Equity is not Equality

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

if the situation warrants it?

Raciss!!!

I am disabled how is a disability a racist subject?

Limiting equity to cases where "the situation warrants it" is obviously racist.

Why would you apply equity where it is not needed?

Don't ask me, ask those pushing for equity.

 

[Moonglow]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

if the situation warrants it?

Raciss!!!

I am disabled how is a disability a racist subject?

Limiting equity to cases where "the situation warrants it" is obviously racist.

Why would you apply equity where it is not needed?

Don't ask me, ask those pushing for equity.

I posted what "equity" was defined as in the EO yet you don't know. You just failed class, clown...

 

[Lastamender]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

if the situation warrants it?

Raciss!!!

I am disabled how is a disability a racist subject?

We have disability programs. They take care of any problem you might have and give financial aid. We do not need what is just a redistribution of wealth necessary to install any Socialist or Communist agenda.

It is clearly what this enables.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

if the situation warrants it?

Raciss!!!

I am disabled how is a disability a racist subject?

Limiting equity to cases where "the situation warrants it" is obviously racist.

Why would you apply equity where it is not needed?

Don't ask me, ask those pushing for equity.

I posted what "equity" was defined as in the EO yet you don't know. You just failed class, clown...

Don't ask me to get into the minds of those nutjobs.

 

[Moonglow]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

if the situation warrants it?

Raciss!!!

I am disabled how is a disability a racist subject?

We have disability programs. They take care of any problem you might have and give financial aid. We do not need what is just a redistribution of wealth necessary to install any Socialist or Communist agenda.

If they install a communist agenda how will I goose step to it?

There are no programs in the rural areas where I live and that is what this EO is trying to administer to...It has nothing to do with a political ideology of mass consumption or mass indoctrination.

 

[Moonglow]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

if the situation warrants it?

Raciss!!!

I am disabled how is a disability a racist subject?

We have disability programs. They take care of any problem you might have and give financial aid. We do not need what is just a redistribution of wealth necessary to install any Socialist or Communist agenda.

If they install a communist agenda how will I goose step to it?

There are no programs in the rural areas where I live and that is what this EO is trying to administer to...It has nothing to do with a political ideology of mass consumption or mass indoctrination.

It is no harder than Ohm's law.

 

[Lastamender]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

if the situation warrants it?

Raciss!!!

I am disabled how is a disability a racist subject?

We have disability programs. They take care of any problem you might have and give financial aid. We do not need what is just a redistribution of wealth necessary to install any Socialist or Communist agenda.

If they install a communist agenda how will I goose step to it?

There are no programs in the rural areas where I live and that is what this EO is trying to administer to...It has nothing to do with a political ideology of mass consumption or mass indoctrination.

That is your problem. I just told you there is help out there. What else can I do for you?

 

[Moonglow]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

if the situation warrants it?

Raciss!!!

I am disabled how is a disability a racist subject?

We have disability programs. They take care of any problem you might have and give financial aid. We do not need what is just a redistribution of wealth necessary to install any Socialist or Communist agenda.

If they install a communist agenda how will I goose step to it?

There are no programs in the rural areas where I live and that is what this EO is trying to administer to...It has nothing to do with a political ideology of mass consumption or mass indoctrination.

That is your problem. I just told you there is help out there. What else can I do for you?

You could try empathy but I don't think you are capable of that emotion.

 

[Concerned American]

Biden's Culture War Aggression

He may have needlessly crippled his chances for lowering the temperature already.

andrewsullivan.substack.com

In critical theory, as James Lindsay explains, “‘equality’ means that citizen A and citizen B are treated equally, while ‘equity’ means adjusting shares in order to make citizen A and B equal.” Here’s how Biden defines “equity”: “the consistent and systematic fair, just, and impartial treatment of all individuals, including individuals who belong to underserved communities that have been denied such treatment, such as Black, Latino, and Indigenous and Native American persons, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and other persons of color; members of religious minorities; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) persons; persons with disabilities; persons who live in rural areas; and persons otherwise adversely affected by persistent poverty or inequality.”

In less tortured English, equity means giving the the named identity groups a specific advantage in treatment by the federal government over other groups — in order to make up for historic injustice and “systemic” oppression. Without “equity”, the argument runs, there can be no real “equality of opportunity.” Equity therefore comes first. Until equity is reached, equality is postponed — perhaps for ever.

