BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Most of what you wrote here is completely silly gibberish and you clearly don’t understand the subject matter.
But by all means, muddle on.
Equal Protection Of Citizenship Is In A State Of Sedition Because Of Supreme Court Ruling On Abortion
- Thread starter Monk-Eye
- Start date
But by all means, muddle on.
Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 4,601
- 1,133
- 140
- Thread starter
- #82
" Ass Hats For All Traitorous Supporters Of scotus Sedition "
* Dullard Mentality Of Traitors Backed Up By Bullshit And Fluff *
Such a statement is on par with the lack of intellect exemplified by the degenerate traitor all eat toe whom is supposedly educated but is now obviously a disgraceful reprobate .
How about doing us all a favor and catch up - Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments ?
* Pro-Choice Republican Spitting Deservedly At Villains *
The scotus has committed sedition that is well established and traitors to us constitution which support its decision are likewise corroborators in its crime .
* Dullard Mentality Of Traitors Backed Up By Bullshit And Fluff *
And yet you stated that negative liberties do not have a relationship with us constitution , while such a statement to any educated in political science would relegate your opinion to the level of a neophyte and an imbecile .Most of what you wrote here is completely silly gibberish and you clearly don’t understand the subject matter.
But by all means, muddle on.
Such a statement is on par with the lack of intellect exemplified by the degenerate traitor all eat toe whom is supposedly educated but is now obviously a disgraceful reprobate .
How about doing us all a favor and catch up - Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments ?
* Pro-Choice Republican Spitting Deservedly At Villains *
The scotus has committed sedition that is well established and traitors to us constitution which support its decision are likewise corroborators in its crime .
That was not a requirement.
Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist issued his ruling when Roe V Wade was first ruled and he was against the ruling. Justice White also was against the law and the law had a fatal flaw as it's only claim was due to privacy. As I see this, criminals also have rights they claim are violated.
When a woman conceives, she caused life to start. Life has no value she says when she wants abortion. If this is so, her life also has no value.
Last edited:
Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 4,601
- 1,133
- 140
- Thread starter
- #84
" Evidence From Actual Free Speech Platforms Versus Censure By Fee Press And Academia "
* Logically Of Course Does Not Need To Be Explained To Anyone *
The roe v wade opinion stated that the term " person " was not clearly defined and in 2002 the term person was defined in title 1 section 8 of us code , and the term person was made consistent with equitable doctrine whereby a live birth is required for equal protection with a us citizen .
An etymology of the term person is per son , which means countable by census and male , albeit a person was defined as any homo sapiens sapiens born alive at any stage of development , with the meaning of alive being clarified further .
. Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade .
* Logically Of Course Does Not Need To Be Explained To Anyone *
A rite to privacy is not the basis of roe v wade and making such a claim promotes a ridiculous public narrative , which has been ignorantly and incompetently perpetrated in opposition for informed consent of us public , by the fee press , by jurisprudence and by political pundits .
The roe v wade opinion stated that the term " person " was not clearly defined and in 2002 the term person was defined in title 1 section 8 of us code , and the term person was made consistent with equitable doctrine whereby a live birth is required for equal protection with a us citizen .
An etymology of the term person is per son , which means countable by census and male , albeit a person was defined as any homo sapiens sapiens born alive at any stage of development , with the meaning of alive being clarified further .
. Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade .
Justices of the Supreme court says it was.
I believe you are telling us what Democrat Justices claimed. Abortion is defined.
It was so flawed it was later more recently ruled wrong.
Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 4,601
- 1,133
- 140
- Thread starter
- #87
" Two Sides Of An Idiot Coin "
* Constitutional Rigor Not Evident To Partisan Hacks *
Us 9th amendment stipulates that not all rites retained by the people are enumerated and only a degenerate would ignore it .
No us state has the power to abrogate us federal constitutional amendments , which means us states do not have the power to abrogate us 14th amendment , which means us sates to not have the power to abrogate a live birth requirement to become a us citizen or to abrogate a live birth requirement for equal protection with a us citizen , which means that states are prohibited from providing constitutional protections to any thing which has not met a live birth requirement to receive them , which means that states are prohibited from proscribing abortion as a fetus has not met a live birth requirement to receive constitutional protections .
The demon rats does not revere us citizenship and are willing to hand it out indiscriminately in violation of thereof term in us 14th amendment , while republic pugnacious cans revile a live birth requirement to become a us citizen and for equal protection in violation us 14th amendment .
. Zone1 - Civis Etas Unis Sum And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof Clause From Us 14th Amendment .
. Notice For Public Record : Foundational Nuances Of Us 9th Versus Us 10th Amendments For Individuals States And Federal Interests .
* Constitutional Rigor Not Evident To Partisan Hacks *
The rite to privacy premise is stupidity and it is a ruse to deceive the us public of the actual basis for roe v wade , which is a live birth requirement to receive equal protection with a citizen , as legitimate state interests begin with instantiation of a citizen .
Us 9th amendment stipulates that not all rites retained by the people are enumerated and only a degenerate would ignore it .
No us state has the power to abrogate us federal constitutional amendments , which means us states do not have the power to abrogate us 14th amendment , which means us sates to not have the power to abrogate a live birth requirement to become a us citizen or to abrogate a live birth requirement for equal protection with a us citizen , which means that states are prohibited from providing constitutional protections to any thing which has not met a live birth requirement to receive them , which means that states are prohibited from proscribing abortion as a fetus has not met a live birth requirement to receive constitutional protections .
The demon rats does not revere us citizenship and are willing to hand it out indiscriminately in violation of thereof term in us 14th amendment , while republic pugnacious cans revile a live birth requirement to become a us citizen and for equal protection in violation us 14th amendment .
. Zone1 - Civis Etas Unis Sum And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof Clause From Us 14th Amendment .
. Notice For Public Record : Foundational Nuances Of Us 9th Versus Us 10th Amendments For Individuals States And Federal Interests .
Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 4,601
- 1,133
- 140
- Thread starter
- #88
" Abortion Choice Arrogance And Incompetence For Public Narrative Representated Before Judicial Review "
* Abortion Choice Leadership Funded Center For Reproductive Freedom Legal Incompetence *
The dobbs court was not presented with the actual constitutional basis of roe v wade and it is obvious from the dumbfounded opinion of alito , which ignored a " logically , of course , a legitimate state interest . . not . . prior to live birth " statement of blackmun , whom wrote the majority opinion of roe v wade .
. https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf .
" Although the Court acknowledged that States had a legitimate interest in protecting “potential life,” it found that this
interest could not justify any restriction on pre-viability abortions.
* Logically Of Course Ignored Through Judicial Activism By Constitutional Hacks With Shit For Brains *
. Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade .
* Abortion Choice Leadership Funded Center For Reproductive Freedom Legal Incompetence *
The abortion choice leadership that continued to commandeer contributions and promoted a public narrative and legal representation , that a rite to privacy was the constitutional basis for roe v wade and for abortion , arrogantly refused to take advice .
The dobbs court was not presented with the actual constitutional basis of roe v wade and it is obvious from the dumbfounded opinion of alito , which ignored a " logically , of course , a legitimate state interest . . not . . prior to live birth " statement of blackmun , whom wrote the majority opinion of roe v wade .
. https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf .
" Although the Court acknowledged that States had a legitimate interest in protecting “potential life,” it found that this
interest could not justify any restriction on pre-viability abortions.
* Logically Of Course Ignored Through Judicial Activism By Constitutional Hacks With Shit For Brains *
. Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade .
There is no right to privacy for criminals to commit crimes. At the time of Roe v Wade, abortion was illegal. Doctors were put in prison. They as professionals understood they murdered tiny humans. Roe v Wade is the only time this right of privacy to commit crimes was even mentioned.
You do not know history of abortion.
Why was it not included in the Constitution? It still is not in the constitution. From our founding, doctors caught doing abortions were prosecuted. We have long had a supreme court yet the supreme court never approved abortion until Roe v Wade. Recently the supreme courts reversed due to earlier faulty fatal ruling.
Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 4,601
- 1,133
- 140
- Thread starter
- #91
" States Cannot Abrogate Equal Protection Clause And Live Birth Contingency "
* Obvious Simple Ton Thoughts *
The basis of roe v wade was and always will be based on reverence for , or revulsion against , a non incidental requirement of live birth for us citizenship and for equal protection , and reverence for or revulsion against independence of the individual , as a basis of us republic , whether an individual is a citizen , a corporate , a state , a federate or a civil litigant .
A law exists because there is an entity capable of an issuing a retort for a violation against some legal construct .
* Obvious Simple Ton Thoughts *
A rite to privacy exists through us 4th and 5th amendments , however those protections do not safeguard an individual from discretion for behavior in public , such as soliciting public facilities providing services against a legislated or judicial ordinance of posited law .
