LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 50,938
- 18,230
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #1,701
I would also like to add that is now July 11, and carson was announced in Feb. and to date i have not heard one lick about the purchasing or purchase price for the 257 acres of contaminated carson land of this supposed stadium. Every account of carsonfrom the Natl media (like clayton) mentions the charaiders purchasing that land, but what they are being told is that is the 11 acres of non contaminated land they bought for 25 mil (which they plan to re sale)....if the natl media would just do some investigative journalism they would see this and not report carson as viable
They already went down that road years ago, and it was an absolute loser. Not only would the NFL risk having to pay triple damages to Stan, they would also lose out on the relocation $$$ that might be owed with a move. I say "might," because Al Davisavoided paying relocation fees when moving back to Oakland after 12 years in LA. Why should Stan pay a dime when he is simply moving the team back to its former city, just like Al did? The precedent has been set there, as well. Now this is being said as if the NFL still has a decision to make. I, for one, believe they've already made that decision, and Stan has played "nice" by giving up the 2015 season in LA, in order to give SD and Oak one more year to fool-around in their home markets. The writing is on the wall, and Jerry Jones' words from months ago are more than prophetic: The NFL cannot stop Stan from relocating the Rams. (It's also interesting to note that Jones has his own specific merchandising and TV splits, independent of the rest of the league.)
The NFL is putting pressure on SD politicos by making it seem Chargers to LA is not a pipe dream. This is nothing more than posturing; the real money is in Stan's plan.
And that's why Stan remains quiet he's done all he needs is the vote The RAMS in L.A is huge !!! more TV money in the pockets of these owners , I agree 100% this is posturing and it will continue through till August The Rose Bowl said no probably b/c they want the Chargers to be permanent Pasadena officials know that Carson is not happening stay tuned.

They already went down that road years ago, and it was an absolute loser. Not only would the NFL risk having to pay triple damages to Stan, they would also lose out on the relocation $$$ that might be owed with a move. I say "might," because Al Davisavoided paying relocation fees when moving back to Oakland after 12 years in LA. Why should Stan pay a dime when he is simply moving the team back to its former city, just like Al did? The precedent has been set there, as well. Now this is being said as if the NFL still has a decision to make. I, for one, believe they've already made that decision, and Stan has played "nice" by giving up the 2015 season in LA, in order to give SD and Oak one more year to fool-around in their home markets. The writing is on the wall, and Jerry Jones' words from months ago are more than prophetic: The NFL cannot stop Stan from relocating the Rams. (It's also interesting to note that Jones has his own specific merchandising and TV splits, independent of the rest of the league.)

The NFL is putting pressure on SD politicos by making it seem Chargers to LA is not a pipe dream. This is nothing more than posturing; the real money is in Stan's plan.
And that's why Stan remains quiet he's done all he needs is the vote The RAMS in L.A is huge !!! more TV money in the pockets of these owners , I agree 100% this is posturing and it will continue through till August The Rose Bowl said no probably b/c they want the Chargers to be permanent Pasadena officials know that Carson is not happening stay tuned.
Last edited: