Europeans and Humanity Wake up to who really has the power

[Baron]

Are you a CIA agent promoting division?

It looks like Shulchan Aruch promotes more division

Rabbi Rashi, who was highly regarded by the Jews in regard to the words of Moses: "You shall not eat the meat that is torn by the beast in the field; you shall throw it to the dogs," remarked: "And he (the goyim) must be regarded as a dog. ... And if this is so, why does the Torah say: throw meat to the dogs? To teach you that a dog deserves more respect than a goy."[1]

"Children of Akum cannot be and are not even comparable to illegitimate or idiotic Jews" (Shulhan Aruch, Eben ha-etzer 1, 1).[2]

"Only those who are called human beings can be considered witnesses. As for an Akum, or a Jew, who became an Akum and who is even worse than the (natural) Akum, then they can not be considered human, and therefore, their testimony is meaningless" (Shulhan Aruch, Hashen ha-Mishpat 34, 19).[3]

A complete list of these commandments can hardly fit on a thousand pages.

 

[Thoth001]

It looks like Shulchan Aruch promotes more division

Rabbi Rashi, who was highly regarded by the Jews in regard to the words of Moses: "You shall not eat the meat that is torn by the beast in the field; you shall throw it to the dogs," remarked: "And he (the goyim) must be regarded as a dog. ... And if this is so, why does the Torah say: throw meat to the dogs? To teach you that a dog deserves more respect than a goy."[1]

"Children of Akum cannot be and are not even comparable to illegitimate or idiotic Jews" (Shulhan Aruch, Eben ha-etzer 1, 1).[2]

"Only those who are called human beings can be considered witnesses. As for an Akum, or a Jew, who became an Akum and who is even worse than the (natural) Akum, then they can not be considered human, and therefore, their testimony is meaningless" (Shulhan Aruch, Hashen ha-Mishpat 34, 19).[3]

A complete list of these commandments can hardly fit on a thousand pages.

Have you ever read any books from the Hindu writings that some of these words were based on?

 

[Baron]

So you are mixing Christianity with democracy... I am confused. Didn't Christianity have the biggest tyrants? Have you ever heard of a Republic where everyone has their views but the Republic makes sure their views are allowed.. I am glad you have these views because some people have these views and should be able to speak it. Do you believe in censoring views?

Satanists want to kill all peoples with their frigging 'jab'
How your f.... 'democracy' practically works we can enjoy daily by CONvid-1984 Scamdemic 'measures'
If Europa would run by monarchs no Scamdemic would be possible
All parties, presstitutes, parliaments are controlled by satanists behind, so let to abolish them

 

[Baron]

Have you ever read any books from the Hindu writings that some of these words were based on?

Hindus don't practically apply them
How Shulhan Aruch is applied today you can ask for example Palestinians or Non-Jews in Israel

65 Israeli laws that discriminate against non-Jews

Immediately after taking power in 1933, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party — commonly known as the Nazi Party — began a program called “Aryanization” to strip Jews of their rights. The intent was to make Germany an “Aryan” state, using “laws” to force Jews to leave. The Nazis adopted...

www.arabnews.com

Discrimination Against Palestinian Citizens of Israel | IMEU

The Institute for Middle East Understanding (IMEU) is a non-profit organization that offers journalists facts, analysis, experts, and digital resources about Palestine and Palestinians.

imeu.org

Human rights in Israel - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Racism: In Israel some Jews are more equal than others

Ethiopian Jews have suffered discrimination by the Israeli state, which has been intelligent enough to divide ethnic groups to ensure there will never be a joint fight against racism.

www.trtworld.com

Crime and the Criminal #2: Ten Reasons Israel is Guilty of the Crime of Apartheid

Amnesty International is the latest human rights group to accuse Israel of apartheid

frankowen.substack.com

There are more as 185,000 such links


Never read about in western presstitute 'medias'?

 

[Baron]

No one Monarch would let to kill its people like western corrupted 'leaders' it do now.
All 'democracies' shall be replaced by monarchies NOW otherwise in few years we will have new Scamdemics, much worst and deadly

. A monarchy is regarded as one of the most stable forms of government.
A constitutional monarchy is less prone to a forced takeover of the government when compared to other arrangements because it provides a dual support structure. You have the side that includes all of the elected or appointed officials that govern over legislation and the daily tasks of governing. Then you have the monarch who serves as the head of state in some manner.

If the country feels that their government is no longer rendering them with what they require, then there is the opportunity to select new officials or request for a change in appointments.

2. Monarchies reduce the levels of political divide in a country.
Monarchy governments reduce the political arguing that takes place within a homeland. There are still fierce assemblages who pursue specific agendas, but there isn’t the same kind of gridlock seen in the various houses of government as there are in other approaches.

It is the ruler in most monarchies who will have the final say on all matters within the executive, judicial, and legislative branches of the government. That requires the elected officials to recommend strategies that fall in line with what the sovereignty desires.

3. Most monarchies rule from a centrist approach.
A monarchy does run the risk of having a dictator at the helm of government, exploiting the population for their personal benefit. Most of these rulers tend to come from a centrist approach because that is the easiest way to bring people together. There is more willingness to compromise because there is another layer of approval that must be obtained before something becomes law in almost all governments. Once the prime minister or equivalent supports an idea, then the sovereign must also sign off on what will happen – even if their role is not overly influential in the government.

4. It is possible to reduce or eliminate corruption within the boundaries of a monarchy.
Any government official, such as a king, queen, caliph, emperor, tsar, caliph, sultan, or khan can be corrupt. What is different in the world’s long-standing monarchies is that the ruler has nothing to gain by using the government to their benefit. They are the government. That means these rules benefit in numerous ways by holding the position. In return, the nation typically identifies with the ruler, and this creates a mutually beneficial relationship.

5. There are opportunities to refresh the government.
Since most monarchies take the constitutional approach in our world today, then there is an incentive to stay engaged with what the population needs within the country. If bureaucrats can secure themselves into a long-term status of service, then there is no longer the urge to stay actively involved with their communities. Because of the structure of this monarchy, there are occasions to alter who gets to participate in the government. This advantage allows for fresh viewpoints on different commissions, updated community representation, and better communication regarding the governing process.

Even though the monarch cannot be voted out in most government structures, every other position could be changed systematically to remove the menace of complacency.

6. Monarchy leaders are trained from birth to become leaders.
The order of succession is established in a monarchy based on the birth order within the family under most structures. This option allows everyone, including the people, the opportunity to understand who their next ruler will be. It also provides the ruling group a chance to train the new ruler thoroughly before they take the throne. That allows even young rulers to be experienced in the ways of government so that they can make a positive, immediate impact for their country in their role as the head of state.

7. The government can move faster when implementing decisions with a monarchy.
Democratic governments tend to operate with speed when the action benefits those elected to office in some way. The 2018 meeting of the legislature and Senate in Washington State is an example of this fact, with both bodies passing multiple bills within an hour of each other so that the officials could limit their liability with regards to new state privacy laws with a veto-proof margin.

State funding for education in Washington State took several years to complete instead, with the judicial branch fining the legislative one $100,000 per day because of their inaction. When you consider the advantages of a monarchy, then the fact that one person makes all decisions improves the pace of implementation. This benefit allows the administration to be more responsive whenever there is a need.

8. There are fewer transfers of power that happen in monarchy governments.
There is a complete transfer of power in the United States in every 4-year or 8-year cycle depending on the Presidential election. Some elections come every two years under the American system, which means there are fewer opportunities to maintain consistency in governing. Even FDR, who served four consecutive terms before passing away in office, was limited to less than 20 years of serving the people.

A monarchy is usually in place for life. When you consider the multiple generations in a family that can stay in power, then there is more consistency in the approach to governing. That means long-term plans have a better chance of implementation under this government structure.

9. A monarchy works to support a nation’s cultural identity.
The Commonwealth realm may allow for extensive self-governing over its 16 different states, but this fact does not change the overall structure of the government. Each person in the domain, which stretches from the UK to Canada to the South Pacific, intensely identifies with their administrative structure. Their monarchy helps to define who they are as a people because of the approaches they see their leadership practicing. If there is an effort to cooperate and unify, then these are the core values that become an indispensable part of a nation’s cultural identity.

10. Monarchies can apply more money toward the economy and their people.
Elections can be a costly event in any country that holds them. The average price of a presidential election in the United States is more than $2 billion. When you add in the hundreds of House and Senate elections at the national level, then another $4 billion goes into the cost of putting people into government positions. When there is a monarchy in place, then this need is greatly reduced – or even eliminated.

Monarchies do have a reputation of hoarding wealth for the ruling family, but this issue is seen more with dictatorships today instead of as a general rule. Queen Elizabeth has an estimated private wealth of $530 million, or about 25% of the cost of a single U.S. presidential election.

11. The government can operate independently of the monarchy in some structures.
Although the constitutional version of a monarchy can grant almost unlimited powers to the leadership, most of these governments decide to give only a reserve power to this person or family. This process is what creates the head of state position, allowing the sovereign to serve in an ambassadorial role instead. There is still the authority to request revisions on any legislative agenda that they feel is unsuitable.

It is a process that can also maintain the authority of the government during a leadership transition that extends beyond the natural lineage. In an emergency, constitutional monarchies even provide a secondary layer of leadership that keeps the government operating while remaining helpful in its oversight role.

22 Advantages and Disadvantages of Monarchy

A monarchy is a form of government where a single person, designated as the monarch, serves as the head of state until they choose to abdicate or death. The governing power of this individual may

futureofworking.com

 

[Baron]

So you are mixing Christianity with democracy... I am confused. Didn't Christianity have the biggest tyrants? Have you ever heard of a Republic where everyone has their views but the Republic makes sure their views are allowed.. I am glad you have these views because some people have these views and should be able to speak it. Do you believe in censoring views?

Do you know a monarch through the history which would allow a bunch of insane lunatics to kill own people?

 

[Baron]

The danger of Scamdemic CONvid 1984 2.0 in few years as very high.

Peoples shall abolish corrupted 'democracies' and replace all of them with Theocracies and Christian Monarchies now
All parties are corrupt and liars,all politicians are liars, elections make no change, the 'democracy' system became completely insane and brain dead.

The Holy Bible shall be the only Main Law and Constitution

 

[Ringo]

German Foreign Minister Annalena Berbock: The termination of energy supplies from Russia to Ukraine is worse than a tank attack.
What an evil woman! In one sentence, she zeroed out all the evidence, that Russia is going to attack Ukraine.
It will be enough just to close the gas valve!