Evidence of Common Descent (LOTS, across the sciences)

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I don't need to, I'm an electronics engineer and a software engineer. How do you prove that there's no evidence for the supernatural?

You clearly do.

And you most are not a software engineer, unless you mean a game tester. Anyone who has ever written code in any language would not have asked the question you asked.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I don't need to, I'm an electronics engineer and a software engineer. How do you prove that there's no evidence for the supernatural?

I already did. I outlined the logical "proof" for you.

Already done. Evidence requires determinism and physical measurements.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

You clearly do.

And you most are not a software engineer, unless yo lean a game tester. Anyone who has ever written code in any language would not have asked the question you asked.

I'm a software engineer and have been working in that capacity professionally for forty five years. I've designed and built programming languages feel free to pick my brains if you want to prove I am "not a software engineer".

I'm waiting for the logic, the reasoned argument that ends with ...therefore there can be no evidence for the supernatural".

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

I already did. I outlined the logical "proof" for you.

Already done. Evidence requires determinism and physical measurements.

What about the evidence of non-determinism? why are you ignoring that reality?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I'm a software engineer and have been working in that capacity professionally for forty five years.

But apparently have not written any code, ever.

You asked a pretty basic question about logic.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What about the evidence of non-determinism?

Already covered. Easily deduced from my premises.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

But apparently have not written any code, ever.

As you wish, why not test me?

You asked a pretty basic question about logic.

I asked a basic question about a proposition you wrote that was incomplete, it yields an undefined consequences in the case that A is not true.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

As you wish.

I asked a basic question about a proposition you wrote that was incomplete, it yields an undefined consequence in the case that A is not true.

So? You haven't made any point. I understand basic logic.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

So? You haven't made any point. I understand basic logic.

The point has been made that the simplistic proposition you wrote is undefined when A is false. That means you do not know the result if A is false.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Fort Fun Indiana

Consider your proposition: "There can be no evidence for the supernatural"

Share with us the proof that the proposition is true, step by step, showing us any assumptions you need to make etc.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The point has been made that the simplistic proposition you wrote is undefined when A is false. That means you do not know the result if A is false.

Which is not relevant anyway, but thank you

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Consider your proposition: "There can be no evidence for the supernatural"

I already considered and argued this.

Now you take the opposite position and argue it.

Tell us how we find evidence for the supernatural.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Which is not relevant anyway, but thank you

You're welcome.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

I already considered and argued this.

Are you the only person who claims to have proven this? Can you find any published examples from others that claim the same thing?

Now you take the opposite position and argue it.

I can always prove what I claim, where did I make such a claim?

 

[JohnDB]

And now we await Evidence for Creationism, ID, the designER/god. Any evidence at all.​

​

Evidence of common descent - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Contents​

• 1 Evidence from comparative physiology and biochemistry
  • 1.1 Genetics
  • 1.2 Specific examples from comparative physiology and biochemistry
• 2 Evidence from comparative anatomy
  • 2.1 Atavisms
  • 2.2 Evolutionary developmental biology and embryonic development
  • 2.3 Homologous structures and divergent (adaptive) evolution
  • 2.4 Nested hierarchies and classification
  • 2.5 Vestigial structures
  • 2.6 Specific examples from comparative anatomy
• 3 Evidence from paleontology
  • 3.1 Fossil record
  • 3.2 Limitations
  • 3.3 Specific examples from paleontology
• 4 Evidence from biogeography
  • 4.1 Continental distribution
  • 4.2 Island biogeography
  • 4.3 Ring species
  • 4.4 Specific examples from biogeography
• 5 Evidence from selection
  • 5.1 Artificial selection and experimental evolution
  • 5.2 Invertebrates
  • 5.3 Microbes
  • 5.4 Plants and fungi
  • 5.5 Vertebrates
• 6 Evidence from speciation
  • 6.1 Fossils
  • 6.2 Invertebrates
  • 6.3 Plants
  • 6.4 Vertebrates
• 7 Evidence from coloration
  • 7.1 Mimicry and aposematism
  • 7.2 Camouflage
• 8 Evidence from behavior
• 9 Evidence from mathematical modeling and simulation
• 10 See also
• 11 References
• 12 Sources
• 13 External links

And now we await Evidence for Creationism, ID, the designER/god .. any evidence at all.
`

Ummmm
You do understand that the fossile record does demonstrate something completely opposite.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Fort Fun Indiana

This could have taken you thirty seconds, instead you labored here for days on end and still got it wrong.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Are you the only person who claims to have proven this? Can you find any published examples from others that claim the same thing?

I can always prove what I claim, where did I make such a claim?

When you're done tap dancing, state your position.

Do you agree with me or not?

I'm falling into a deep sleep.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Fort Fun Indiana

View attachment 1053852

Oh look, precisely what I said.

I'm starting to think that you're not really following.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Oh look, Precisely what I said.

You're no different to the trumpanzees on this site, you claim to be different but that's clearly a lie, you are just as inept as them, a denier that denies irrespective of truth.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You're no different to the trumpanzees on this site, you claim to be different but that's clearly a lie, you are just as inept as them, a denier that denies irrespective of truth.

View attachment 1053854

You always have to resort to these little tantrums.

And you never took any position.

You're an intellectual fraud and an intellectual coward. You have no good arguments for any of your positions.

I said there cannot be evidence for oragainst the supernatural.

And that set you off into some kind of weird donward spiral.

And then you accidentally agreed with me.

Very bizarre to watch.