Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Sad, sad, SAD!!!Some people live to complain........Hell of a way to live....He complained about my post linking an article of a couple thousand words about Jindal's econ performance. By a former Times Picayunne reporter ... with quotes from republican officials ... and numbers about dollars.He must be complaining about Poliochic
Sad, sad, SAD!!!Some people live to complain........Hell of a way to live....He complained about my post linking an article of a couple thousand words about Jindal's econ performance. By a former Times Picayunne reporter ... with quotes from republican officials ... and numbers about dollars.He must be complaining about Poliochic
If you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.
Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?
I nailed her racist ass to the wall in the Terri Schiavo thread. She's a troll and a bigot. Not one of us.If you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.
Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?
Why would you kick PoliticalChic right in the balls like this?
Isn't that a predicament? Anyone too stupid to post original content would also be too stupid to evaluate their sources intelligently.The vast majority wouldn't know what to post. Linking it to information is something still needed.
Yep. And they know it. And if you post links making a point they disagree with they refuse to read them.2-3 paragraphs, to make one's point, with a link then a personal argument for or against it. Its called "sourcing". google itIf you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.
Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?. You don't source, you're not worth my time
It is true that someone who takes an entire article, or anything over the aforementioned length, and copynpaste's it here w/ very-little-to-no personal commentary IS a mouth-breather.
90% of the "sources" your side links are lefty twat opinion pieces with the same intellectual capacity as a broken toaster.
It's just a suggestion. I agree that excessive dependance on posted fodder is a sign of ineptitude.Maybe all of you here should start your own Message board if you want to make up the rules...
You can bitch all you want
as opposed to you, lunch lady, who uses blatantly partisan conservative hack sites & blogs lol as your *cough* "sources"Maybe all of you here should start your own Message board if you want to make up the rules...
You can bitch all you want
There's that. Sometimes I wade through a lot of chaff to find a link. It's easier when doing academic research and having a database with only academic material.as opposed to you, lunch lady, who uses blatantly partisan conservative hack sites & blogs lol as your *cough* "sources"Maybe all of you here should start your own Message board if you want to make up the rules...
You can bitch all you want
Yeah, no picking on PC. She's nuts, but the good kind of nuts.If you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.
Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?
Why would you kick PoliticalChic right in the balls like this?
I disagree.Yeah, no picking on PC. She's nuts, but the good kind of nuts.If you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.
Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?
Why would you kick PoliticalChic right in the balls like this?
If you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.
Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?
If you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.
Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?
If you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.
Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?
Why don't you let PoliticalChic know how you feel. LOL!
2-3 paragraphs, to make one's point, with a link then a personal argument for or against it. Its called "sourcing". google itIf you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.
Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?
It is true that someone who takes an entire article, or anything over the aforementioned length, and copynpaste's it here w/ very-little-to-no personal commentary IS a mouth-breather.
90% of the "sources" your side links are lefty twat opinion pieces with the same intellectual capacity as a broken toaster.
Why don't you let PoliticalChic know how you feel. LOL!
Why don't you let PoliticalChic know how you feel. LOL!
At least PC doesn't deal in insipid one-liners.
Why don't you let PoliticalChic know how you feel. LOL!
At least PC doesn't deal in insipid one-liners.
