.

Everyone looks the same on the internet babe, don't take it personally.

Trump is a flawed human being as we all knew prior to the election. No credible person ever called him a "sort of God'. He never claimed to have power over NATURE by halting the rise of the oceans. What he has done is FIGHT BACK. Normal people are sick and tired of being attacked and demonized by the Prog-Left while their supposed leaders remained idle or made excuses.

There are all sorts of people that are worshiped, there are a large number of Trump worshipers that cannot say a single thing about him.

This thread is the perfect example...Donald Says 138 Million People dead

Trump fucked up and it was funny...but not a single Trump worshiper can say 'yeah, he fucked up"....they all jump to his defense like he was their mother. One of the worshipers even went so far as to suggest his account had been hacked!

That's what has you loons TERRIFIED...along with with the spotlight on the Prog-Dem corruption the Barr investigation into Obamagate will place. There isn't enough popcorn to do justice to your Epic Meltdown when you finally understand that Obama oversaw the surveillance operation on a political candidate and used the powers of the executive branch to punish political enemies. Worse Than Watergate.

You are either really naive or really stupid if you think anything is going to happen to Obama or anyone else. Ironically Watergate was the last time we held the politically elite accountable for anything.

Blah blah blah so sleepy....zzzzz

Trump is President. hiLIARy is not. And Obamagate is Worse Than Watergate.

You loons are going to have the most Epic Meltdown EVAH once the Barr reports on his investigation into Obama's illegal surveillance operation.

 

[SmokeALib]

Mueller's report explains his prosecutorial decisions in four points.

1. The DOJ's OLC has issued the opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and the SC accepted that opinion for the purposes of his investigation, further recognizing that a DOJ indictment might preempt the constitutional mechanism of impeachment.
2. The investigation was nevertheless warranted because an criminal investigation is permitted under the OLC's standard, even when an indictment is not. Other individuals engaging in obstruction could be prosecuted immediately. And the President is not immune from prosecution after leaving office, regardless of whether impeachment proceedings are brought or are successful. So the investigation served the purpose of preserving evidence while witness memories were fresh.
3. The normal public mechanism for an individual accused of a crime to clear themselves is a speedy public criminal trial. If the sitting President cannot be brought to a criminal trial while in office, then it would be unfair for the SC to affirmatively accuse him of a crime that cannot be prosecuted in a criminal court of law at this time. Even a sealed indictment's secrecy could not be guaranteed to be preserved. Accordingly, a criminal accusation against a sitting President could be harmful to the country, because the accusation cannot be resolved in the normal adversarial manner of a criminal trial.
   
4. The results of the investigation do not allow the SC to conclude that the President did not commit obstruction.

So please explain how this exonerates Donald?

It's called innocent until proven guilty. Dumass.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Blah blah blah so sleepy....zzzzz

Trump is President. hiLIARy is not.

That's ok, I did not vote for either one of them and do not really see much difference between them

And Obamagate is Worse Than Watergate.

a lot of things have been worse than Watergate, hell if Watergate happened today it would not even make the headlines.

You loons are going to have the most Epic Meltdown EVAH once the Barr reports on his investigation into Obama's illegal surveillance operation.

you are just as deluded as those that thought Mueller was going to bring Trump down, but as I always say, there is little difference between the right wing and the left wing.

 

[bripat9643]

You're projecting bub. And your powers of logic are as poor as your powers of perception. I'm a gal.

Everyone looks the same on the internet babe, don't take it personally.

Trump is a flawed human being as we all knew prior to the election. No credible person ever called him a "sort of God'. He never claimed to have power over NATURE by halting the rise of the oceans. What he has done is FIGHT BACK. Normal people are sick and tired of being attacked and demonized by the Prog-Left while their supposed leaders remained idle or made excuses.

There are all sorts of people that are worshiped, there are a large number of Trump worshipers that cannot say a single thing about him.

This thread is the perfect example...Donald Says 138 Million People dead

Trump fucked up and it was funny...but not a single Trump worshiper can say 'yeah, he fucked up"....they all jump to his defense like he was their mother. One of the worshipers even went so far as to suggest his account had been hacked!

That's what has you loons TERRIFIED...along with with the spotlight on the Prog-Dem corruption the Barr investigation into Obamagate will place. There isn't enough popcorn to do justice to your Epic Meltdown when you finally understand that Obama oversaw the surveillance operation on a political candidate and used the powers of the executive branch to punish political enemies. Worse Than Watergate.

You are either really naive or really stupid if you think anything is going to happen to Obama or anyone else. Ironically Watergate was the last time we held the politically elite accountable for anything.

Why would any Trump worshiper feel the need to attack him over a trival technical gaff? There is no shortage of Trump hating morons like you on this forum who attack every time he belches, so why should I do it?

When you start attacking Hillary, perhaps I'll start worrying about Trump. Until then, quit your whining.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You're projecting bub. And your powers of logic are as poor as your powers of perception. I'm a gal.

Everyone looks the same on the internet babe, don't take it personally.

Trump is a flawed human being as we all knew prior to the election. No credible person ever called him a "sort of God'. He never claimed to have power over NATURE by halting the rise of the oceans. What he has done is FIGHT BACK. Normal people are sick and tired of being attacked and demonized by the Prog-Left while their supposed leaders remained idle or made excuses.

There are all sorts of people that are worshiped, there are a large number of Trump worshipers that cannot say a single thing about him.

This thread is the perfect example...Donald Says 138 Million People dead

Trump fucked up and it was funny...but not a single Trump worshiper can say 'yeah, he fucked up"....they all jump to his defense like he was their mother. One of the worshipers even went so far as to suggest his account had been hacked!

That's what has you loons TERRIFIED...along with with the spotlight on the Prog-Dem corruption the Barr investigation into Obamagate will place. There isn't enough popcorn to do justice to your Epic Meltdown when you finally understand that Obama oversaw the surveillance operation on a political candidate and used the powers of the executive branch to punish political enemies. Worse Than Watergate.

You are either really naive or really stupid if you think anything is going to happen to Obama or anyone else. Ironically Watergate was the last time we held the politically elite accountable for anything.

Why would any Trump worshiper feel the need to attack him over a trival technical gaff? There is no shortage of Trump hating morons like you on this forum who attack every time he belches, so why should I do it?

When you start attacking Hillary, perhaps I'll start worrying about Trump. Until then, quit your whining.

Then you go and prove my point...laughing at something dumb someone did or said is not attacking someone. But your Trump Defense Syndrome will not allow you to admit that he is even capable of making a mistake.

Start some Hillary threads and I will laugh at her also.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[S.J.]

Mueller's report explains his prosecutorial decisions in four points.

1. The DOJ's OLC has issued the opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and the SC accepted that opinion for the purposes of his investigation, further recognizing that a DOJ indictment might preempt the constitutional mechanism of impeachment.
2. The investigation was nevertheless warranted because an criminal investigation is permitted under the OLC's standard, even when an indictment is not. Other individuals engaging in obstruction could be prosecuted immediately. And the President is not immune from prosecution after leaving office, regardless of whether impeachment proceedings are brought or are successful. So the investigation served the purpose of preserving evidence while witness memories were fresh.
3. The normal public mechanism for an individual accused of a crime to clear themselves is a speedy public criminal trial. If the sitting President cannot be brought to a criminal trial while in office, then it would be unfair for the SC to affirmatively accuse him of a crime that cannot be prosecuted in a criminal court of law at this time. Even a sealed indictment's secrecy could not be guaranteed to be preserved. Accordingly, a criminal accusation against a sitting President could be harmful to the country, because the accusation cannot be resolved in the normal adversarial manner of a criminal trial.
   
4. The results of the investigation do not allow the SC to conclude that the President did not commit obstruction.

So please explain how this exonerates Donald?

It's called innocent until proven guilty. Dumass.

Exactly. If the prosecutor does not find enough evidence to prosecute, the target of the investigation, by default, is exonerated (automatically). And the burden of proof does not even come close to being met. You must be found guilty IN A COURT OF LAW. If there's not enough evidence to bring charges, there sure as shit isn't enough evidence to convict. The Mueller report DOES exonerate the President, even if Mueller can't bring himself to say it.

 

[boedicca]

Blah blah blah so sleepy....zzzzz

Trump is President. hiLIARy is not.

That's ok, I did not vote for either one of them and do not really see much difference between them

And Obamagate is Worse Than Watergate.

a lot of things have been worse than Watergate, hell if Watergate happened today it would not even make the headlines.

You loons are going to have the most Epic Meltdown EVAH once the Barr reports on his investigation into Obama's illegal surveillance operation.

you are just as deluded as those that thought Mueller was going to bring Trump down, but as I always say, there is little difference between the right wing and the left wing.

Keep telling that to yourself if it gives you comfort. In RealityLand, Obamagate is the worse scandal ever in a Presidential Administration. Obama spied on a political opponent and then orchestrated a coup attempt. That is why the Dems are in a tizzy to destroy Trump...so that this crime will stay covered. But guess what? It's too late for that. The Barr report is going to cause your head to explode.

 

[Papageorgio]

Mueller's report explains his prosecutorial decisions in four points.

1. The DOJ's OLC has issued the opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and the SC accepted that opinion for the purposes of his investigation, further recognizing that a DOJ indictment might preempt the constitutional mechanism of impeachment.
2. The investigation was nevertheless warranted because an criminal investigation is permitted under the OLC's standard, even when an indictment is not. Other individuals engaging in obstruction could be prosecuted immediately. And the President is not immune from prosecution after leaving office, regardless of whether impeachment proceedings are brought or are successful. So the investigation served the purpose of preserving evidence while witness memories were fresh.
3. The normal public mechanism for an individual accused of a crime to clear themselves is a speedy public criminal trial. If the sitting President cannot be brought to a criminal trial while in office, then it would be unfair for the SC to affirmatively accuse him of a crime that cannot be prosecuted in a criminal court of law at this time. Even a sealed indictment's secrecy could not be guaranteed to be preserved. Accordingly, a criminal accusation against a sitting President could be harmful to the country, because the accusation cannot be resolved in the normal adversarial manner of a criminal trial.
   
4. The results of the investigation do not allow the SC to conclude that the President did not commit obstruction.

So please explain how this exonerates Donald?

Let the Impeachment begin. For all the crying and butthurt over the report, then ***** to the Democrats to impeach Trump.

All the BS directed at Trump supporters is comical.

Until The House Democrats go for impeachment, like they said during the 2018 elections, this is all up in the air. Blame Democrats for not doing their job.

 

[Olde Europe]

Mueller Report, Vol II, p2:

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment.​

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Keep telling that to yourself if it gives you comfort.

I do not really give a shit either way, as long as it does not **** up the markets.

In RealityLand, Obamagate is the worse scandal ever in a Presidential Administration. Obama spied on a political opponent and then orchestrated a coup attempt. That is why the Dems are in a tizzy to destroy Trump...so that this crime will stay covered. But guess what? It's too late for that. The Barr report is going to cause your head to explode.

Babe, you and reality have no connection at all. You are exactly like all the "Trump is done" morons out there. I have been paying attention to US politics since the early 80s and I can tell you that nothing is going to happen, it never does.

But, I am willing to put my views on the line, are you?

How about this...if by Jan 1 2020 Barr has not indicted Obama or Hillary or Comey or anyone of that level, you leave this forum forever, if Barr has done that I will leave the forum forever. you got the guts to back up your fantasy?

 

[Meister]

Keep telling that to yourself if it gives you comfort.

I do not really give a shit either way, as long as it does not **** up the markets.

In RealityLand, Obamagate is the worse scandal ever in a Presidential Administration. Obama spied on a political opponent and then orchestrated a coup attempt. That is why the Dems are in a tizzy to destroy Trump...so that this crime will stay covered. But guess what? It's too late for that. The Barr report is going to cause your head to explode.

Babe, you and reality have no connection at all. You are exactly like all the "Trump is done" morons out there. I have been paying attention to US politics since the early 80s and I can tell you that nothing is going to happen, it never does.

But, I am willing to put my views on the line, are you?

How about this...if by Jan 1 2020 Barr has not indicted Obama or Hillary or Comey or anyone of that level, you leave this forum forever, if Barr has done that I will leave the forum forever. you got the guts to back up your fantasy?

It took 2+ years for Mueller to not bring an indictment to the table, and you want to make a bet on something to happen, or not happen in just 8 months?
Wow you stacked that deck.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Keep telling that to yourself if it gives you comfort.

I do not really give a shit either way, as long as it does not **** up the markets.

In RealityLand, Obamagate is the worse scandal ever in a Presidential Administration. Obama spied on a political opponent and then orchestrated a coup attempt. That is why the Dems are in a tizzy to destroy Trump...so that this crime will stay covered. But guess what? It's too late for that. The Barr report is going to cause your head to explode.

Babe, you and reality have no connection at all. You are exactly like all the "Trump is done" morons out there. I have been paying attention to US politics since the early 80s and I can tell you that nothing is going to happen, it never does.

But, I am willing to put my views on the line, are you?

How about this...if by Jan 1 2020 Barr has not indicted Obama or Hillary or Comey or anyone of that level, you leave this forum forever, if Barr has done that I will leave the forum forever. you got the guts to back up your fantasy?

It took 2+ years for Mueller to not bring an indictment to the table, and you want to make a bet on something to happen, or not happen in just 8 months?
Wow you stacked that deck.

On a site like this it is sort of dumb to go any longer than that, nobody will remember the bet was even made.

Besides, we were all told that Mueller was nothing but a witch hunt and that this is an open and closed case.