Evidence of Common Descent (LOTS, across the sciences)

[Fort Fun Indiana]

2022 Noble Prize in Physics awarded for proving we live in a simulation….but “Evolution” is for real

LOL

Frank, could you please translate this into coherent english?

Are you saying nothing can be real, because everything is a simulation?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You mean you can trace our evolutionary history back millions of years, but you don't know how the cell works?

What about that is hard for you to understand? There are limits to our observational powers. If all we had to do to understand the full workings of a cell was measure some fossils we dug up, then we WOULD know everything about how cells work.

 

[Woodznutz]

What about that is hard for you to understand? There are limits to our observational powers. If all we had to do to understand the full workings of a cell was measure some fossils we dug up, then we WOULD know everything about how cells work.

I understand fully.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I understand fully.

Oh, you learned.something since you last posted? Because your question shows very clearly you do not understand.

 

[luiza]

LOL Bimbo
This has nothing to do with your MAGAt Conspiracism. (Fake news, Deep state)
Post Scientific Refutation or leave.
`

Idiot .
Wiki is Deep State controlled .
Did Mummy not tell you

 

[abu afak]

Idiot .
Wiki is Deep State controlled .
Did Mummy not tell you

And you are a brainwashed MAGAt Monkey with no proof of '"deep state."
and they certainly don't and have never controlled the Evolution vs Kweationist Klown issue.
(except in the Bible Belt states like Kansas where they are forcing the Bible down Stupid young throats like yours that would otherwise have a reverends tool in it.)
`

 

[abu afak]

2022 Noble Prize in Physics awarded for proving we live in a simulation….but “Evolution” is for real

LOL

You missed the OP/Extensive Evidence of Evo with infinitely More information than the -0- you've posted in 7 years.

`

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

And now we await Evidence for Creationism, ID, the designER/god. Any evidence at all.​

​

Evidence of common descent - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Contents​

• 1 Evidence from comparative physiology and biochemistry
  • 1.1 Genetics
  • 1.2 Specific examples from comparative physiology and biochemistry
• 2 Evidence from comparative anatomy
  • 2.1 Atavisms
  • 2.2 Evolutionary developmental biology and embryonic development
  • 2.3 Homologous structures and divergent (adaptive) evolution
  • 2.4 Nested hierarchies and classification
  • 2.5 Vestigial structures
  • 2.6 Specific examples from comparative anatomy
• 3 Evidence from paleontology
  • 3.1 Fossil record
  • 3.2 Limitations
  • 3.3 Specific examples from paleontology
• 4 Evidence from biogeography
  • 4.1 Continental distribution
  • 4.2 Island biogeography
  • 4.3 Ring species
  • 4.4 Specific examples from biogeography
• 5 Evidence from selection
  • 5.1 Artificial selection and experimental evolution
  • 5.2 Invertebrates
  • 5.3 Microbes
  • 5.4 Plants and fungi
  • 5.5 Vertebrates
• 6 Evidence from speciation
  • 6.1 Fossils
  • 6.2 Invertebrates
  • 6.3 Plants
  • 6.4 Vertebrates
• 7 Evidence from coloration
  • 7.1 Mimicry and aposematism
  • 7.2 Camouflage
• 8 Evidence from behavior
• 9 Evidence from mathematical modeling and simulation
• 10 See also
• 11 References
• 12 Sources
• 13 External links

And now we await Evidence for Creationism, ID, the designER/god .. any evidence at all.
`

What would evidence of creationism look like to you? If I were to show it to you, what would you do with it to decide if it was or was not evidence of creation? What characteristics must it have to be convincing to you?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Idiot .
Wiki is Deep State controlled .
Did Mummy not tell you

Please just **** off with your magat conspiracy bullshit, this is a science thread.

I came here to get away from those uneducated, anti-intellectual, religious fundamentalist Neanderthals that are crawling all over the place these days, ******* pests.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What would evidence of creationism look like to you?

That's the problem. There cannot be evidence of supernatural nonsense, axiomatically. There also cannot be evidence against supernatural nonsense.

 

[abu afak]

What would evidence of creationism look like to you? If I were to show it to you, what would you do with it to decide if it was or was not evidence of creation? What characteristics must it have to be convincing to you?

Anything at all that would show there is some Supernatural force at work/in control.
You know, like the legendary 'Miracles.'

But What I would prefer is something more definitive.
Like the stars all line up one night and spell VISHNU in Hindi.
I would be thrilled to finally have some answers instead of my Honest position of saying "God of the Gaps"/"we don't know/know yet."

Of course, others/Religionists would Not be thrilled. Tens/Hundreds of Millions of Christians and Muslims would be devastated and many commit suicide. Their lives/belief systems destroyed.
But no matter who shows up at least 75% of the population will be wrong... so chances are your creation myth is wrong. (as we know Genesis is)
`

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Anything at all that would show there is some Supernatural force at work/in control.
You know, like the legendary 'Miracles.'

I want to emphasize that my question is very serious, I'm not playing here, just in case that might cross some peoples' minds.

But What I would prefer is something more definitive.
Like the stars all line up one night and spell VISHNU in Hindi.
I would be thrilled to finally have some answers instead of my Honest position of saying "God of the Gaps"/"we don't know/know yet."

Well if the stars did line up (that is, they moved) then why would that serve as evidence for a creator rather than simply being something we've never seen before that we can't yet explain scientifically? how would you know that there wasn't a naturalistic explanation just waiting to be found?

Of course others/Religionists would not be thrilled. Tens of Millions of Christians and Muslims would be devastated and many commit suicide. Their lives/belief systems destroyed.

Possibly, but can we stick to the core issue of how we decide if some observation is evidence for a supernatural agency.

How do you distinguish between some truly supernatural observation and a natural one that's currently unknown to us?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I want to emphasize that my question is very serious,

And I gave you the one, correct answer.

Your question is nonsensical. It's like asking what is north of the north pole.

 

[abu afak]

"...Well if the stars did line up (that is, they moved) then why would that serve as evidence for a creator rather than simply being something we've never seen before that we can't yet explain scientifically? how would you know that there wasn't a naturalistic explanation just waiting to be found?

What an ldiot! That could not possibly be an accident but only an omnipotent being re-orging stars in the name of a hindu god enlightening us.

You're a F**** Moron.
`

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

What an ldiot! That could not possibly be an accident but an omnipotent being re-orging stars in the name of a hindu god.

You're a F**** Moron.
`

I thought you were serious when you asked the OP question, seems I was mistaken.

You're just as unpleasant and bigoted as magats, what has happened to people...

 

[alang1216]

What would evidence of creationism look like to you? If I were to show it to you, what would you do with it to decide if it was or was not evidence of creation? What characteristics must it have to be convincing to you?

How about a creature with wheels?

 

[Woodznutz]

Oh, you learned.something since you last posted? Because your question shows very clearly you do not understand.

I understand that no one really understands evolution or how the cell works.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I understand that no one really understands evolution or how the cell works.

Scientists understand very well how evolution works. They also understand very well how cells work. It's you who doesn't understand these things.

Will we ever understand every detail of any physical system? Not likely. Effective Theories are still very effective.

Like, the Theory of Gravity.

 

[Woodznutz]

Scientists understand very well how evolution works. They also understand very well how cells work. It's you who doesn't understand these things.

Will we ever understand every detail of any physical system? Not likely. Effective Theories are still very effective.

Like, the Theory of Gravity.

So why isn't everyone convinced?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So why isn't everyone convinced?

Because people are prone to believing total nonsense. Like magical mythology.