EU Deploys Troops To Greenland

Trump said it was gonna happen.

It's not a hostile takeover, IMO. It's just, "We are here"

I’m curious. It looks like those NATO forces could be there as a deterrent to any prospective movement by US forces. However, maybe NATO forces are actually there for another reason.

I wonder if they are there as a kind of trip-wire against the forces of any OTHER nation making a move to that geostrategic location.

If Russia were to make that move, now, assuming NATO tries to repulse them, then wouldn’t the US ALSO SEND FORCES as required by Arricle 5?
 
Last edited:
I’m curious. It looks like those NATO Forves could be there as a deterrent to any prospective movement by NATO forces. However, maybe NATO forces are actually there for another reason.

I wonder if they are there as a kind of trip-wire against the forces of any OTHER nation making a move to that geo strategic location.

If Russia were to make that move, now, assuming NATO tries to repulse them, then wouldn’t the US ALSO SEND FORCES as required by Arricle 5?

You are posting in a manner that leads one to believe that NATO has "forces" that do not include us.
 
This is more than any stats you got. And we do not know if they are true. We have saved Europe twice. We have helped o protect the continent also for many decades. This helped them to be more socialist as they did not pay as much for other things like defense. We get Greenland this will make it even.
We were able to help because of our friendly neighbors north and south and large bodies of water east and west. BTW, I like my Socialist Medicare and Social Security.
 
You are posting in a manner that leads one to believe that NATO has "forces" that do not include us.
No shirt, shitlock. :)

Everybody has troops that don't answer directly to NATO or include us.

I assume you were trying to make a funny.

I don't get it :dunno:
 
A war with NATO would consist of the US closing the bank on funding. NATO would cease to exist overnight.
BS. The US is not funding NATO. The requirement is that each country spend a certain percentage of its GDP on their own military, not that each country gives NATO money. What Trump has been basically bitching about is that some of the other countries have not spent as much on their military as we do.
 
Trump said it was gonna happen.
Notice that these countries did not deploy until America said they were interested in Greenland. Russia and China have been eyeing Greenland as a strategic location for years and nothing from the EU. Answers once again that while the USA has been sending money, troops and aid to all these countries forever and a day, where would they be if America ever needed their help.

"From today, there will be an expanded military presence in and around Greenland — in close cooperation with NATO allies.
The USA is a NATO allie, the biggest and most important one.

The purpose is to train the ability to operate under the unique Arctic conditions and to strengthen the alliance’s footprint in the Arctic, benefiting both European and transatlantic security," it added.
Note there was no mention of benefiting any American security. Let these countries stroke off; do they really think sending a couple dozen troops there would really deter any country, the USA, Russia or China, from just walking right in there and take the whole place over? :auiqs.jpg:
 
We were able to help because of our friendly neighbors north and south and large bodies of water east and west. BTW, I like my Socialist Medicare and Social Security.
And us making sure we control the western hemisphere will keep the social security and Medicare resources flowing.
 
BS. The US is not funding NATO. The requirement is that each country spend a certain percentage of its GDP on their own military, not that each country gives NATO money. What Trump has been basically bitching about is that some of the other countries have not spent as much on their military as we do.
Of every dollar the world spends on military, 38 cents comes from a country with friendly neighbors north and south and large oceans east and west. Are we the suckers of the world or just cowards?
On the other hand, 90% of Canadians live within a hundred miles of our border, so they just might be planning an invasion. :D
 
  • Winner
Reactions: IM2
15th post
BS. The US is not funding NATO. The requirement is that each country spend a certain percentage of its GDP on their own military, not that each country gives NATO money. What Trump has been basically bitching about is that some of the other countries have not spent as much on their military as we do.
They never meet their requirements
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom