Evolution is a False Religion not Proven Science.

[MaryL]

Science isn't a belief system based on faith, it is based on interactions with the natural world. It isn't imposed on the outside world, it is observation and reasonable deductions based on how the physical world works. Not metaphysical guesses on how the world ought to be out of prejudices or guesswork. Evolution is NOT a religion, false or real or otherwise. They say, religion is the opiate of the masses.

 

[PostmodernProph]

Science isn't a belief system based on faith, it is based on interactions with the natural world. It isn't imposed on the outside world, it is observation and reasonable deductions based on how the physical world works. Not metaphysical guesses on how the world ought to be out of prejudices or guesswork. Evolution is NOT a religion, false or real or otherwise. They say, religion is the opiate of the masses.

macro evolution is crack......

 

[THE LIGHT]

I used to eat meat but my thinking evolved over time and now I'm a vegetarian. Then we had 2 children who are both vegetarians. That's an evolution towards a healthier lifestyle, and now our branch of our family trees has changed/mutated/evolved into vegetarians. Pretty simple to understand really.

But you are still human beings.

I hope.

It's still evolution.

micro-evolution.

 

[BillyP]

But you are still human beings.

I hope.

It's still evolution.

micro-evolution.

Add up lots of small changes and you have change over a long period of time. What's not to understand?

 

[PostmodernProph]

It's still evolution.

micro-evolution.

Add up lots of small changes and you have change over a long period of time. What's not to understand?

the part where you pretend its been proven by science to have resulted in single celled organisms turning into humans......or even into multicelled organisms......

 

[Gadawg73]

So of the thousands of accepted theories out there in the world scientists PICKED ONE, JUST ONE, to put out there that they KNOW is false yet they offer it as fact anyway.
That is what the religious right claims.
Anyone that claims that is true is a damn fool.
Evolution is considered as fact because it has stood up to FAR MORE rigor than any other scientific theory in the history of man.

thousands of accepted theories

So tell us Old Buddy - what are a few of these "thousands of accepted theories" regarding how life on Earth came to be what it is. I can only think of two Creationism and Evolution

Please start with showing where creationism is an accepted scientific theory.
Where did I claim that evolution was the ONLY accepted scientific theory?

 

[alang1216]

micro-evolution.

Add up lots of small changes and you have change over a long period of time. What's not to understand?

the part where you pretend its been proven by science to have resulted in single celled organisms turning into humans......or even into multicelled organisms......

Proven to the satisfaction of the vast majority of those scientists that have studied it.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The exact reason why you are trying to disprove creation and put it out of your conscience. After all the word conscience comes from the prefix "con" which means with and the root word "science". Put together they mean with science. You are given a conscience by the creator that convicts you of the existence of a Creator. Evolution is just a means of finding something that can block common sense.
(Romans 1:22)

You have it backwards. I'm not trying to disprove Creation or the existence of any God(s). I'm trying to understand how the natural world functions. The problem comes when there's a scientific finding that doesn't mesh with someone's holy book. Of course, the holy book can't possibly be wrong or not holy or not literal, so we end up with all the mental gymnastics from your crowd about how the science is wrong, or the passage isn't to be taken literally this time, or how if you squint your eyes and turn your heard just right the vague meaning of a passage written for Bronze Age goat herders is exactly what the findings of particle astrophysicists are finding.

I don't think science is wrong. I LOVE science. It is your superstitious belief in the unproven and unobservable pseudo science of macro-evolution that I have a problem with.

What's your scientifically plausible alternative to what you call the pseudo-science of macro-evolution?

We are here, afterall. We know the earth has a multi-billion year history, afterall. We know the earth has been populated with thousands, maybe millions of different sorts - species if you will - of living creatures past and present.

Once you've rejected macro evolution, what are you left with as the better theory?

 

[BillyP]

micro-evolution.

Add up lots of small changes and you have change over a long period of time. What's not to understand?

the part where you pretend its been proven by science to have resulted in single celled organisms turning into humans......or even into multicelled organisms......

So how did humans come about? God made them whole, no evolution required?

 

[Gadawg73]

Add up lots of small changes and you have change over a long period of time. What's not to understand?

the part where you pretend its been proven by science to have resulted in single celled organisms turning into humans......or even into multicelled organisms......

Proven to the satisfaction of the vast majority of those scientists that have studied it.

99% of all scientists.

 

[GISMYS]

YES!!! YOU CAN BREED DOGS for size color and such(micro evolution) but you can never breed a dog into a cow(macro evolution) so how foolish to think pond scum evolved into humans??????????

 

[PostmodernProph]

So of the thousands of accepted theories out there in the world scientists PICKED ONE, JUST ONE, to put out there that they KNOW is false yet they offer it as fact anyway.
That is what the religious right claims.
Anyone that claims that is true is a damn fool.
Evolution is considered as fact because it has stood up to FAR MORE rigor than any other scientific theory in the history of man.

thousands of accepted theories

So tell us Old Buddy - what are a few of these "thousands of accepted theories" regarding how life on Earth came to be what it is. I can only think of two Creationism and Evolution

Please start with showing where creationism is an accepted scientific theory.
Where did I claim that evolution was the ONLY accepted scientific theory?

isn't it funny that even though we keep pointing out that no one is claiming creationism is science instead of faith, every time we get close to convincing someone that abiogenesis and macro-evolution are not science they always fall back to "yeah, but creationism isn't science"....

we know that, dude!......

 

[PostmodernProph]

the part where you pretend its been proven by science to have resulted in single celled organisms turning into humans......or even into multicelled organisms......

Proven to the satisfaction of the vast majority of those scientists that have studied it.

99% of all scientists.

well, if we are measuring truth by the number who believe, 3 billion Christians still trump you......

the simple fact of the matter is, regardless of how many scientists you quote, it has NOT been proven by science.....

 

[Vandalshandle]

Santa Clause does not make all the toys that he delivers on Christmas Eve. He has a whole bunch of elves that work for him in his shop all year. Any fool knows that. This is a scientific fact.

 

[alang1216]

YES!!! YOU CAN BREED DOGS for size color and such(micro evolution) but you can never breed a dog into a cow(macro evolution) so how foolish to think pond scum evolved into humans??????????

How arrogant to tell God what he can and can't do.

You don't know the mechanism God used to create man, who's to say he didn't utilize evolution?

 

[GISMYS]

YES!!! YOU CAN BREED DOGS for size color and such(micro evolution) but you can never breed a dog into a cow(macro evolution) so how foolish to think pond scum evolved into humans??????????

How arrogant to tell God what he can and can't do.

You don't know the mechanism God used to create man, who's to say he didn't utilize evolution?

LOL!!! READ GENESIS AND LEARN HOW GOD CREATED the universe and little man!!!

 

[alang1216]

Proven to the satisfaction of the vast majority of those scientists that have studied it.

99% of all scientists.

well, if we are measuring truth by the number who believe, 3 billion Christians still trump you......

the simple fact of the matter is, regardless of how many scientists you quote, it has NOT been proven by science.....

If I was looking for information about Christianity I'd ask a Christian, if I wanted information on science, I'd ask a scientist.

 

[GISMYS]

99% of all scientists.

well, if we are measuring truth by the number who believe, 3 billion Christians still trump you......

the simple fact of the matter is, regardless of how many scientists you quote, it has NOT been proven by science.....

If I was looking for information about Christianity I'd ask a Christian, if I wanted information on science, I'd ask a scientist.

lol!!! all true science is GOD'S creation,not little man!!!

 

[alang1216]

YES!!! YOU CAN BREED DOGS for size color and such(micro evolution) but you can never breed a dog into a cow(macro evolution) so how foolish to think pond scum evolved into humans??????????

How arrogant to tell God what he can and can't do.

You don't know the mechanism God used to create man, who's to say he didn't utilize evolution?

LOL!!! READ GENESIS AND LEARN HOW GOD CREATED the universe and little man!!!

Actually, Genesis only says he did, it doesn't tell us HOW he did it.

 

[PratchettFan]

How arrogant to tell God what he can and can't do.

You don't know the mechanism God used to create man, who's to say he didn't utilize evolution?

LOL!!! READ GENESIS AND LEARN HOW GOD CREATED the universe and little man!!!

Actually, Genesis only says he did, it doesn't tell us HOW he did it.

Actually, it does. I believe it says we came out of a mud puddle.