Equal Protection Of Citizenship Is In A State Of Sedition Because Of Supreme Court Ruling On Abortion

[Monk-Eye]

" Jabber Jaws Yapping For The Thrill Of Feeling Their Own Gums Flap Even With Nothing To Say "

* Equally Adept At Responding In Kind Or In Hostility *

G

I bet you are a 1%er as well, you can’t pretend to be as smart as you are and hurl insults if you aren’t a 1%er. The insulting you do is just a sign of your insecurity and your lack of smarts, we pretty much can see that.

Congress needs to right the wrong of 50 years ago and make a law as it stands the ruling is solid and is law, Congress needs to get off their asses and do something.

As you are unable to explain Blackmun's statement , " ' Logically, of course, a legitimate state interest in this area need not stand or fall on acceptance of the belief that life begins at conception or at some other point prior to live birth." , the basis for abortion is a birth requirement for equal protection by us 14th amendment , along with limits of state interest to protection of negative liberties for those entitled to equal protection by us 9th amendment , and in not violating us 1st amendment establishment clause by sanctimonious zealots lacking an understanding that state interests are limited to whether a wright to life exists and not whether a life exists .

The basis for abortion is not dependent upon a belief in populism that democracy should be tyranny by majority at the federal or state level , rather than in individualism .

SCOTUS has committed sedition by authorizing states to issue force against implementation us 1st , 9th and 14th amendments as law , and ignorance of the law is not an excuse .

 

[Papageorgio]

" Jabber Jaws Yapping For The Thrill Of Feeling Their Own Gums Flap Even With Nothing To Say "

* Equally Adept At Responding In Kind Or In Hostility *


As you are unable to explain Blackmun's statement , " ' Logically, of course, a legitimate state interest in this area need not stand or fall on acceptance of the belief that life begins at conception or at some other point prior to live birth." , the basis for abortion is a birth requirement for equal protection by us 14th amendment , along with limits of state interest to protection of negative liberties for those entitled to equal protection by us 9th amendment , and in not violating us 1st amendment establishment clause by sanctimonious zealots lacking an understanding that state interests are limited to whether a wright to life exists and not whether a life exists .

The basis for abortion is not dependent upon a belief in populism that democracy should be tyranny by majority at the federal or state level , rather than in individualism .

Sure can, but I don’t let self absorbed assholes tell me what todo. Good luck with your facade.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Pathetic Trolls Needing Attention Because They Could Not If They Tried "

* Living Vicariously By Pretending To Matter *

Sure can, but I don’t let self absorbed assholes tell me what todo. Good luck with your facade.

Sounds to me as though you are a self absorbed asshole telling yourself to be a self absorbed asshole and are obeying .

My retorts stick with the issue and these treatises are long standing , whereas you have proven yourself too ignorant to competently respond to the merits of the thread .

Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments

" Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments " * Express Agreement Or Disagreement With These Premises * Does any agree or disagree that " equal wrights " advocates must make a distinction between negative and positive wrights ? Does...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[BackAgain]

What person has their citizenship threatened?

Not a one.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Traitorous Trolls Fail To Contend With Constitutional Rigor "

* Cut And Dry *

Not a one

You remain unable to address and contend with the simple facts that birth is required for equal protection with a citizen and that state interests are limited to protecting negative liberties between one or more individuals with equal protection and that a state is only concerned with whether a wright to life exists and not whether a life exists .

The basis for each of those constitutional elements begins with the requirement of birth for citizenship , and therefore by equal protection from citizenship , or from the equal protection of citizenship , against which scotus has committed sedition that traitors to us constitution banter and quash to deprive us public of its informed consent .

 

[BackAgain]

" Traitorous Trolls Fail To Contend With Constitutional Rigor "

* Cut And Dry *

You remain unable to address and contend with the simple facts that birth is required for equal protection with a citizen and that state interests are limited to protecting negative liberties between one or more individuals with equal protection and that a state is only concerned with whether a wright to life exists and not whether a life exists .

The basis for each of those constitutional elements begins with the requirement of birth for citizenship , and therefore by equal protection from citizenship , or from the equal protection of citizenship , against which scotus has committed sedition that traitors to us constitution banter and quash to deprive us public of its informed consent .

You refuse to recognize that the right to life doesn’t say it begins at birth. Life begins when life begins. That’s conception.

The rest of your material is stale old blather.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Egocentric Myopia Anthropocentrism Mental Disorder Violators Of Establishment Clause "

* Traitors Support Of SCOTUS Sedition Through Willful Ignorance *

You refuse to recognize that the right to life doesn’t say it begins at birth. Life begins when life begins. That’s conception.

The rest of your material is stale old blather.

You refuse to recognize that a state is not concerned with when life begins , or even whether life exists at all , as in the context of capital punishment , rather a state is only concerned with whether a wright to life exists , and a fetus has not acquired a wright to life by virtue of not having met a birth requirement to receive one by equal protection .

 

[BackAgain]

" Egocentric Myopia Anthropocentrism Mental Disorder Violators Of Establishment Clause "

* Traitors Support Of SCOTUS Sedition Through Willful Ignorance *

You refuse to recognize that a state is not concerned with when life begins , or even whether life exists at all , as in the context of capital punishment , rather a state is only concerned with whether a wright to life exists , and a fetus has not acquired a wright to life by virtue of not having met a birth requirement to receive one by equal protection .

It’s “right.” And the state is certainly “concerned” with the question since it informs to whom the protection is owed.

You’re the one seeking to superimpose a “birth” criteria. But a life is created (a completely and genetically unique life) at conception.

Birth is an artificial line of demarcation. There are many other such lines in the developmental stages of every human being. First heartbeat. First displays of sentience. First displays of nerve conduction. First ability to breathe air. First ability to cry. First ability to make use of any words. First smile. First teeth. Or maybe down the road, it’s puberty and development of classic secondary sex characteristics. Maybe it’s a loss of baby teeth. Who the fuck are you to tell the rest of humanity that your arbitrary line of demarcation is “the” one. The “right” one.

Life is life. Human life is human life. It is absolutely a proper place of the “state” to protect human life. The right to human life.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Last Word Trolls Promoting Traitors To A Republic For Individualism Without Anything Else Relevant To Offer "

* Took A Left Turn To Get Home And Said It Was Right And Believes Stupid Language Is Justified By Populism *

It’s “right.” And the state is certainly “concerned” with the question since it informs to whom the protection is owed.

You’re the one seeking to superimpose a “birth” criteria. But a life is created (a completely and genetically unique life) at conception.

Birth is an artificial line of demarcation. There are many other such lines in the developmental stages of every human being. First heartbeat. First displays of sentience. First displays of nerve conduction. First ability to breathe air. First ability to cry. First ability to make use of any words. First smile. First teeth. Or maybe down the road, it’s puberty and development of classic secondary sex characteristics. Maybe it’s a loss of baby teeth. Who the fuck are you to tell the rest of humanity that your arbitrary line of demarcation is “the” one. The “right” one.

Life is life. Human life is human life. It is absolutely a proper place of the “state” to protect human life. The right to human life.

The term wright is correct and it always will be .

The live birth requirement is written in the constitution and a claim that it is an artificial demarcation is another indication of traitorous deceit .

Us 10th amendment state interests are limited by non enumerated wrights of us 9th amendment to preclude that state interests are not interjected into private issues whimsically and without just cause .

Us 10th amendment state interests of this republic are limited to protecting the negative liberties ( to be left alone by others and the state - independence , individualism ) between those entitled to equal protection .

A fetus has not met the birth requirement for equal protection and is not entitled to equal protection or a wright to life that would be included .

Roe V Wade substituted natural viability - the ability to survive outside unaided - in lieu of live birth which was the wisest available option , however the sanctimonious traitorous sycophants aspiring to violate us 1st , 9th and 14th amendments optioned for sedition .

A state is comprised of citizens in who state interests lay , and as birth is a requirement to become a citizen and instantiation of protected wrights of a citizen , by induction , by logically of course deduction , birth is therefore required for equal protection that would include a wright to life .

The sanctimonious establishment clause traitors point to the mythical third trimester abortion to outlaw all abortions , even though Roe v Wade ruled that states could proscribe abortion in 3rd trimester - post natural viability .

Simple facts are that the chance for an after life , a chance for eternal life , reincarnation , being born again , the life to come are all metaphors for passing on ones genetic identity so that another , both figuratively and literally as oneself , may have an opportunity to experience the sentience , sapience and introspection afforded as life , where failure to do so - in perpetuity till the end of time - is ascribed the metaphors of final judgement and eternal damnation .

A state is not to dictate that a rapist is entitled to an afterlife , or to tell individuals in second trimester who find themselves confronted by ultrasound with fetal abnormalities that diminish their quality of life and do not support passing on their genetic identity , " faux pas - tough shit " , when they can try again in another 30 days , or possibly if they continue with the pregnancy not at all .

Individuals are accountable for their self ownership that includes genetic perpetuity and not the dictates of sanctimonious psychopathic traitors to this republic promoting tyranny by majority and conservatism of state authoritarianism .

