Zone1 ending DEI (domestically and internationally) : a good thing, or a bad?

ending DEI (domestically and internationally) : a good thing, or a bad?


  • Total voters
    20
The DEI Ideal was KJP. Otherwise known as Little Miss Binder. Checked all three boxes. Female ,Gay ,and Black. Never mind that she was a stupid ,incompetent nincompoop.
 
DuckSpeak. Try again in English.
Which part are you having trouble with?

I try to keep to short sentences and words of less than three syllables (I know, I know, sorry) for you guys.

What else do you need?
 
Mo. You have to decide whether to hire one guy or the other regardless of their color.

So, I'm the one hiring here? OK. Sure. I will hire based on qualifications and how well they interview.



You can't just hire the white man because you think women don't belong in the workplace and you don't like black people.

So, that was nonsense. And rude as hell. IN the real world, I want to hire people with good work histories and who will show up.

Your pretense that this is 950s jim crow south, is dumb.




And if you've hired 37 white guys in a row with no minoritiesd or females in the mix they might take a look at your hiring practices.

That would not be my hiring record. It was not, when I was in management.

So, your scenario is just nonsense.


What actually happened was that upper management realized that the management team was all white and decided that hte next shift supervisor had to be black.

NO white people were considered, regardless of qualifications.

The promotion denied to them, was a big one. It would make the difference from working poor, to lower middle class. That promotion for me, when I got it, made the difference from taking hte bus to see my mom, to taking my mon on a cruise.


And it was a rare chance. This was, if not an once in a lifetime chance, close to it.


Your lack of concern for the people hurt, is you being a bad person.
 
DuckSpeak. Try again in English.


Libs pretend to be dumb, so that they can twist your words and pretend you said something and then pretend to address that, when in reality they are just spamming an attack on you.

It is a very vile tactic.
 
Libs pretend to be dumb, so that they can twist your words and pretend you said something and then pretend to address that, when in reality they are just spamming an attack on you.

It is a very vile tactic.
Wow.

Ok, so you're just another tRumpling hateful moron.

Bye
 
But not their skill sets.,.....no matter what color.

Qualified because of their color or sex......


They seem to think that their words, will make people forget how dei and diversity and ect, has been enacted, and we have been living under it, and harmed by it, for decades,


they think they can just talk some shit and their words are more important than what we all have experienced and seen with our own eyes.
 
Which part are you having trouble with?

I try to keep to short sentences and words of less than three syllables (I know, I know, sorry) for you guys.

What else do you need?
INCEL is not English. Have no idea of meaning. But I am sure it is derogatory.
 
Depends on how you define it. Nothing wrong with diversity at face value. You bring in people with different backgrounds to complement one another.

Equity is just a marxist term for taking things from white people.

Inclusion? WTF does that even mean?
 
Depends on how you define it. Nothing wrong with diversity at face value. You bring in people with different backgrounds to complement one another.

Equity is just a marxist term for taking things from white people.

Inclusion? WTF does that even mean?
Just more Marxist Duckspeak,
 
INCEL is not English. Have no idea of meaning. But I am sure it is derogatory.
Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure you don't!!

Probably never heard of project 2025 or Q anon either, right?

200w.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom