Zone1 ending DEI (domestically and internationally) : a good thing, or a bad?

[Dr.Know]

DEI IS ANOTHER DISTRACTION,,,, Stop discussing these Distractions as they keep these fake distractions alive.

 

[debbiedowner]

Do you know what group is the number one beneficiary of DEI policies?

Let me guess, women?

 

[Crepitus]

Let me guess, women?

Specifically white women have benefited far more than all the other demographics combined.

 

[Correll]

DEI IS ANOTHER DISTRACTION,,,, Stop discussing these Distractions as they keep these fake distractions alive.

DEI is massive and widespread discrimiantion in jobs and promotions and admissions, and who knows what else.


That is real. Not just a distraction. Reversing this poiicy can make a real difference to millions and millions of people.

 

[Correll]

Specifically white women have benefited far more than all the other demographics combined.

Interesting claim. So?

 

[Crepitus]

Interesting claim. So?

It's a fact. I made a whole thread in this including links.

You kids do not know what you are killing.

 

[Correll]

It's a fact. I made a whole thread in this including links.

You kids do not know what you are killing.

I didn't deny it. I asked SO WHAT?

How is that supposed fact relevant to the issue?

 

[Crepitus]

I didn't deny it. I asked SO WHAT?

How is that supposed fact relevant to the issue?

"You kids do not know what you are killing".

Did you not see that in the post you quoted?

 

[Lisa558]

There are more white woman than blacks, so of course in absolute numbers it appears they gain more. But the fact is that blacks, and particularly female blacks, are most likely to gain.from DEI.

Put a white woman and a black woman up for the same job, and the black woman will get it even if she’s less competent.

 

[Tyrion234]

Because it just blows my mind how little you people know about what is happening.

The number one beneficiary of DEI programs both public and private is white women.

And that's not "as I see it" it's a proven fact.

You people have no idea of the consequences of what you're voting for.

Ok broski, so why is it so important to you to keep it if it isn’t doing what it was intended to do?

 

[Rawley]

Because it just blows my mind how little you people know about what is happening.

The number one beneficiary of DEI programs both public and private is white women.

And that's not "as I see it" it's a proven fact.

You people have no idea of the consequences of what you're voting for.

Proven how? Do you have a graph of white women in the workplace in the past two decades that show a marked spike in the last three years since your cult started this DEI scam?

 

[Crepitus]

Ok broski, so why is it so important to you to keep it if it isn’t doing what it was intended to do?

You don't think it was designed to help white women as well as everyone alse?

 

[Correll]

"You kids do not know what you are killing".

Did you not see that in the post you quoted?

My oppostion to the policy is based on it being unfair to the poeple that are denied jobs based on race or other issue.

I am against discriminating against people and this poilcy causes harm to people.


Nothing you have said, explains any connection between your "Fact" and the reasons that people oppose the policy.


Your whole argument seems based on a complete misunderstanding of everything that has been said in this thread.

 

[Crepitus]

My oppostion to the policy is based on it being unfair to the poeple that are denied jobs based on race or other issue.

Denied?

Bullshit. This is about giving jobs to people who deserve them. Nor denying anything.

 

[Correll]

Denied?

Bullshit. This is about giving jobs to people who deserve them. Nor denying anything.

You give a job to some guy that you think "deserves" it, you deny it to person who would have, should have gotten the job.

Your refusal to be honest about this, is becase you know that your position is indefensible.

 

[Crepitus]

You give a job to some guy that you think "deserves" it, you deny it to person who would have, should have gotten the job.

Your refusal to be honest about this, is becase you know that your position is indefensible.

LOL, nope. You can't be honest about this because you know you position is indefensible.

This is about keeping people from being denied a job they are qualified for because of their color or sex.

 

[Correll]

LOL, nope. You can't be honest about this because you know you position is indefensible.

This is about keeping people from being denied a job they are qualified for because of their color or sex.

When you look at a force adn decide that it needs more "diversity" so you choose to hire a black guy,

that is denying all white people from even being considered.

That is the way it is actually done.

Your stonewalling on this, is only fooling teh very inexperienced.

 

[San Souci]

Do you know what group is the number one beneficiary of DEI policies?

Blacks.

 

[Crepitus]

When you look at a force adn decide that it needs more "diversity" so you choose to hire a black guy,

Mo. You have to decide whether to hire one guy or the other regardless of their color. You can't just hire the white man because you think women don't belong in the workplace and you don't like black people.

And if you've hired 37 white guys in a row with no minoritiesd or females in the mix they might take a look at your hiring practices.

 

[Crepitus]

Blacks.

no

You a white woman? If so there's a good chance you are a DEI hire.