Even After Latest Attack, Liberals Refuse to Support Vehicle Control

[P@triot]

WTF? There's a big difference between a vehicle and a gun. Vehicles transports our entire effin economy,,,while a goddamn gun only real focus is to KILL! Don't you understand?

Hey you ignorant little fuck - if (and I quote) "a goddamn gun only real focus is to KILL" why do law enforcement officers carry them?!? Are they paid assassins?!?

You literally get dumber with each post.

 

[Synthaholic]

The government can NOT regulate abortion, guns, bazookas, and/or vehicles.

Of course they can. Perfectly Constitutional.

 

[Synthaholic]

Hey you ignorant little fuck - if (and I quote) "a goddamn gun only real focus is to KILL" do law enforcement officers carry them?!? Are they paid assassins?!?

You literally get dumber with each post.

In case they have to kill. Duh!

You have no business calling anyone else dumb, retard.

 

[P@triot]

Tell that to SCOTUS, then.

Oh, they know that already.

But they are corrupt to the core.

Has their rulings affected "drug" consumption in these US of A?

Well , neither will their edict preventing us from bearing arms.

.

Congress absolutely has the right to regulate guns. That was decided in the 1930s, and confirmed with Heller.

And if you think the government cannot make you comply with whatever law they make, you're delusional.

They can stop Social Security payments for old farts like you, they can garnish wages for young studs like me, they can confiscate your property, pick you up on your way to buying your Viagra and put you in jail.

The possibilities are endless!

Only for people like you who are too illiterate to read the U.S. Constitution. For the rest of us, everything you just said is 100% false and the asinine ramblings of an idiot.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

WTF? There's a big difference between a vehicle and a gun. Vehicles transports our entire effin economy,,,while a goddamn gun only real focus is to KILL! Don't you understand?

No, a gun's purpose is self defense, that has always been its purpose. what you're talking about the intent of possible owners. A gun holds no blood lust of its own, and only serves as a tool. Besides, even if guns did hold a blood lust of their own, and had no use for self defense, then the government still couldn't get them out of the hands of criminals, even if the entire world banned them, because criminals don't follow the law. Even on the off chance that production was stopped entirely, determined enough criminals would build their own, then sell them on the Black Market or through the Deep Web.

Excellent reasons for regulation.

I mean, if you didn't read the post, one would come to that incorrect conclusion. I pointed out that regulations only effect those that follow the law, and actually help those that don't. The left ignore this fact because they don't want Americans legally armed.

My conclusion is correct, and yours is wrong. If we control vehicles, we can regulate guns. Nothing in the Constitution prohibits that.

I'm pointing out that regulating guns only stops law-abiding citizens. Criminals do not care. I see you're revealing yourself as another far-left drone. Vehicles are regulated because they aren't used to defend yourself, and because, let's face it, the government can make more money off of people by requiring a license.

 

[P@triot]

Hey you ignorant little fuck - if (and I quote) "a goddamn gun only real focus is to KILL" do law enforcement officers carry them?!? Are they paid assassins?!?

You literally get dumber with each post.

In case they have to kill. Duh!

You have no business calling anyone else dumb, retard.

Why would a police officer ever need to kill, you mental midget?!? They have a numbers advantage, they have handcuffs, mace, tactical batons, and even major non-lethal weapons like tasers which completely and totally incapacitate people.

Like the mooch Matthew, you also get dumber with every post

 

[Contumacious]

Tell that to SCOTUS, then.

Oh, they know that already.

But they are corrupt to the core.

Has their rulings affected "drug" consumption in these US of A?

Well , neither will their edict preventing us from bearing arms.

.

Congress absolutely has the right to regulate guns. That was decided in the 1930s, and confirmed with Heller.

And if you think the government cannot make you comply with whatever law they make, you're delusional.

They can stop Social Security payments for old farts like you, they can garnish wages for young studs like me, they can confiscate your property, pick you up on your way to buying your Viagra and put you in jail.

The possibilities are endless!

I understand the possibilities are endless.Reason Justice McReynolds stated in 1935 that "the Constitution is gone"

FREEMEN must be armed at all times and must NOT buy for a second the bullshit that they can regulate our right to defend our lives.


Drug users continue to use drugs today despite the huge police state stacked against them.

Gun Aficionados must do the same.


.

.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

No, a gun's purpose is self defense, that has always been its purpose. what you're talking about the intent of possible owners. A gun holds no blood lust of its own, and only serves as a tool. Besides, even if guns did hold a blood lust of their own, and had no use for self defense, then the government still couldn't get them out of the hands of criminals, even if the entire world banned them, because criminals don't follow the law. Even on the off chance that production was stopped entirely, determined enough criminals would build their own, then sell them on the Black Market or through the Deep Web.