 

[BackAgain]

" Last Word Trolls Promoting Traitors To A Republic For Individualism Without Anything Else Relevant To Offer "

* Took A Left Turn To Get Home And Said It Was Right And Believes Stupid Language Is Justified By Populism *

The term wright is correct and it always will be .

If you’re making wagon wheels, maybe. Otherwise, as you attempt to use it, it’s RONG.

The live birth requirement is written in the constitution

No. It’s not. You dopes keep confusing “birth” and “personhood” with “life.”

and a claim that it is an artificial demarcation is another indication of traitorous deceit .

No. It’s called accuracy. This is what has caused your absolute befuddlement.

Us 10th amendment state interests are limited by non enumerated wrights of us 9th amendment to preclude that state interests are not interjected into private issues whimsically and without just cause .

No part of the Constitution discusses “wrights.” More significantly, you are misinterpreting the goal of the 9th and 10th Amendments.

Us 10th amendment state interests of this republic are limited to protecting the negative liberties ( to be left alone by others and the state - independence , individualism ) between those entitled to equal protection .

It says no such thing. There is no Constitutional concept of “negative liberties.” Your education is sorely lacking.

A fetus has not met the birth requirement for equal protection and is not entitled to equal protection or a wright to life that would be included .

A fetus is a life. End of story. Your analysis is fraudulent and you are muddled in your thinking and simply wrong in your alleged “facts.”

Roe V Wade substituted natural viability - the ability to survive outside unaided - in lieu of live birth which was the wisest available option , however the sanctimonious traitorous sycophants aspiring to violate us 1st , 9th and 14th amendments optioned for sedition .

Once again reflecting your non-comprehension of every term in that paragraph.

A state is comprised of citizens in who state interests lay ,

Uhm. What? Try English.

Monk-Eye said:

and as birth is a requirement to become a citizen and instantiation of protected wrights of a citizen , by induction , by logically of course deduction , birth is therefore required for equal protection that would include a wright to life .

Nope. Repeating your prior errors is just repeating errors. There is still no birth requirement. You’re still talking about “rights” not “wrights” [sic] and the rest of your bleating is still just meaningless.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

The def of a human being is a male or female. At fertilization, it is neither. IE Its literally not a human being at conception. That is just your emotion coming out.
Remember, you said this, "facts don't care about your strong emotions."

I mean with the current wokesters in charge of academia I don’t know if they patched the definition into nonsense yet…

But no, the definition of a human being is a living member of the species Homo sapiens.

Which, they are. And you’re wrong that they don’t have a biological sex yet - they do. Depends on which half of the father’s sperm won out. But they have a sex.

So, here is the correct nomenclature after fertilization. Are you ready?

“A human being in the zygote stage of life.”

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

First of all, OP seems to have the writing equivalent of a speech empediment or a verbal tic. It’s very jarring and makes reading and understanding what they mean difficult.

And bizarre insistence on spelling rights as “wrights.”

Second of all, overturning one previous SCOTUS ruling - whether you agree with it or not- is not “sedition.”

Third of all, citing Harry Blackmun’s Roe decision as though it was coherent or logical is a profound error. Roe was always incoherent nonsense.

The 9th Amendment does not give SCOTUS power to make up whatever “rights” it wants. Anything reliant on such a notion should be overturned whether I agree with it as a policy matter or not.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Defending The Republic From Enemies Both Foreign And Domestic "

* Sophistry License *

First of all, OP seems to have the writing equivalent of a speech empediment or a verbal tic. It’s very jarring and makes reading and understanding what they mean difficult.

The options of applied language are chosen purposefully .

* Democracy Of Populism As Tyranny By Majority For Authoritarian Dictates *

And bizarre insistence on spelling rights as “wrights.”

Law wrights write laws best described as wrights , and not as rites or as rights , and the term wright is chosen as a purposeful offense and as an out of hand dispatch to dismiss a necessary correlation between laws and morality - see legal positivism .

* State Dictates Over Stepping Clear Boundaries *

Second of all, overturning one previous SCOTUS ruling - whether you agree with it or not- is not “sedition.”

In this case SCOTUS ruling is sedition , as to reverse Roe V Wade required returning a judgement that abortion could not be outlawed at all and that a 2/3 constitutional amendment was required , perhaps codifying Roe v Wade at the federal level , as that is / was the only other option available to scotus then and now .

Because a fetus had not been born , a state does not have an interest in disparaging the negative liberties of an individual entitled to equal protection when the negative liberties of any other individual entitled to equal protections were not being disparaged .

* Matter Of Fact *

Third of all, citing Harry Blackmun’s Roe decision as though it was coherent or logical is a profound error. Roe was always incoherent nonsense.

