Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I can't see EV's being very popular in the northern states of the country.
Because in the winter time when temperatures get into 30 degrees and below. Battery efficiency and driving range falls by about 50% and is even worse if you use the car's heater to keep warm. Plus, if there is a power grid outage, you just have an expensive lump of metal on four wheels setting on the driveway.
Whereas, an ICE car has self contained stored energy in the form of gasoline or diesel, that is ready to start and drive regardless of the ambient temperature. ...
Ten areas where EVs will be a long time in coming, if ever. The poor consumer is the guinea pig yet again under the thumb of big government.
- Local power outage.
- Extreme cold and long winters.
- Heavy towing.
- Long distance traveling.
- Dump trucks.
- Construction vehicles.
- Semi trucking.
- Jet/airline transportation.
- Shipping.
- Trains.
Trains can actually be powered by electricity without too much problem. That is one area where I think you are wrong.
Dipstick #80: We have been doing EV research. Haven’t you understood previous posts that are in your mother tongue?
Area #51: The fatal mistake of sucking on the Petroleum Pimp is that the fossil fuel is not renewable, it is a finite resource. Sooner or later, the party’s over. At least it is possible to recycle 100% of lithium.
LOL Old man, you are still completely full of shit. 30% than we presently produce would do the trick;No, we will not. We will have to increase electrical supply, and that can be done easily and relatively cheaply. VPP's for urban areas and agrisolar for rural areas.We'd have to double electrical generation and distribution system to fully replace gasoline.As the batteries get better and cheaper, by 2025, the EV's will achieve price parity with ICE's, and from then on, it will be all downhill for the ICE's. Because the EV's require far less maintenance, cost far less per mile to run, and you can even make you own fuel for them with some solar panels. Plus they out perform ICE's in acceleration. Proof of that is that Ford is now building E-mustangs and E-150's. And virtually every other manufacture is adding EV''s to their product line. With more utilities encouraging VPP's, that will be even more incentive for owning an EV.
's,
No, it can't. To power the fleets of EV's you claim are going to take over the world, you would need to build over 50 fossil fuel power plants, next year. And the same number the year after that, and the year after that, and the year after that.
Solar and wind can't do the job no matter how much propaganda you believe.
And you pretend to be a Phd Geologist? LOL We have a huge reserve right on the Oregon-Nevada border in the McDermitt Caldera. In fact, given the geology of Oregon, Nevada, Idaho, and Utah, I suspect that there are like deposits in those states.Area #51: The fatal mistake of sucking on the Petroleum Pimp is that the fossil fuel is not renewable, it is a finite resource. Sooner or later, the party’s over. At least it is possible to recycle 100% of lithium.
Lithium is a FAR MORE limited resource than oil, moron.
I'm still waiting..........................
Do you realize how easy it is to include battery replacement warranty? If your scenario is what is dooming the sale of future EV's, it can be be solved with one stroke of a pen.
What bullshit. While it's abundance is #25 element, it can be reused again and again. Not only that, there are battery technologies coming online that use more common elements, like aluminum.Area #51: The fatal mistake of sucking on the Petroleum Pimp is that the fossil fuel is not renewable, it is a finite resource. Sooner or later, the party’s over. At least it is possible to recycle 100% of lithium.
Lithium is a FAR MORE limited resource than oil, moron.
And you pretend to be a Phd Geologist? LOL We have a huge reserve right on the Oregon-Nevada border in the McDermitt Caldera. In fact, given the geology of Oregon, Nevada, Idaho, and Utah, I suspect that there are like deposits in those states.Area #51: The fatal mistake of sucking on the Petroleum Pimp is that the fossil fuel is not renewable, it is a finite resource. Sooner or later, the party’s over. At least it is possible to recycle 100% of lithium.
Lithium is a FAR MORE limited resource than oil, moron.
"Lithium Nevada says it will start mining at Thacker Pass in 2022, initially producing about 30,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate. It will begin production on its second phase in 2025, doubling that number. Officials say it will provide 25% of the world's lithium and will have a mine life of at least 46 years."Lithium-Rich Claystone in the McDermitt Caldera, Nevada, USA: Geologic, Mineralogical, and Geochemical Characteristics and Possible Origin
Lithium deposits in tuffaceous sediments of the McDermitt caldera constitute possibly the world’s largest Li clay resource, yet their characteristics and origin are not established. The 40 × 25 km McDermitt caldera collapsed during the eruption of ~1000 km3 of a 16.4 Ma, zoned peralkaline to...www.mdpi.com
https://www.essoar.org/doi/pdf/10.1002/essoar.10500817.1#:~:text=The deposit is the southernmost,, with some >8800%20ppm.Nevada Mine Could Produce 25% of World's Lithium
The largest known lithium deposit in the United States is in northern Nevada, and a mining company says it has big plans for the property.www.ktvn.com
LOL Old man, you are still completely full of shit. 30% than we presently produce would do the trick;No, we will not. We will have to increase electrical supply, and that can be done easily and relatively cheaply. VPP's for urban areas and agrisolar for rural areas.We'd have to double electrical generation and distribution system to fully replace gasoline.As the batteries get better and cheaper, by 2025, the EV's will achieve price parity with ICE's, and from then on, it will be all downhill for the ICE's. Because the EV's require far less maintenance, cost far less per mile to run, and you can even make you own fuel for them with some solar panels. Plus they out perform ICE's in acceleration. Proof of that is that Ford is now building E-mustangs and E-150's. And virtually every other manufacture is adding EV''s to their product line. With more utilities encouraging VPP's, that will be even more incentive for owning an EV.
's,
No, it can't. To power the fleets of EV's you claim are going to take over the world, you would need to build over 50 fossil fuel power plants, next year. And the same number the year after that, and the year after that, and the year after that.
Solar and wind can't do the job no matter how much propaganda you believe.
LOL Old man, you are still completely full of shit. 30% than we presently produce would do the trick;No, we will not. We will have to increase electrical supply, and that can be done easily and relatively cheaply. VPP's for urban areas and agrisolar for rural areas.We'd have to double electrical generation and distribution system to fully replace gasoline.As the batteries get better and cheaper, by 2025, the EV's will achieve price parity with ICE's, and from then on, it will be all downhill for the ICE's. Because the EV's require far less maintenance, cost far less per mile to run, and you can even make you own fuel for them with some solar panels. Plus they out perform ICE's in acceleration. Proof of that is that Ford is now building E-mustangs and E-150's. And virtually every other manufacture is adding EV''s to their product line. With more utilities encouraging VPP's, that will be even more incentive for owning an EV.
's,
No, it can't. To power the fleets of EV's you claim are going to take over the world, you would need to build over 50 fossil fuel power plants, next year. And the same number the year after that, and the year after that, and the year after that.
Solar and wind can't do the job no matter how much propaganda you believe.
Can you show me that math?
LOL Old man, you are still completely full of shit. 30% than we presently produce would do the trick;No, we will not. We will have to increase electrical supply, and that can be done easily and relatively cheaply. VPP's for urban areas and agrisolar for rural areas.We'd have to double electrical generation and distribution system to fully replace gasoline.As the batteries get better and cheaper, by 2025, the EV's will achieve price parity with ICE's, and from then on, it will be all downhill for the ICE's. Because the EV's require far less maintenance, cost far less per mile to run, and you can even make you own fuel for them with some solar panels. Plus they out perform ICE's in acceleration. Proof of that is that Ford is now building E-mustangs and E-150's. And virtually every other manufacture is adding EV''s to their product line. With more utilities encouraging VPP's, that will be even more incentive for owning an EV.
's,
No, it can't. To power the fleets of EV's you claim are going to take over the world, you would need to build over 50 fossil fuel power plants, next year. And the same number the year after that, and the year after that, and the year after that.
Solar and wind can't do the job no matter how much propaganda you believe.
Can you show me that math?
It was in the video. So maybe take the time to understand what you are replying to. Or just be considered truly stupid.
When modular batteries (each module is connected to another to make an entire battery) become automated via vending, the woman won’t have to do anything except a voyeur imitation. Not only batteries should be standardized, the method of installing them and taking them out should be standardized and automated. duh
LOL Old man, you are still completely full of shit. 30% than we presently produce would do the trick;No, we will not. We will have to increase electrical supply, and that can be done easily and relatively cheaply. VPP's for urban areas and agrisolar for rural areas.We'd have to double electrical generation and distribution system to fully replace gasoline.As the batteries get better and cheaper, by 2025, the EV's will achieve price parity with ICE's, and from then on, it will be all downhill for the ICE's. Because the EV's require far less maintenance, cost far less per mile to run, and you can even make you own fuel for them with some solar panels. Plus they out perform ICE's in acceleration. Proof of that is that Ford is now building E-mustangs and E-150's. And virtually every other manufacture is adding EV''s to their product line. With more utilities encouraging VPP's, that will be even more incentive for owning an EV.
's,
No, it can't. To power the fleets of EV's you claim are going to take over the world, you would need to build over 50 fossil fuel power plants, next year. And the same number the year after that, and the year after that, and the year after that.
Solar and wind can't do the job no matter how much propaganda you believe.
And you pretend to be a Phd Geologist? LOL We have a huge reserve right on the Oregon-Nevada border in the McDermitt Caldera. In fact, given the geology of Oregon, Nevada, Idaho, and Utah, I suspect that there are like deposits in those states.Area #51: The fatal mistake of sucking on the Petroleum Pimp is that the fossil fuel is not renewable, it is a finite resource. Sooner or later, the party’s over. At least it is possible to recycle 100% of lithium.
Lithium is a FAR MORE limited resource than oil, moron.
"Lithium Nevada says it will start mining at Thacker Pass in 2022, initially producing about 30,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate. It will begin production on its second phase in 2025, doubling that number. Officials say it will provide 25% of the world's lithium and will have a mine life of at least 46 years."Lithium-Rich Claystone in the McDermitt Caldera, Nevada, USA: Geologic, Mineralogical, and Geochemical Characteristics and Possible Origin
Lithium deposits in tuffaceous sediments of the McDermitt caldera constitute possibly the world’s largest Li clay resource, yet their characteristics and origin are not established. The 40 × 25 km McDermitt caldera collapsed during the eruption of ~1000 km3 of a 16.4 Ma, zoned peralkaline to...www.mdpi.com
https://www.essoar.org/doi/pdf/10.1002/essoar.10500817.1#:~:text=The deposit is the southernmost,, with some >8800%20ppm.Nevada Mine Could Produce 25% of World's Lithium
The largest known lithium deposit in the United States is in northern Nevada, and a mining company says it has big plans for the property.www.ktvn.com
What bullshit. While it's abundance is #25 element, it can be reused again and again. Not only that, there are battery technologies coming online that use more common elements, like aluminum.Area #51: The fatal mistake of sucking on the Petroleum Pimp is that the fossil fuel is not renewable, it is a finite resource. Sooner or later, the party’s over. At least it is possible to recycle 100% of lithium.
Lithium is a FAR MORE limited resource than oil, moron.
Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles - Nature
Processes for dismantling and recycling lithium-ion battery packs from scrap electric vehicles are outlined.www.nature.com
And you have never seen anyone run their car out of gas? Even with some of the new EV's getting 500 to 600 miles per charge, some people will still run them until they have no charge left.