Education Dept. : BDS activity against Israel will be defined as anti-Semitism

I do not believe that, because Jews lived anywhere in the world for a long period of time (Jews in Mesopotamia for 2500 years for instance) that anyone in the world is ever going to be considering Iraq, etc as "historically Jewish" regardless of the fact that Jews were living in that part of the ME for as long as they did, which is longer than any Muslim conquest (Arab or otherwise ) might have been.

As I put it, the Americas are not "Historically European" regardless of which European country invaded, conquered, colonized, displaced or ethnically cleansed any and all of those continents for the past 500 years.

As far as I see it, it is exactly the same with the Jewish homeland.

Yes, the Jewish people more readily accept Arabs, Christians or Muslims, living amongst them in Israel in peace or giving up land as they already have, than Muslims (and even Christians) ever have, or will in the future.

The word historical, does have a precise meaning to me.

America may have been "historically" colonized by the British. But if the French had taken over, it would no more make it their historical homeland, than it has for the British, or what eventually became....Americans.

You make a fair and reasonable point. One could argue that there are many places in the world which are "historically Jewish". One might argue that in a thousand years France will be "historically Arab Muslim".

But what does one DO with that?
I have never heard of Spain or Iraq, etc being considered to be historically Jewish.
That so many parts of the world do have Jewish history for centuries or thousands of years Is different from them being historically Jewish. They were not founded by Jews, and no Jewish nation was ever created there for people to remember them as being historically Jewish.
Kaybhar, in Saudi Arabia could e considered still as historically Jewish for how long they were there and the fact that it has been kept empty since there. Another is aJewish kingdom which existed in Arabia until the 11th century until the Muslims conquered it.
 
I’m really enjoying this bullshit discussion.
Obviously Coyote knows dip squat about the reality of Jews in Israel going back to the 60s and onwards when Jews were terrified to walk outside after sundown.
“Too bad” those days are gone and God has overtly smiled upon the Jews despite being hated more by the world than Trump is by Liberals.
The Arabs are schooled from birth to murder in the name of Allah and all the web sites on Earth won’t change that fact.
 
Actually...historically, when it was a regional power, wasn't Judaism a warrior religion? The most peaceful religions seem to be those who have never been a political power anywhere.

No. Judaism is not and was not ever a "warrior religion". There is nothing in Jewish theology that would fall into that category. Which religions would you consider "peaceful" out of curiosity?

Possibly B'ahai, and there are some much smaller sects particularly in India like the Jains.

But I had read that in it's background, Judaism had warriers and allowed for violence within circumscribed rules, I think another poster had talked about it once. There was Joshua, a famous warrier for example. (I'll point out is not so different than Islam, which has a lot of rules concerning warfare) - but much of that is in Jewish ancient history: Judaism and warfare - Wikipedia
 
Actually...historically, when it was a regional power, wasn't Judaism a warrior religion? The most peaceful religions seem to be those who have never been a political power anywhere.

No. Judaism is not and was not ever a "warrior religion". There is nothing in Jewish theology that would fall into that category. Which religions would you consider "peaceful" out of curiosity?

Possibly B'ahai, and there are some much smaller sects particularly in India like the Jains.

But I had read that in it's background, Judaism had warriers and allowed for violence within circumscribed rules, I think another poster had talked about it once. There was Joshua, a famous warrier for example. (I'll point out is not so different than Islam, which has a lot of rules concerning warfare) - but much of that is in Jewish ancient history: Judaism and warfare - Wikipedia
What does ancient Jewish History have to do with today's invaders of Israel wanting to destroy that country and kill or enslave its people? (Ok, just make them their servants again)

Yes, they were warriors, and conquered some people like the Jebusites and Jerusalem. And many other tribes around the area, and it all became the Nation of Israel.

What does that have to do with how Jews have been for the past 2000 years, especially under Christian or Muslim rule?
 
