Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 83,318
- 41,700
- 2,615
Is it legal to add Justices?They were within the rules.
How many do you want Tater to add? Give us a number.
You know it is
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is it legal to add Justices?They were within the rules.
How many do you want Tater to add? Give us a number.
No it isn't illegal to add justices, Simp. I never claimed otherwise. What a pathetic dodge by you.Is it legal to add Justices?
You know it is
It’s illegal to add Justices? Show us the statuteNo it isn't illegal to add justices, Simp. I never claimed otherwise. What a pathetic dodge by you.
Was it illegal for Trump to nominate people to fill openings on the court? Since you keep dodging, I'll answer: Nope.
Now, how many do you want Tater to add to the court? Give us a number. try not to dodge.
Never said it was, moron.It’s illegal to add Justices? Show us the statute
So adding Justices is not illegal.Never said it was, moron.
Learn to read.
Holy shit you are stupid.
Once again stupid, I never said it was.So adding Justices is not illegal.
Ok then
I already addressed your inability to read.If it’s not illegal or unconstitutional quit whining
TBDI already addressed your inability to read.
How many do you want Tater to add the the court? Tic.....toc......
Great we're going to fix the damage done to the country by you fucked up leftistsThe Heritage Foundation — a well-funded, influential far-right group in Washington, DC — has been quietly vetting tens of thousands of arch-conservative acolytes to staff up the federal government under the next Republican administration as part of its "Project 2025" presidential transition plan. One scholar of authoritarian movements around the globe is sounding the alarm over what that would mean should former President Donald Trump win a second term in the White House.
During a Saturday segment on MSNBC, New York University professor Ruth Ben-Ghiat told host Ali Velshi that Project 2025 would effectively transform American government from a meritocratic democracy to a regime resembling Vladimir Putin's Russia. She pointed to Heritage's calls to eliminate numerous government agencies that serve as checks on the executive branch as merely one example.
"The essence of authoritarianism is removing restraints on the leader and making him immune from prosecution by domesticating government," Ben-Ghiat said. "And so some of what Project 2025 proposes, like abolishing the DOJ and the FBI is designed for that end, to make it impossible to prosecute Trump and allow him to commit crimes with impunity."
More at the link below...
![]()
'Essence of authoritarianism': Expert warns 'Project 2025' would create a Trump 'autocracy'
The Heritage Foundation — a well-funded, influential far-right group in Washington, DC — has been quietly vetting tens of thousands of arch-conservative acolytes to staff up the federal government under the next Republican administration as part of its "Project 2025" presidential transition...www.alternet.org
Sounds ominous to me! What do you think?
TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS
So you were just talking out of your ass.......................again.
Go for it.So you successfully stacked the court to your satisfaction
Time for Dems to do the same
Stacked the court? No we made it constitutional again you wouldn't have the bullshit in New York if it was a constitutional courtSo you successfully stacked the court to your satisfaction
Time for Dems to do the same