Free birth control

[frigidweirdo]

http://www.bustle.com/articles/9528...riment-proves-the-whole-country-needs-free-bc

They did it in Colorado, seems it reduced abortions, reduced unwanted pregnancies, reduced healthcare spending etc.

"According to a study published in October 2014, unintended pregnancies dropped in the state by 40 percent from 2009-2013, and abortion fell by 42 percent over the same period."

"The program saved the state millions in public health coverage for unintended pregnancies, further proving the well-known fact that preventative care is cost-effective and sensible health policy."

Question, what did Republicans do to a program that saves money, reduces problems, and reduces abortion?

"Colorado Republicans succeeded in shooting it down, leaving the program in peril."

The question is, WHY???? Why would someone take something that WORKS on many levels and destroy it just so they can go around preaching their nonsense to others? They want to stop abortion, well this reduces abortion, but without abortion they've got nothing to get people hysterical about, so no one would vote for them if abortion isn't an issue.

 

[TNHarley]

"free"? LOL

 

[TNHarley]

Lefties : always wondering around in other peoples bedrooms

 

[yiostheoy]

One of the sorority girls I dated during college daze told me all Girl Scouts are supposed to bring their own condoms.

Condoms are cheap -- not quite free but almost.

Beats a medical bill too.

 

[SmokeALib]

License to screw your brains out.

 

[deltex1]

Bananas for the women. Warm watermelons for the men....yo.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

"free"? LOL

Not free to the Taxpayer but question should be ask if it is cheaper to give out free birth control or would you prefer the taxpayer pay for the unwanted bundle of joy?

Me personally I believe it should be taught that guys should keep their penis in their pants and women should resist the urge to let the guy penis in their panties, but the reality is humans are stupid, so why not take the cheaper route until humans learn that screwing without protection is never wise unless you want a child and can afford it...

I know how dare I write such nonsense and try to be fucking reasonable!

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

http://www.bustle.com/articles/9528...riment-proves-the-whole-country-needs-free-bc

They did it in Colorado, seems it reduced abortions, reduced unwanted pregnancies, reduced healthcare spending etc.

"According to a study published in October 2014, unintended pregnancies dropped in the state by 40 percent from 2009-2013, and abortion fell by 42 percent over the same period."

"The program saved the state millions in public health coverage for unintended pregnancies, further proving the well-known fact that preventative care is cost-effective and sensible health policy."

Question, what did Republicans do to a program that saves money, reduces problems, and reduces abortion?

"Colorado Republicans succeeded in shooting it down, leaving the program in peril."

The question is, WHY???? Why would someone take something that WORKS on many levels and destroy it just so they can go around preaching their nonsense to others? They want to stop abortion, well this reduces abortion, but without abortion they've got nothing to get people hysterical about, so no one would vote for them if abortion isn't an issue.

OK, who's going to pay for the free birth control?

 

[1stRambo]

http://www.bustle.com/articles/9528...riment-proves-the-whole-country-needs-free-bc

They did it in Colorado, seems it reduced abortions, reduced unwanted pregnancies, reduced healthcare spending etc.

"According to a study published in October 2014, unintended pregnancies dropped in the state by 40 percent from 2009-2013, and abortion fell by 42 percent over the same period."

"The program saved the state millions in public health coverage for unintended pregnancies, further proving the well-known fact that preventative care is cost-effective and sensible health policy."

Question, what did Republicans do to a program that saves money, reduces problems, and reduces abortion?

"Colorado Republicans succeeded in shooting it down, leaving the program in peril."

The question is, WHY???? Why would someone take something that WORKS on many levels and destroy it just so they can go around preaching their nonsense to others? They want to stop abortion, well this reduces abortion, but without abortion they've got nothing to get people hysterical about, so no one would vote for them if abortion isn't an issue.

Yo, who could afford a baby? It`s the "Economy Stupid!!!"

"GTP"
Let`s Pray For You, And That Tiny Brain With Gods Help!

 

[TNHarley]

"free"? LOL

Not free to the Taxpayer but question should be ask if it is cheaper to give out free birth control or would you prefer the taxpayer pay for the unwanted bundle of joy?

Me personally I believe it should be taught that guys should keep their penis in their pants and women should resist the urge to let the guy penis in their panties, but the reality is humans are stupid, so why not take the cheaper route until humans learn that screwing without protection is never wise unless you want a child and can afford it...

I know how dare I write such nonsense and try to be fucking reasonable!

I get that. I have used that argument myself for consistency reasons. (abortion)
How reasonable is it, REALLY, considering our government shouldn't be doing anything like that to begin with?

 

[ogibillm]

"free"? LOL

good god you're dumb.

you want to complain about the cost of giving out contraception while ignoring the costs that unwanted pregnancies have on a state.

do you not understand how idiotic that is? you'd rather pay $5 later over $1 today because of the use of the word 'free?'

 

[JBond]

"free"? LOL

good god you're dumb.

you want to complain about the cost of giving out contraception while ignoring the costs that unwanted pregnancies have on a state.

do you not understand how idiotic that is? you'd rather pay $5 later over $1 today because of the use of the word 'free?'

I think "tax payer provided" would be more accurate than "free". Free is very misleading. Kind of like offering free college and free medical care. None of it is free. Someone has to pay for it. I do agree it is cheaper before than after.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

"free"? LOL

Not free to the Taxpayer but question should be ask if it is cheaper to give out free birth control or would you prefer the taxpayer pay for the unwanted bundle of joy?

Me personally I believe it should be taught that guys should keep their penis in their pants and women should resist the urge to let the guy penis in their panties, but the reality is humans are stupid, so why not take the cheaper route until humans learn that screwing without protection is never wise unless you want a child and can afford it...

I know how dare I write such nonsense and try to be fucking reasonable!

I get that. I have used that argument myself for consistency reasons. (abortion)
How reasonable is it, REALLY, considering our government shouldn't be doing anything like that to begin with?

Should the government be in the business of abortion?

No...

Should the woman have the right to have an abortion?

That is her personal choice as long as I do not pay for the damn thing one way or the other...

Condom is cheaper than abortion or raising the unwanted bundle of joy, and today I wish the two freaks that made me had used a condom or at least a coat hanger!

( Don't say I don't mean it because I am one pissed off fucker today if you can not tell )

 

[1stRambo]

"free"? LOL

good god you're dumb.

you want to complain about the cost of giving out contraception while ignoring the costs that unwanted pregnancies have on a state.

do you not understand how idiotic that is? you'd rather pay $5 later over $1 today because of the use of the word 'free?'

Yo, if you can`t afford a baby? Keep your legs closed! """Simple"""

And if you do get pregnant? You figure out what and how you handle it, even if you die on the side of the street! Screw paying for these incompetent people!

The WANT, WANT, WANT, WANT, Socialist Democrat Party!!!

"GTP"

 

[BluesLegend]

"free"? LOL

How many times do we have to point out to dumb as a brick liberals that this shit is not free.

 

[Seawytch]

"free"? LOL

How many times do we have to point out to dumb as a brick liberals that this shit is not free.

You're the one being "dumb as a brick". People that support these programs know they are paid for by taxes. We also know that these preventative programs save considerable taxpayer money.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[BluesLegend]

"free"? LOL

How many times do we have to point out to dumb as a brick liberals that this shit is not free.

You're the one being "dumb as a brick". People that support these programs know they are paid for by taxes. We also know that these preventative programs save considerable taxpayer money.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So stop LYING its not free. Here's an idea keep your dick in your pants, your legs closed if you can't afford your own damn birth control. God its like being swarmed by blood sucking vampire bats having to pay for everyone's 'free' shit.

 

[TNHarley]

"free"? LOL

good god you're dumb.

you want to complain about the cost of giving out contraception while ignoring the costs that unwanted pregnancies have on a state.

do you not understand how idiotic that is? you'd rather pay $5 later over $1 today because of the use of the word 'free?'

good god you are retarded. How in the fuck did you get that from me pointing out the "free" fallacy?

 

[TNHarley]

"free"? LOL

Not free to the Taxpayer but question should be ask if it is cheaper to give out free birth control or would you prefer the taxpayer pay for the unwanted bundle of joy?

Me personally I believe it should be taught that guys should keep their penis in their pants and women should resist the urge to let the guy penis in their panties, but the reality is humans are stupid, so why not take the cheaper route until humans learn that screwing without protection is never wise unless you want a child and can afford it...

I know how dare I write such nonsense and try to be fucking reasonable!

I get that. I have used that argument myself for consistency reasons. (abortion)
How reasonable is it, REALLY, considering our government shouldn't be doing anything like that to begin with?

Should the government be in the business of abortion?

No...

Should the woman have the right to have an abortion?

That is her personal choice as long as I do not pay for the damn thing one way or the other...

Condom is cheaper than abortion or raising the unwanted bundle of joy, and today I wish the two freaks that made me had used a condom or at least a coat hanger!

( Don't say I don't mean it because I am one pissed off fucker today if you can not tell )

I can tell. You have been an ass to me all day!

 

[Conservative65]

http://www.bustle.com/articles/9528...riment-proves-the-whole-country-needs-free-bc

They did it in Colorado, seems it reduced abortions, reduced unwanted pregnancies, reduced healthcare spending etc.

"According to a study published in October 2014, unintended pregnancies dropped in the state by 40 percent from 2009-2013, and abortion fell by 42 percent over the same period."

"The program saved the state millions in public health coverage for unintended pregnancies, further proving the well-known fact that preventative care is cost-effective and sensible health policy."

Question, what did Republicans do to a program that saves money, reduces problems, and reduces abortion?

"Colorado Republicans succeeded in shooting it down, leaving the program in peril."

The question is, WHY???? Why would someone take something that WORKS on many levels and destroy it just so they can go around preaching their nonsense to others? They want to stop abortion, well this reduces abortion, but without abortion they've got nothing to get people hysterical about, so no one would vote for them if abortion isn't an issue.

If what a woman does with her body is her choice, why is it someone else's responsibility to provide her with things related to that choice?

If those things are provided to her for "free" yet she still gets pregnant, will she refuse to have an abortion?