Actually...historically, when it was a regional power, wasn't Judaism a warrior religion? The most peaceful religions seem to be those who have never been a political power anywhere.

No. Judaism is not and was not ever a "warrior religion". There is nothing in Jewish theology that would fall into that category. Which religions would you consider "peaceful" out of curiosity?

Possibly B'ahai, and there are some much smaller sects particularly in India like the Jains.

But I had read that in it's background, Judaism had warriers and allowed for violence within circumscribed rules, I think another poster had talked about it once. There was Joshua, a famous warrier for example. (I'll point out is not so different than Islam, which has a lot of rules concerning warfare) - but much of that is in Jewish ancient history: Judaism and warfare - Wikipedia
What does ancient Jewish History have to do with today's invaders of Israel wanting to destroy that country and kill or enslave its people? (Ok, just make them their servants again)

Yes, they were warriors, and conquered some people like the Jebusites and Jerusalem. And many other tribes around the area, and it all became the Nation of Israel.

What does that have to do with how Jews have been for the past 2000 years, especially under Christian or Muslim rule?

It was just a side comment of interest - that's all Sixties. A lot of ancient religions had their roots in significant warriers or battles for survival. It's not a statement against anything.
 
But I had read that in it's background, Judaism had warriers and allowed for violence within circumscribed rules, I think another poster had talked about it once. There was Joshua, a famous warrier for example. (I'll point out is not so different than Islam, which has a lot of rules concerning warfare) - but much of that is in Jewish ancient history: Judaism and warfare - Wikipedia


"...But I had read....."


speaking of ...education......


i admit, my favorite author is Sidney Sheldon..... love his stories.


but....the people of today [you] -- go to wikipeda and blogs to glean information about important information.....omg.



mmmm. have you ever:


- Been in a library?


- Seen an actual encyclopedia or thumbed through one?


- Did a jigsaw puzzle or the "jumble"


- smelled the pages of a new paperback novel


- not walk down the block without your smart-phone in your face


LoL. I think i visited wikipedia once. I never even think to go there if i want to look up stuff.


'us education dept' - i wonder if they run to wikipedia to look up stuff.....brrr.
 
[ What BDS is all about. Please tell me that it is only about Israel, and that Russians, Turks, British, go through the same thing for occupying another people's land. Although, of course, is not "occupying" any other people's land]


The “three D” test is a definition of antisemitism crafted by Natan Sharansky, the former head of the Jewish Agency. In 2004, Sharansky outlined what he called “new antisemitism”.

Demonization, he wrote, is when Israel’s actions are blown out of all sensible proportion and comparisons are made, for example, between Israelis and Nazis, and between Palestinian refugee camps and Auschwitz. Double standard is when criticism of Israel is applied selectively and the Jewish state is singled out, for example, by the United Nations. Delegitimization, Sharansky wrote, is when Israel’s fundamental right to exist is denied.

The BDS campaign does not call for the boycott and divestment from Israel because it wants peace. It calls for a one-state solution, one which BDS supporters envisage will one day end the Zionist enterprise that led 70 years ago to the establishment of the world’s only Jewish state.

(full article online)

New antisemitism

I'm going to disagree a bit here, not because I particularly agree with BDS (it's frequent comparison's to apartheid are questionable, as is an insistence on right to return) - BUT, I went to their main webpage to see what they had to say about themselves. They don't call for a one state solution or any solution nor do they call for an end to Israel proper.

FAQs
The BDS movement aims to pressure Israel to respect international law by:


1. Ending its occupation and colonization of all Arab lands and dismantling the Wall
International law recognises the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, Gaza and the Syrian Golan Heights as occupied by Israel.


2. Recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality.


3. Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN resolution 194.


These are three basic rights without which the Palestinian people cannot exercise its inalienable right to self-determination.