Does everyone understand that? If you do, why would you want it? Just curious. This should be good.

Equality is my ex-coworker and I both having the opportunity to buy a house that we could pay off over the course of our careers so we would have our retirement funds free from housing costs. Equity is me sacrificing to pay for my house, my ex-coworker buying new cars and taking expensive vacations and then expecting to have his retirement funds supplemented so that he could enjoy the same quality of life that I sacrificed to achieve. That's a real world example. One of my ex-coworkers was complaining that I could now afford nice cars and a affluent lifestyle because I no longer had to pay rent or mortgage like he did. The funny thing is that I advised him over twenty years ago to buy a house of condo so he wouldn't have rent to pay after he retired and he ridiculed me at the time saying that a mortgage was "a waste of money".

And flushing his money down the shitter to pay someone else's mortgage wasn't a waste of money. Over the last ten years anyone that could afford rent could afford a mortgage.

 

[Concerned American]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

if the situation warrants it?

Raciss!!!

No one is claiming the Japanese receiving reparations for a lack of equity was racist.

Only a moron would compare the two.

 

[Lastamender]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

if the situation warrants it?

Raciss!!!

I am disabled how is a disability a racist subject?

We have disability programs. They take care of any problem you might have and give financial aid. We do not need what is just a redistribution of wealth necessary to install any Socialist or Communist agenda.

If they install a communist agenda how will I goose step to it?

There are no programs in the rural areas where I live and that is what this EO is trying to administer to...It has nothing to do with a political ideology of mass consumption or mass indoctrination.

That is your problem. I just told you there is help out there. What else can I do for you?

You could try empathy but I don't think you are capable of that emotion.

Virtue signaling? Empathy is a private matter. It should not be exploited for political reasons. And the amount of it is not to be determined by anyone else but that person who is expressing or not expressing it.

It is petty what you do. Don't you think it is time you realized it?

 

[danielpalos]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

if the situation warrants it?

Raciss!!!

No one is claiming the Japanese receiving reparations for a lack of equity was racist.

Only a moron would compare the two.

I would agree with you but right wingers really are that dumb.

 

[366h34d]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

Because equity of outcome isn't fair to those who work hard for success. It's like having two employees, one works twenty hours a week and the other works forty hours a week getting paid the same amount of money for a week's work.

I doubt very seriously that is their plan.

Is it you, joe? No one cares about their plan. It is the result that counts. One problem that no one mentioned is that who will determine the fairness?

 

[danielpalos]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

if the situation warrants it?

Raciss!!!

I am disabled how is a disability a racist subject?

Limiting equity to cases where "the situation warrants it" is obviously racist.

Why would you apply equity where it is not needed?

Don't ask me, ask those pushing for equity.

You mean like this branch of Government?

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity,

 

[Concerned American]

Biden's Culture War Aggression

He may have needlessly crippled his chances for lowering the temperature already.

andrewsullivan.substack.com

In critical theory, as James Lindsay explains, “‘equality’ means that citizen A and citizen B are treated equally, while ‘equity’ means adjusting shares in order to make citizen A and B equal.” Here’s how Biden defines “equity”: “the consistent and systematic fair, just, and impartial treatment of all individuals, including individuals who belong to underserved communities that have been denied such treatment, such as Black, Latino, and Indigenous and Native American persons, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and other persons of color; members of religious minorities; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) persons; persons with disabilities; persons who live in rural areas; and persons otherwise adversely affected by persistent poverty or inequality.”

In less tortured English, equity means giving the the named identity groups a specific advantage in treatment by the federal government over other groups — in order to make up for historic injustice and “systemic” oppression. Without “equity”, the argument runs, there can be no real “equality of opportunity.” Equity therefore comes first. Until equity is reached, equality is postponed — perhaps for ever.

Does everyone understand that? If you do, why would you want it? Just curious. This should be good.

Not sure why anyone should believe equity means favoritism. The only reason we have this dilemma in the first place is because right wingers are not moral enough to faithfully execute our own supreme law of the land.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Equity is not the law of the land you ******* idiot.

Right wingers are just plain dumb. It can be a challenge to dumb it down enough for right wingers.

Equality is the same opportunities offered equally to all. Equity is you working your ass off for your $15 an hour and Joe Shit the Rag man sitting on his ass watching you and producing nothing but he still gets the same $15 an hour instead of being fired for not working. Equal opportunity does not equate to equal outcome.

 

[danielpalos]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

if the situation warrants it?

Raciss!!!

I am disabled how is a disability a racist subject?

We have disability programs. They take care of any problem you might have and give financial aid. We do not need what is just a redistribution of wealth necessary to install any Socialist or Communist agenda.

If they install a communist agenda how will I goose step to it?

There are no programs in the rural areas where I live and that is what this EO is trying to administer to...It has nothing to do with a political ideology of mass consumption or mass indoctrination.

That is your problem. I just told you there is help out there. What else can I do for you?

Promote the general welfare instead of the general warfare.

 

[Lastamender]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

if the situation warrants it?

Raciss!!!

I am disabled how is a disability a racist subject?

Limiting equity to cases where "the situation warrants it" is obviously racist.

Why would you apply equity where it is not needed?

Don't ask me, ask those pushing for equity.

You mean like this branch of Government?

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity,

The equity there is the way the law will work. It includes everyone. It is inclusive. The equity you want is selective and collectivist. Got that Commie?

 

[danielpalos]

Biden's Culture War Aggression

He may have needlessly crippled his chances for lowering the temperature already.

andrewsullivan.substack.com

In critical theory, as James Lindsay explains, “‘equality’ means that citizen A and citizen B are treated equally, while ‘equity’ means adjusting shares in order to make citizen A and B equal.” Here’s how Biden defines “equity”: “the consistent and systematic fair, just, and impartial treatment of all individuals, including individuals who belong to underserved communities that have been denied such treatment, such as Black, Latino, and Indigenous and Native American persons, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and other persons of color; members of religious minorities; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) persons; persons with disabilities; persons who live in rural areas; and persons otherwise adversely affected by persistent poverty or inequality.”

In less tortured English, equity means giving the the named identity groups a specific advantage in treatment by the federal government over other groups — in order to make up for historic injustice and “systemic” oppression. Without “equity”, the argument runs, there can be no real “equality of opportunity.” Equity therefore comes first. Until equity is reached, equality is postponed — perhaps for ever.

Does everyone understand that? If you do, why would you want it? Just curious. This should be good.

Not sure why anyone should believe equity means favoritism. The only reason we have this dilemma in the first place is because right wingers are not moral enough to faithfully execute our own supreme law of the land.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Equity is not the law of the land you ******* idiot.

Right wingers are just plain dumb. It can be a challenge to dumb it down enough for right wingers.

Equality is the same opportunities offered equally to all. Equity is you working your ass off for your $15 an hour and Joe Shit the Rag man sitting on his ass watching you and producing nothing but he still gets the same $15 an hour instead of being fired for not working. Equal opportunity does not equate to equal outcome.

Making up your own definitions? Equity: the quality of being fair and impartial.

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity,....

 

[danielpalos]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

if the situation warrants it?

Raciss!!!

I am disabled how is a disability a racist subject?

Limiting equity to cases where "the situation warrants it" is obviously racist.

Why would you apply equity where it is not needed?

Don't ask me, ask those pushing for equity.

You mean like this branch of Government?

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity,

The equity there is the way the law will work. It includes everyone. It is inclusive. The equity you want is selective and collectivist. Got that Commie?

How well did that work for John Henry? Fascist.

 

[Lastamender]

Why would you not want to treat people with equity if the situation warrants it?

if the situation warrants it?

Raciss!!!

I am disabled how is a disability a racist subject?

Limiting equity to cases where "the situation warrants it" is obviously racist.

Why would you apply equity where it is not needed?

Don't ask me, ask those pushing for equity.

You mean like this branch of Government?

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity,

The equity there is the way the law will work. It includes everyone. It is inclusive. The equity you want is selective and collectivist. Got that Commie?

How well did that work for John Henry? Fascist.

What does John Henry have to do with this? And what makes me a fascist? A few posts of mine would prove it. Do you have any of my fascist posts you can quote? All my posts are available on my profile page. Have at it.