- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,463
- 32,441
- 2,300
No it isn't. You right wingers are making that up and projecting on the left. The left knows how to read and understand words unlike the parrots on the right wing.Definition of EQUITY The definition pushed by the left is equity of outcome regardless of effort.Not even if that form of equality requires equity? It took a Civil War to achieve equity instead of less expensive equality, in that case.I agree that it should be more about this form of equality as equity:You mean like, righting a wrong?Nope; that is affirmative action not "equity".Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?
Because equity in this case implies you give one side an advantage due to perceived slights in the past on the part of the other side.
Equity has a component that can be added to, equality cannot.
at my expense, when I wasn't even born during the wrong, or had anything to do with it?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
Equity is not equality.
now you are just playing with words and not caring about the meaning of them.
In law, the term "equity" refers to a particular set of remedies and associated procedures involved with civil law. These equitable doctrines and procedures are distinguished from "legal" ones. While legal remedies typically involve monetary damages, equitable relief typically refers to injunctions, specific performance, or vacatur. A court will typically award equitable remedies when a legal remedy is insufficient or inadequate. For example, courts will typically award equitable relief for a claim which involves a particular or unique piece of real estate, or if the plaintiff requests specific performance.--https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/equity
From the biggest word fucker upper on this board that is comical.