“The truth is, if people could overcome the fear of the “worst” candidate and voted for what they believed in, the façade would begin to crumble. If the media and others covered third parties more, unaligned voters—for example, people who believe in peace and freedom—would have a new incentive to participate and give a positive vote.”
This isn’t ‘the truth.’
Citizens have legitimate, warranted, justified, and documented concerns with regard to their rights and protected liberties. .
It is not a ‘façade’ that republicans and conservatives, for the most part, are hostile to the privacy rights of women, the equal protection rights of gay Americans, the due process rights of immigrants, the First Amendment rights of Muslims, and the voting rights of African-Americans.
Republican candidates for president have consistently made clear their intent to appoint justices to the Supreme Court who would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade, Plyler v. Doe, and Obergefell v. Hodges, to note but a few examples, allowing the states to compel women to give birth against their will and to deny same-sex couples their right to marry.
So yes, there is indeed a worst candidate, having nothing do with ‘fear,’ and everything to do with citizens seeking to defend their fundamental civil rights from reactionary conservative politicians who have contempt for those rights.