Enough with Posting what Others have Written!

[Dot Com]

He must be complaining about Poliochic

He complained about my post linking an article of a couple thousand words about Jindal's econ performance. By a former Times Picayunne reporter ... with quotes from republican officials ... and numbers about dollars.

Some people live to complain........Hell of a way to live....

Sad, sad, SAD!!!

 

[Moonglow]

He must be complaining about Poliochic

He complained about my post linking an article of a couple thousand words about Jindal's econ performance. By a former Times Picayunne reporter ... with quotes from republican officials ... and numbers about dollars.

Some people live to complain........Hell of a way to live....

Sad, sad, SAD!!!

 

[Skylar]

If you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.

Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?

Why would you kick PoliticalChic right in the balls like this?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

If you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.

Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?

Why would you kick PoliticalChic right in the balls like this?

I nailed her racist ass to the wall in the Terri Schiavo thread. She's a troll and a bigot. Not one of us.

 

[boilermaker55]

The vast majority wouldn't know what to post. Linking it to information is something still needed.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

The vast majority wouldn't know what to post. Linking it to information is something still needed.

Isn't that a predicament? Anyone too stupid to post original content would also be too stupid to evaluate their sources intelligently.

 

[Stephanie]

Maybe all of you here should start your own Message board if you want to make up the rules...

You can ***** all you want

 

[BlueGin]

If you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.

Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?

2-3 paragraphs, to make one's point, with a link then a personal argument for or against it. Its called "sourcing". google it . You don't source, you're not worth my time

It is true that someone who takes an entire article, or anything over the aforementioned length, and copynpaste's it here w/ very-little-to-no personal commentary IS a mouth-breather.

90% of the "sources" your side links are lefty **** opinion pieces with the same intellectual capacity as a broken toaster.

Yep. And they know it. And if you post links making a point they disagree with they refuse to read them.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Maybe all of you here should start your own Message board if you want to make up the rules...

You can ***** all you want

It's just a suggestion. I agree that excessive dependance on posted fodder is a sign of ineptitude.

 

[Dot Com]

Maybe all of you here should start your own Message board if you want to make up the rules...

You can ***** all you want

as opposed to you, lunch lady, who uses blatantly partisan conservative hack sites & blogs lol as your *cough* "sources"

 

[bendog]

Maybe all of you here should start your own Message board if you want to make up the rules...

You can ***** all you want

as opposed to you, lunch lady, who uses blatantly partisan conservative hack sites & blogs lol as your *cough* "sources"

There's that. Sometimes I wade through a lot of chaff to find a link. It's easier when doing academic research and having a database with only academic material.

 

[bendog]

If you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.

Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?

Why would you kick PoliticalChic right in the balls like this?

Yeah, no picking on PC. She's nuts, but the good kind of nuts.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

If you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.

Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?

Why would you kick PoliticalChic right in the balls like this?

Yeah, no picking on PC. She's nuts, but the good kind of nuts.

I disagree.

Bad nut. The squirrel doesn't lie.

 

[Carla_Danger]

If you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.

Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?

Why don't you let PoliticalChic know how you feel. LOL!

 

[NYcarbineer]

If you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.

Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?

Goddam! It's a PoliticalChic call out thread!

Catfight! Catfight! Get your catfight tickets here!

 

[NYcarbineer]

If you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.

Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?

Why don't you let PoliticalChic know how you feel. LOL!

lol I didn't see your post. Awesome. lol

 

[NYcarbineer]

If you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.

Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?

2-3 paragraphs, to make one's point, with a link then a personal argument for or against it. Its called "sourcing". google it . You don't source, you're not worth my time

It is true that someone who takes an entire article, or anything over the aforementioned length, and copynpaste's it here w/ very-little-to-no personal commentary IS a mouth-breather.

90% of the "sources" your side links are lefty **** opinion pieces with the same intellectual capacity as a broken toaster.

90% of those sites are further linked to the original sources.

 

[Cassandro]

Why don't you let PoliticalChic know how you feel. LOL!

At least PC doesn't deal in insipid one-liners.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Why don't you let PoliticalChic know how you feel. LOL!

At least PC doesn't deal in insipid one-liners.

That's because it's all cut n paste. I'd be surprised if she could string an entire sentence.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why don't you let PoliticalChic know how you feel. LOL!

At least PC doesn't deal in insipid one-liners.

She's the queen of the insipid one-liner insult. She goes to websites to find them.