The " Logically , of course , a legitimate state interest ... not .. prior to live birth " is blatantly obvious to anyone with half a wit to consider it , in that it was obvious prelude to substituting viability in lieu of a live birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen .

To witness sedition by scotus and its support by traitors to the constitution of this republic , along with the incompetence and insolence of legal communities , of pro-choice administrators , of anti-choice administrators and of the fee press is reprehensible .

* Defender Of Wrights Not Authors *

The 9th Amendment does not give SCOTUS power to make up whatever “rights” it wants. Anything reliant on such a notion should be overturned whether I agree with it as a policy matter or not.

The scotus is there to assure the 9th amendment limits state interests to protection of negative liberties , which represents individualism and independence , whether those negative liberties are enumerated or not , so long as the negative liberties do not disparage those of other individuals entitled to equal protection .

The scotus betrayed its purpose and has committed sedition , just as any other potentate or despot which would suspended us constitution , by directing states to issue force against implementation of us laws - 1st , 9th and 14th amendments .

* Clown Shoes Head Games And Institutional Challenges *

Rest assured that i make numerous phone calls every day of the week and those attending to these treatises well understand them and are grateful .

So there is not a need for playground games of mock the fool because populism is determined by more valid perspectives ; do not expect kindness to be rendered to traitors and a scotus of sedition .

 

[BackAgain]

" Defending The Republic From Enemies Both Foreign And Domestic "

* Sophistry License *

The options of applied language are chosen purposefully .

* Democracy Of Populism As Tyranny By Majority For Authoritarian Dictates *

Law wrights write laws best described as wrights , and not as rites or as rights , and the term wright is chosen as a purposeful offense and as an out of hand dispatch to dismiss a necessary correlation between laws and morality - see legal positivism .

* State Dictates Over Stepping Clear Boundaries *

In this case SCOTUS ruling is sedition as to reverse Roe V Wade required returning a judgement that abortion could not be outlawed at all and that a 2/3 constitutional amendment was required , perhaps codifying Roe v Wade at the federal level , because a fetus had not been born and a state does not have an interest in disparaging the negative liberties of an individual entitled to equal protection when the negative liberties of any other individual entitled to equal protections were not being disparaged .

* Matter Of Fact *

The " Logically , of course , a legitimate state interest ... not .. prior to live birth " is blatantly obvious to anyone with half a wit to consider it , in that it was obvious prelude to substituting viability in lieu of a live birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen .

To witness sedition by scotus and its support by traitors to the constitution of this republic , along with the incompetence and insolence of legal communities , of pro-choice administrators , of anti-choice administrators and of the fee press is reprehensible .

* Defender Of Wrights Not Authors *

The scotus is there to assure the 9th amendment limits state interests to protection of negative liberties , which represents individualism and independence , whether those negative liberties are enumerated or not , so long as the negative liberties do not disparage those of other individuals entitled to equal protection .

The scotus betrayed its purpose and has committed sedition , just as any other potentate or despot that suspended us constitution , by directing states to issue force against implementation of us laws - 1st , 9th and 14th amendments .

* Clown Shoes Head Games And Institutional Challenges *

Rest assured that i make numerous phone calls every day of the week and and those attending to these treatises well understand them and are grateful .

So there is not a need for playground games of mock the fool because populism is determined by more valid perspectives ; do not expect kindness to be rendered to traitors and a scotus of sedition .

Astounding ignorance.

A right is a right. A Wright is someone who crafts things. To write laws does not make one an espouser of rights. You don’t write well; But if you were a playwright, you wouldn’t be creating any rights.

Sedition is a word with meaning except when you use it.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Success Criteria Of Nature For Fitness To Survive "

* Terminology Of Antiquity *

I mean with the current wokesters in charge of academia I don’t know if they patched the definition into nonsense yet…

But no, the definition of a human being is a living member of the species Homo sapiens.

Which, they are. And you’re wrong that they don’t have a biological sex yet - they do. Depends on which half of the father’s sperm won out. But they have a sex.

So, here is the correct nomenclature after fertilization. Are you ready?

“A human being in the zygote stage of life.”

The liberal versus conservative paradigm is intellectual buffoonery to start , but those claiming to be conservatives reference the declaration of independence , wherein " all men are created equal " which surreptitiously presumes that women are not equal - see us 19th amendment .

The etymology of " per son " is therefore male ( son ) and countable by census ( per ) which also implies that since any " per son " born or naturalize by us 14th amendment disqualifies females as citizens by letter of the law .

The credo of this republic is e pluribus unum that also alludes to protection of the individual and individualism , such that to correct the diction in the declaration of independence and us 14th amendment would replace " per son " with individuals .

While contending with traitors of this republic , my politicians are being bantered well before 2002 that " per son " meant male and countable by census .

A " per son " was clarified in title 1 section 8 of us code as any individual born alive at any stage of development and scotus deceitfully and blatantly ignored that letter of law in us 14th amendment as well .

Defining a " per son " as any born alive is simply a reiteration of the birth requirement for citizenship from us 14th amendment and the induction and logically of course deduction that birth is required for equal protection .


* A Degree Of Zoological Classifiation *

The descriptor of hue mammon more correct than human ( sic ) which i do not use .

The classification of arrogance to which the sanctimonious hue mammon ape lauds about itself is that of homo sapiens sapiens , while the qualification for being included in the category is set woefully low .


* Indeterminate Roles Of Sexual Proclivity *

Nonsyndromic 46,XX Testicular Disorders/Differences of Sex Development - GeneReviews® - NCBI Bookshelf

Nonsyndromic 46,XX testicular disorders/differences of sex development (DSD) are characterized by: the presence of a 46,XX karyotype; external genitalia ranging from typical male to ambiguous; two testicles; azoospermia; absence of müllerian structures; and absence of other syndromic features, such as congenital anomalies outside of the genitourinary system, learning disorders / cognitive impairment, or behavioral issues. Approximately 85% of individuals with nonsyndromic 46,XX testicular DSD present after puberty with normal pubic hair and normal penile size but small testes, gynecomastia, and sterility resulting from azoospermia. Approximately 15% of individuals with nonsyndromic 46,XX testicular DSD present at birth with ambiguous genitalia. Gender role and gender identity are reported as male. If untreated, males with 46,XX testicular DSD experience the consequences of testosterone deficiency.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Law Wrights Write Wrights And Pretend Rites Are Rights "

* Bastardized Language *

Astounding ignorance.

A right is a right. A Wright is someone who crafts things. To write laws does not make one an espouser of rights. You don’t write well; But if you were a playwright, you wouldn’t be creating any rights.

Sedition is a word with meaning except when you use it.

A right angle is an allusion to a 90 degree orientation with the horizon , as in to right a ship , or in the case of the hue mammon ape claim to fame that it stood upright from the horizon , which could easily as well have been left depending upon the direction of reference .

The terms left and right are antonyms ; right and wrong are not antonyms ; a wrong is a degree of offense .

There will not be abdication on my part to apply the term right through errant use of slang and cede to its pretentious tripe as representing a necessary correlation between law and morality .

Right angle - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The meaning of right in right angle possibly refers to the Latin adjective rectus 'erect, straight, upright, perpendicular'. A Greek equivalent is orthos 'straight; perpendicular' (see orthogonality).

Orthogonality - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In mathematics, orthogonality is the generalization of the notion of perpendicularity to the linear algebra of bilinear forms.

 

[BackAgain]

" Law Wrights Write Wrights And Pretend Rites Are Rights "

* Bastardized Language *

A right angle is an allusion to a 90 degree orientation with the horizon , as in to right a ship , or in the case of the hue mammon ape claim to fame that it stood upright from the horizon , which could easily as well have been left depending upon the direction of reference .

The terms left and right are antonyms ; right and wrong are not antonyms ; a wrong is a degree of offense .

There will not be abdication on my part to apply the term right through errant use of slang and cede to its pretentious tripe as representing a necessary correlation between law and morality .

Right angle - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The meaning of right in right angle possibly refers to the Latin adjective rectus 'erect, straight, upright, perpendicular'. A Greek equivalent is orthos 'straight; perpendicular' (see orthogonality).

Orthogonality - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In mathematics, orthogonality is the generalization of the notion of perpendicularity to the linear algebra of bilinear forms.

Simple advice: don’t forget to take your meds only as prescribed by a qualified licensed physician.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Sedition Supporters "

* Arrogance Of Despots *

Simple advice: don’t forget to take your meds only as prescribed by a qualified licensed physician.

I do not need advice from traitors to this republic and its constitution .

 

[BackAgain]

" Sedition Supporters "

* Arrogance Of Despots *

I do not need advice from traitors to this republic and its constitution .

You don’t even know what those words mean. What you need is electroshock therapy. You are not able to grasp any of this because you are entirely deluded.

You’re just an ignoramus.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Intellectual Capacity Of Rubber And Glue Clowns *

* I Know You Are But What Am I *

You don’t even know what those words mean. What you need is electroshock therapy. You are not able to grasp any of this because you are entirely deluded.

You’re just an ignoramus.

Everything stated by myself here in this thread is factual , many understand it and many will continue to adopt it .