Excellent reasons for regulation.

I mean, if you didn't read the post, one would come to that incorrect conclusion. I pointed out that regulations only effect those that follow the law, and actually help those that don't. The left ignore this fact because they don't want Americans legally armed.

My conclusion is correct, and yours is wrong. If we control vehicles, we can regulate guns. Nothing in the Constitution prohibits that.

Wow Jakey using himself as a source isn't that every post he does......try adding content to the discussion instead of zero.....Cars are not in the constitution, guns are, suck on it, love it......and go regulate your posts by adding something.....not just your bullshit opinion.

The sillies on the far right self cite themselves all the time, , so I am not too concerned with the criticism. The Constitution and SCOTUS certainly permits gun regulation.. It has happened in the past and will in the future. The number is a reasonable man standard supported by common knowledge.

Actually, I'm citing actual facts. You could attempt to assert that regulating guns will somehow effect criminals because they totally, TOTALLY, follow the law, but then you'd only be making yourself look even more clueless. Though, to be fair, you've done that with every post thus far, why stop now?

 

[bripat9643]

The government can NOT regulate abortion, guns, bazookas, and/or vehicles.

Of course they can. Perfectly Constitutional.

No it isn't, no matter what the Supreme Court says.

 

[Synthaholic]

Tell that to SCOTUS, then.

Oh, they know that already.

But they are corrupt to the core.

Has their rulings affected "drug" consumption in these US of A?

Well , neither will their edict preventing us from bearing arms.

.

Congress absolutely has the right to regulate guns. That was decided in the 1930s, and confirmed with Heller.

And if you think the government cannot make you comply with whatever law they make, you're delusional.

They can stop Social Security payments for old farts like you, they can garnish wages for young studs like me, they can confiscate your property, pick you up on your way to buying your Viagra and put you in jail.

The possibilities are endless!

Only for people like you who are too illiterate to read the U.S. Constitution. For the rest of us, everything you just said is 100% false and the asinine ramblings of an idiot.

You know that the 2nd is an 'amendment', don't you? Maybe you should look up that word, because you're babbling.

So if they could amend the Constitution to include a right to bear arms, they can amend it to take it away.

 

[P@triot]

And if you think the government cannot make you comply with whatever law they make, you're delusional.They can stop Social Security payments for old farts like you, they can garnish wages for young studs like me, they can confiscate your property, pick you up on your way to buying your Viagra and put you in jail. The possibilities are endless!

The boy wonder here - yet to even touch a woman - refers to himself as "young stud"

 

[Pumpkin Row]

The government can NOT regulate abortion, guns, bazookas, and/or vehicles.

Of course they can. Perfectly Constitutional.

No it isn't, no matter what the Supreme Court says.

As Bripat said. As recently revealed, and blatantly obvious through the entirety of the current administration, the Supreme Court doesn't actually care about interpreting the constitution, only about advancing their own political agendas. If they cared about the constitution, they wouldn't have let Obama violate it 64 times.

 

[P@triot]

Tell that to SCOTUS, then.

Oh, they know that already.

But they are corrupt to the core.

Has their rulings affected "drug" consumption in these US of A?

Well , neither will their edict preventing us from bearing arms.

.

Congress absolutely has the right to regulate guns. That was decided in the 1930s, and confirmed with Heller.

And if you think the government cannot make you comply with whatever law they make, you're delusional.

They can stop Social Security payments for old farts like you, they can garnish wages for young studs like me, they can confiscate your property, pick you up on your way to buying your Viagra and put you in jail.

The possibilities are endless!

Only for people like you who are too illiterate to read the U.S. Constitution. For the rest of us, everything you just said is 100% false and the asinine ramblings of an idiot.

You know that the 2nd is an 'amendment', don't you? Maybe you should look up that word, because you're babbling.

So if they could amend the Constitution to include a right to bear arms, they can amend it to take it away.

You're right. But that's the only way they can take away firearms. But they haven't done that, they can't do that, and they won't do that. It requires 2/3 of the House, 2/3 of the Senate, and 3/4 of the states to legally amend the U.S. Constitution. Best of luck with that!

 

[P@triot]

The government can NOT regulate abortion, guns, bazookas, and/or vehicles.

Of course they can. Perfectly Constitutional.

No it isn't, no matter what the Supreme Court says.

As Bripat said. As recently revealed, and blatantly obvious through the entirety of the current administration, the Supreme Court doesn't actually care about interpreting the constitution, only about advancing their own political agendas. If they cared about the constitution, they wouldn't have let Obama violate it 64 times.

I can see why liberals here get so frustrated with you - you're literally a billion times more educated than these high school dropouts and societal parasites...

 

[bripat9643]

Tell that to SCOTUS, then.

Oh, they know that already.

But they are corrupt to the core.

Has their rulings affected "drug" consumption in these US of A?

Well , neither will their edict preventing us from bearing arms.

.

Congress absolutely has the right to regulate guns. That was decided in the 1930s, and confirmed with Heller.

And if you think the government cannot make you comply with whatever law they make, you're delusional.

They can stop Social Security payments for old farts like you, they can garnish wages for young studs like me, they can confiscate your property, pick you up on your way to buying your Viagra and put you in jail.

The possibilities are endless!

Only for people like you who are too illiterate to read the U.S. Constitution. For the rest of us, everything you just said is 100% false and the asinine ramblings of an idiot.

You know that the 2nd is an 'amendment', don't you? Maybe you should look up that word, because you're babbling.

So if they could amend the Constitution to include a right to bear arms, they can amend it to take it away.

Yes they can. Good luck with that.

 

[P@triot]

The government can NOT regulate abortion, guns, bazookas, and/or vehicles.

Of course they can. Perfectly Constitutional.

No it isn't, no matter what the Supreme Court says.

Synthia is dealing with both some illiteracy issues and some gender confusion issues. You'll have to forgive it for speaking from a place of astounding ignorance.

 

[Contumacious]

Tell that to SCOTUS, then.

Oh, they know that already.

But they are corrupt to the core.

Has their rulings affected "drug" consumption in these US of A?

Well , neither will their edict preventing us from bearing arms.

.

Congress absolutely has the right to regulate guns. That was decided in the 1930s, and confirmed with Heller.

And if you think the government cannot make you comply with whatever law they make, you're delusional.

They can stop Social Security payments for old farts like you, they can garnish wages for young studs like me, they can confiscate your property, pick you up on your way to buying your Viagra and put you in jail.

The possibilities are endless!

Only for people like you who are too illiterate to read the U.S. Constitution. For the rest of us, everything you just said is 100% false and the asinine ramblings of an idiot.

You know that the 2nd is an 'amendment', don't you? Maybe you should look up that word, because you're babbling.

So if they could amend the Constitution to include a right to bear arms, they can amend it to take it away.

SCOTUS has recognized that the right to defend our lives is EXTRA CONSTITUTIONAL. UNALIENABLE. NOT DEPENDENT ON THE CONSTITUTION FOR ITS EXISTENCE


So in conclusion , we will buy them from a licensed dealer or from a blackmarketeer.


WE WILL NOT BE DISARMED.


.

 

[Synthaholic]

Hey you ignorant little fuck - if (and I quote) "a goddamn gun only real focus is to KILL" do law enforcement officers carry them?!? Are they paid assassins?!?

You literally get dumber with each post.

In case they have to kill. Duh!

You have no business calling anyone else dumb, retard.

Why would a police officer ever need to kill, you mental midget?!? They have a numbers advantage, they have handcuffs, mace, tactical batons, and even major non-lethal weapons like tasers which completely and totally incapacitate people.

Holy shit, you ARE a retard!

If someone was running toward a police officer with a machete in one hand and a can of pepper spray that shoots a stream up to 15 feet away in the other none of those items would be effective.




Now say something else stupid.

 

[P@triot]

Tell that to SCOTUS, then.

Oh, they know that already.

But they are corrupt to the core.

Has their rulings affected "drug" consumption in these US of A?

Well , neither will their edict preventing us from bearing arms.

.

Congress absolutely has the right to regulate guns. That was decided in the 1930s, and confirmed with Heller.

And if you think the government cannot make you comply with whatever law they make, you're delusional.

They can stop Social Security payments for old farts like you, they can garnish wages for young studs like me, they can confiscate your property, pick you up on your way to buying your Viagra and put you in jail.

The possibilities are endless!

Only for people like you who are too illiterate to read the U.S. Constitution. For the rest of us, everything you just said is 100% false and the asinine ramblings of an idiot.

You know that the 2nd is an 'amendment', don't you? Maybe you should look up that word, because you're babbling.

So if they could amend the Constitution to include a right to bear arms, they can amend it to take it away.

SCOTUS has recognized that the right to defend our lives is EXTRA CONSTITUTIONAL. UNALIENABLE. NOT DEPENDENT ON THE CONSTITUTION FOR ITS EXISTENCE
So in conclusion , we will buy it from a licensed dealer or from a blackmarketeer.
WE WILL NOT BE DISARMED.

You have to understand - with the exception of C_Clayton_Jones, nobody knows less about the U.S. Constitution than Synthy here. Just laugh when you read it's nonsense about how the government has "unlimited" powers.

 

[Synthaholic]

Gun Aficionados

Exactly. Thank you.