The BDS movement does not advocate for a particular solution to the conflict and does not call for either a “one state solution” or a “two state solution”. Instead, BDS focuses on the realization of basic rights and the implementation of international law.
[1. Ending its occupation and colonization of all Arab lands and dismantling the Wall
International law recognises the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, Gaza and the Syrian Golan Heights as occupied by Israel.]

They may not be telling people this BUT All of Israel is considered Arab land.

Arab Israelis have full rights, to vote, work, etc

So, 1 and 2 are kind of confusing for those who do not know what is really on the mind of the Arab leaders, who have made it very clear in their Charters, that their final goal is the destruction of Israel by any means available.

For a discussion we can really only go by what they say and do, and they specified "West Bank, including East Jerusalem, Gaza and the Syrian Golan Heights" - if you have evidence that they want to "de-occupy" Israel proper - show me.

Are You kidding??!
This is the central activity of the organization, convince people that the Jewish nation has no right to exist, not one or two villages but ALL OF IT:
Israel's 1948 founding is 'occupation' in BDS resolution approved by student government - The College Fix

And that's before we even discuss the incitement to violence and openly antisemitic imagery used by the organization.

We have Buddhist countries actively committing genocide in horrific ways, we have Buddhist countries among those with the highest rates of child marriages human trafficking. Gender equality and human rights are a joke in those countries. So because they don't blow up over a cartoon
You are just not being honest. Islam is not just a religion because it is an ideology too. 53+ and all backwards even compared to Israel.

I'm being completely honest. I gave you relevent examples of other countries and other religions. If you can't accept that, it's not my honesty in question.

You are not. How many Buddhist countries approve overwhelmingly of murder over a cartoon? How
Many call for the genocide of Jews? This is silly.

Now you are moving the goalposts.

No I am not. There is a level of socially inferior and Islam countries are 100x worse than Buddhist counties. False equivalency by you. Like Judaism and Christianity it is a religion of peace. Islam was founded by a warlord.

We have Buddhist countries actively committing genocide in horrific ways, we have Buddhist countries among those with the highest rates of child marriages and human trafficking. Gender equality and human rights are a joke in those countries. So because they don't blow up over a cartoon they are better?

Thanks for providing more information though - you just hate Muslims right? If you knew anything about history you would know that no major religion is truly a religion of peace. It's never that simple.


"We have Buddhist countries actively committing genocide in horrific ways, we have Buddhist countries among those with the highest rates of child marriages and human trafficking. Gender equality and human rights are a joke in those countries. So because they don't blow up over a cartoon they are better?"

"...you just hate Muslims right? If you knew anything about history you would know that no major religion is truly a religion of peace. It's never that simple"



ok coyote. shhhh. rest.



OMG.
 


Of course it is - it's not applied the same in any other case where Jews are not involved, doubled with the demand that there's no Jewish state means it's nothing but antisemitism. The rhetoric used by Ash Sakar is a definite example of antisemitic bigotry used by the BDS:

WORKING DEFINITION OF ANTISEMITISM
  • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
  • Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
  • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
  • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
  • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
Examples of the ways in which antisemitism manifests itself with regard to the State of Israel taking into account the overall context could include:

  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
  • Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
  • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
  • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.
Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).

Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews.
 
They aren't? The problem with Jews moving into Palestine is that they always bring Israel with them. If Miko Peled, for example, built a house in Nabi Saleh I don't think anyone would have a problem with it.
And You don't see how racist is this statement?
+No. What is racist about it?
Because this is the same rhetoric that was used to ethnically cleanse
all of Middle Eastern Jews from Arab countries.

Also it's the same racist rhetoric that was used by Kant to justify discrimination against Jews in Europe, the only difference is that in the same 18th century racism, he referred to Jews as "Palestinians among us".
What is racist about a Jew living in a Palestinian village?

Because You use a BDS activist who promotes the most vile antisemitic bigotry,
openly and without shame :"Jews have reputation 4being sleazy thieves" as a standard for which Jews are "allowed".