The basis of roe v wade was and always will be based on reverence for , or revulsion against , a non incidental requirement of live birth for us citizenship and for equal protection , and reverence for or revulsion against independence of the individual , as a basis of us republic , whether an individual is a citizen , a corporate , a state , a federate or a civil litigant .
A law exists because there is an entity capable of an issuing a retort for a violation against some legal construct .
4th limited to searches
5th limited to self incrimination
Again, doctors were prosecuted for years and years.
If you are correct, it would have been decided more than likely by 1800. Were it correct, the latest ruling could not have happened. It is gone. Vanished.
Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 4,601
- 1,133
- 140
- Thread starter
- #94
" Us 9th Amendment Ignored With A Passion By Traitorous Political Hacks "
* Mob Rules Speculators Versus Normative Values For Independence Of The Individual *
The scotus response to tx s.b. 8 fatwa ( fat wad ) contradicts its dobbs decision by including a state as a plaintiff that could maintain a cause of action .
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21A85/196650/20211018120230336_US v. Texas application final.pdf
The United States has a sovereign interest in ensuring the supremacy of federal law by preventing a State from suspending a constitutional right within its borders.
Indeed, S.B. 8’s entire structure for its private enforcement suits manifests overt hostility to a defense based on this Court’s decisions recognizing a constitutional right to abortion. See pp.5-7, supra.
a. S.B. 8 is a statute enacted by the Texas legislature,signed by the Texas governor, and enforceable in Texas courts. If Texas had not enacted S.B. 8, no private plaintiff could maintainthe cause of action that it creates. And no plaintiff could maintain an S.B. 8 cause of action or recover the statutory damages it authorizes without action by the Texas courts. It is, in short, plain that Texas is responsible for the constitutional violations caused by S.B. 8. It should be equally plain that where, as here,the State’s sovereign immunity does not apply, Texas can be enjoined to prevent those violations.
* E Pluribus Unum Schema *
By principles of non violence , violence is illegitimate aggression , while self defense against violence is legitimate aggression .
By principles of individualism , violence is aggression that illegitimately deprives an individual of self ownership , or self determination , where self ownership entitles an individual to free roam , to free association and to progeny , and where self determination entitles an individual to own private property and , by willful intents , to enter into social civil agreements by contracts made valid through informed consent .
Negative liberties represent protections , independence and individualism .
Positive liberties represent endowments , dependence and collectivism .
The us republicanism and us republic espouses independence of the individual and equal protection of negative liberties among individuals , whether an individual is a citizen , a corporate , a state , a federate or a civil litigant .
In us republic , the legitimate interests of a us state , or us federate , are on behalf or its individual citizens , where citizens are instantiated through a live birth requirement , and equal protection of negative liberties among individuals is delimited by safety or security .
A state is prohibited from providing constitutional protections to a fetus , which is equivalent to a state being prohibited from outlawing abortion .
In abortion , as a fetus has not satisfied a live birth requirement and is private property of the mother and an element of self ownership from principles of individualism .
Any number of things have occurred throughout history , especially by those espousing populism for democracy as tyranny by the collective majority that is against independence of the individual .
* Mob Rules Speculators Versus Normative Values For Independence Of The Individual *
How about brush up on 9th amendment history and report back with your opinion for whether it should have been included at all ?
The scotus response to tx s.b. 8 fatwa ( fat wad ) contradicts its dobbs decision by including a state as a plaintiff that could maintain a cause of action .
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21A85/196650/20211018120230336_US v. Texas application final.pdf
The United States has a sovereign interest in ensuring the supremacy of federal law by preventing a State from suspending a constitutional right within its borders.
Indeed, S.B. 8’s entire structure for its private enforcement suits manifests overt hostility to a defense based on this Court’s decisions recognizing a constitutional right to abortion. See pp.5-7, supra.
a. S.B. 8 is a statute enacted by the Texas legislature,signed by the Texas governor, and enforceable in Texas courts. If Texas had not enacted S.B. 8, no private plaintiff could maintainthe cause of action that it creates. And no plaintiff could maintain an S.B. 8 cause of action or recover the statutory damages it authorizes without action by the Texas courts. It is, in short, plain that Texas is responsible for the constitutional violations caused by S.B. 8. It should be equally plain that where, as here,the State’s sovereign immunity does not apply, Texas can be enjoined to prevent those violations.
* E Pluribus Unum Schema *
By principles of non violence , violence is illegitimate aggression , while self defense against violence is legitimate aggression .
By principles of individualism , violence is aggression that illegitimately deprives an individual of self ownership , or self determination , where self ownership entitles an individual to free roam , to free association and to progeny , and where self determination entitles an individual to own private property and , by willful intents , to enter into social civil agreements by contracts made valid through informed consent .
Negative liberties represent protections , independence and individualism .
Positive liberties represent endowments , dependence and collectivism .
The us republicanism and us republic espouses independence of the individual and equal protection of negative liberties among individuals , whether an individual is a citizen , a corporate , a state , a federate or a civil litigant .
In us republic , the legitimate interests of a us state , or us federate , are on behalf or its individual citizens , where citizens are instantiated through a live birth requirement , and equal protection of negative liberties among individuals is delimited by safety or security .
A state is prohibited from providing constitutional protections to a fetus , which is equivalent to a state being prohibited from outlawing abortion .
In abortion , as a fetus has not satisfied a live birth requirement and is private property of the mother and an element of self ownership from principles of individualism .
Any number of things have occurred throughout history , especially by those espousing populism for democracy as tyranny by the collective majority that is against independence of the individual .
Last edited:
Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 4,601
- 1,133
- 140
- Thread starter
- #95
" Loves Logical Fallacies Especially Appeal To Authority And Bandwagon "
* Too Many Minds Following Easily Dispatched Nonsense Standards *
The roe v wade decision was set aside through dumbfounded conclusions , formal sedition and malfeasance of dobbs scotus , and its justices weighing in the affirmative for dobbs should be charged as should any despot suspending us constitution .
* Too Many Minds Following Easily Dispatched Nonsense Standards *
Any us citizen has legal standing against us state proscription of abortion , as such laws violate the equal protection clause of us 14th amendment , and it is a matter of time until justification for its precedence is realized .
The roe v wade decision was set aside through dumbfounded conclusions , formal sedition and malfeasance of dobbs scotus , and its justices weighing in the affirmative for dobbs should be charged as should any despot suspending us constitution .
It is part of the founding constitution.
Again and again you must be told that doctors were for a long time prosecuted for their role in abortions. Roe v wade invented new law. The SC can't do that.
Justice Rehnquist and justice White got it right. More currently Justice Roberts and his court got it right. In fact Abortion laws commenced in 1821 and lasted until 1973, a period of time of 152 years.
So you now understand???
Last edited:
Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 4,601
- 1,133
- 140
- Thread starter
- #97
" Foolishness Of Not Ignoring The Crowds "
* Logical Fallacy Of Because It Has Always Been Done That Way *
How about humor us and explain the " logically , of course , a legitimate state interest . . not . . prior to live birth " statement by blackmun , whom wrote the majority opinion for roe v wade , as rehnquist and the blathering fools that followed a rite to privacy premise did not ?
* Logical Fallacy Of Because It Has Always Been Done That Way *
Yeah , rehnquist sounds like the rest of the imbeciles that followed , rambling on about a rite to privacy and due process .
How about humor us and explain the " logically , of course , a legitimate state interest . . not . . prior to live birth " statement by blackmun , whom wrote the majority opinion for roe v wade , as rehnquist and the blathering fools that followed a rite to privacy premise did not ?
Blackmun was wrong. Roberts court ruled it was wrong.
Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 4,601
- 1,133
- 140
- Thread starter
- #99
" Traitors Against Us Republic Promoting Sedition "
* Disingenuous Cowards *
The dobbs ruling is dumbfounded and sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments , that with malevolent malfeasance dismissed the definition of a person in title 1 section 8 of us code as any born alive at any point in development .
* Disingenuous Cowards *
That is not an explanation for " logically , of course , a legitimate state interest . . not . . prior to live birth " .
The dobbs ruling is dumbfounded and sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments , that with malevolent malfeasance dismissed the definition of a person in title 1 section 8 of us code as any born alive at any point in development .
Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 145,829
- 32,769
- 2,180
This coming from YOU?
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
Are We On the Verge of a Breakthrough on the SAVE America Act?
- Started by Doc7505
- Replies: 1
-
Bessent makes excuses for trump, saying he was glad Mueller is dead- Started by JimH52
- Replies: 26
-
Whoops: Schumer Slips on ICE - Makes Hilarious Mistake While Railing About It
- Started by Doc7505
- Replies: 5