And You still don't understand why BDS is called for its' antisemitism?
I don't know, :dunno: it as taken out of context.

Q. Racist hate speech may be justified by context?!
If the rumor about You being a teacher is correct, then I'm afraid to even imagine what You've passed to those poor naive kids in schools.

:1peleas:
 
Last edited:


Of course it is - it's not applied the same in any other case where Jews are not involved, doubled with the demand that there's no Jewish state means it's nothing but antisemitism. The rhetoric used by Ash Sakar is a definite example of antisemitic bigotry used by the BDS:

WORKING DEFINITION OF ANTISEMITISM
  • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
  • Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
  • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
  • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
  • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
Examples of the ways in which antisemitism manifests itself with regard to the State of Israel taking into account the overall context could include:

  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
  • Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
  • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
  • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.
Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).

Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews.

The anti Semite card is no longer the ace of trump.
 


Of course it is - it's not applied the same in any other case where Jews are not involved, doubled with the demand that there's no Jewish state means it's nothing but antisemitism. The rhetoric used by Ash Sakar is a definite example of antisemitic bigotry used by the BDS:

WORKING DEFINITION OF ANTISEMITISM
  • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
  • Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
  • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
  • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
  • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
Examples of the ways in which antisemitism manifests itself with regard to the State of Israel taking into account the overall context could include:

  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
  • Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
  • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
  • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.
Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).

Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews.

The anti Semite card is no longer the ace of trump.


Name one mostly Muslim country that is on par with Israel in terms of economy and social programs. You cannot. Why would Israel allow the terror state of Hamas to form a country? NEVER. Same with Fatah. NEVER.

If the people don't like it they may leave. 50+ other mostly Muslim nations. Surely one or two will take them in.
 


Of course it is - it's not applied the same in any other case where Jews are not involved, doubled with the demand that there's no Jewish state means it's nothing but antisemitism. The rhetoric used by Ash Sakar is a definite example of antisemitic bigotry used by the BDS:

WORKING DEFINITION OF ANTISEMITISM
  • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
  • Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
  • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
  • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
  • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
Examples of the ways in which antisemitism manifests itself with regard to the State of Israel taking into account the overall context could include:

  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
  • Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
  • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
  • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.
Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).

Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews.

The anti Semite card is no longer the ace of trump.

20 years of organized anti-Jewish propaganda, cant's be blamed on elections, her example is a vivid example of the specific systematic problem addressed by the Education Department, and rightfully so.

Q. Can You even agree that use of racist bigotry has no place in school and University?
 
Last edited:


Of course it is - it's not applied the same in any other case where Jews are not involved, doubled with the demand that there's no Jewish state means it's nothing but antisemitism. The rhetoric used by Ash Sakar is a definite example of antisemitic bigotry used by the BDS:

WORKING DEFINITION OF ANTISEMITISM
  • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
  • Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
  • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
  • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
  • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
Examples of the ways in which antisemitism manifests itself with regard to the State of Israel taking into account the overall context could include:

  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
  • Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
  • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
  • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.
Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).

Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews.

The anti Semite card is no longer the ace of trump.


Name one mostly Muslim country that is on par with Israel in terms of economy and social programs. You cannot. Why would Israel allow the terror state of Hamas to form a country? NEVER. Same with Fatah. NEVER.

If the people don't like it they may leave. 50+ other mostly Muslim nations. Surely one or two will take them in.

Nice deflection. :clap::clap::clap:
 
Last edited:


Of course it is - it's not applied the same in any other case where Jews are not involved, doubled with the demand that there's no Jewish state means it's nothing but antisemitism. The rhetoric used by Ash Sakar is a definite example of antisemitic bigotry used by the BDS:

WORKING DEFINITION OF ANTISEMITISM
  • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
  • Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
  • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
  • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
  • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
Examples of the ways in which antisemitism manifests itself with regard to the State of Israel taking into account the overall context could include:

  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
  • Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
  • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
  • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.
Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).

Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews.

The anti Semite card is no longer the ace of trump.


Name one mostly Muslim country that is on par with Israel in terms of economy and social programs. You cannot. Why would Israel allow the terror state of Hamas to form a country? NEVER. Same with Fatah. NEVER.

If the people don't like it they may leave. 50+ other mostly Muslim nations. Surely one or two will take them in.

Nice deflection. :clap::clap::clap:


Truth is not a deflection. If Mexico treated us the way Palestine treats Israel there would be no Mexico. Emojis are for children. Save it. Loser.
 
15th post


In other words, instead of doing the simplest thing - condemn racist bigotry,
BDS is pulling out another anti Jewish conspiracy theory,
just to prove further that You guys are nothing but KKK copycats.

Left Wing Antisemitism Keeps Growing on Campuses


Let them try that in front of me. Won't go well for them.

BDS = Bigots, Dumbasses and Sissies.


I don't know much about the US community from personal experience, but I grew up among lots of immigrant Mountain Jews in Israel. Very warm and protective community, no matter where they live, they don't pass any slightest suggestion of antisemitic bigotry without an appropriate response, and won't pass a fellow Jew in trouble, no matter what. It's a thing of honor. The US is probably a more "polite" place hence the BDS mobs that were allowed most basic proportions of civilized discourse, are still allowed to spread their bigotry and intimidate uninvolved Jews for simply having a free pass by the previous governments .
 


In other words, instead of doing the simplest thing - condemn racist bigotry,
BDS is pulling out another anti Jewish conspiracy theory,
just to prove further that You guys are nothing but KKK copycats.

Left Wing Antisemitism Keeps Growing on Campuses


Let them try that in front of me. Won't go well for them.

BDS = Bigots, Dumbasses and Sissies.


I don't know much about the US community from personal experience, but I grew up among lots of immigrant Mountain Jews in Israel. Very warm and protective community, no matter where they live, they don't pass any slightest suggestion of antisemitic bigotry without an appropriate response, and won't pass a fellow Jew in trouble, no matter what. It's a thing of honor. The US is probably a more polite place hence the BDS mobs that were allowed most basic proportions of civilized discourse, are still lowed to spread their bigotry and intimidate uninvolved Jews for simply having a free pass by the rotten media and previous governments.


The Jew hatred is alive and well in the US. They hide under the guise of "Anti Zionism" is not "Antisemitism". Problem is 99% of Jews are Zionists.
 


In other words, instead of doing the simplest thing - condemn racist bigotry,
BDS is pulling out another anti Jewish conspiracy theory,
just to prove further that You guys are nothing but KKK copycats.

Left Wing Antisemitism Keeps Growing on Campuses


Let them try that in front of me. Won't go well for them.

BDS = Bigots, Dumbasses and Sissies.


I don't know much about the US community from personal experience, but I grew up among lots of immigrant Mountain Jews in Israel. Very warm and protective community, no matter where they live, they don't pass any slightest suggestion of antisemitic bigotry without an appropriate response, and won't pass a fellow Jew in trouble, no matter what. It's a thing of honor. The US is probably a more polite place hence the BDS mobs that were allowed most basic proportions of civilized discourse, are still lowed to spread their bigotry and intimidate uninvolved Jews for simply having a free pass by the rotten media and previous governments.


The Jew hatred is alive and well in the US. They hide under the guise of "Anti Zionism" is not "Antisemitism". Problem is 99% of Jews are Zionists.


The case at hand deals with a BDS event where Jews were simply not allowed entrance like the rest of the audience. Unfortunately many western countries digressed to a point where antisemitism is allowed and promoted even in schools.

Jews are the canary of the world, every empire that let antisemitism thrive eventually went down the drain of history. All those countries today that witness a rise of antisemitic violence and do nothing - are in deep shit and in risk of losing their society.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom