Economically I'm ultra far left

"I have solved poverty in America.... we will give every American citizen $1,000,000 and it won't cost anything."

View attachment 552507


"Mr President!!"..."Mr President!!"..."Mr President!!"..."Mr President!!"...

View attachment 552508


Some would turn that one million into two million, while others would go broke and come back asking for more. The commies would say the broke MFs deserve more, that's how they buy their votes.

.
 
You have it COMPLETELY opposite. I have never met an independent that describes themselves as fiscally liberal and socially conservative. Most independents are exactly the opposite. They vote for Democrats because of social issues.

Again, you miss the point, Cleetus. Sure most people might DESCRIBE themselves as fiscally liberal... and as pointed out, they still want that social security, Medicare, unemployment and other "White People Welfare" that they think they are "entitled" to. Nobody but the ultra rich really want to live in a world without protections.


NOBODY with a brain or not indoctrinated votes for Democrats for economic issues. They are economically illeterate.

Really, then how come the GOP hasn't won the popular vote honestly since 1988? (No, I don't count 2004 when you guys cheated with Dibold Machines after scaring the country to death with a fake war on terror.)

People can vote on social issues when they can afford to ignore the economic issues. In short, when a Democrat fixes the last economic mess a Republican created.

We are idiots for wanting to keep more of the money we make? Democrats are the issue. Of course, they are going to vote to take more of my money. That doesn't make the smart, just lazy and greedy.

Uh, guy, most Republican voters come from the poorest parts of the Country in Jesusland. We've been over this. It isn't that you don't want to keep your money, you just live in fear of the darkies getting some.

Which again, you are fine with "Entitlements" but you hate "Welfare".
 
I support working less hours and days a week but with bigger payment I support welfare for everyone even the ones who work but don't earn above a certain amount so they can afford more some work but can not make a end with their bills I support free free housing for homeless free healthcare and to do that I support taxing the rich I support minimum taxes for the poor and low income classes

So you're a lazy fuck that doesnt want to work and you'd rather take money from those who work to support your lazy lifestyle.
I have zero respect for you.
 
I support working less hours and days a week but with bigger payment I support welfare for everyone even the ones who work but don't earn above a certain amount so they can afford more some work but can not make a end with their bills I support free free housing for homeless free healthcare and to do that I support taxing the rich I support minimum taxes for the poor and low income classes

Economically, you're a blithering idiot.
 
It only does because you believe it does.

There are many races and ethnic groups that have been telling you that you are wrong, but you don't listen to them.

I generally tend to ignore Uncle Toms and other sellouts, who think that if they shine the great man's shoes enough, they might get something.


You continue to push this race narrative, but it is false. Reagan appointed the first black cabinet member, Colin Powell, as the National Security Advisor, and the first Hispanic cabinet member, Lauro F. Cavazos, in the history of this nation.

Um, no. The first black cabinet member was Robert C. Weaver who was Secretary of HUD under Lyndon Johnson. Of course, Reagan appointed a black HUD Secretary and didn't know the man by name.


So yes, demand is up.

And how is that demand paid for?

Usually, by making these kids put themselves in hock, or making them compete for bullshit scholarships, or they can always do what I did and let the military abuse their bodies and minds for a couple of years.
 
The thing is, you commies are insuring poverty will never be solved. That is evidenced by you importing more than adequate supplies of it daily. That way you can keep it as an issue and never gain any ground. Propagandist like you just love talking out of both sides of your mouth and always look to other people to pay the freight on your little socialist programs. Tell the class, how many poor people you have living with you?

Well, I did order one of the Filipina Mail Order Brides, but they forgot to punch the holes in the box and I had quite the mess on my hands...

Okay, let's get serious for a moment. You guys whine all the time about illegal immigration, and then don't realize your policies cause it. You've determines some jobs just won't pay a living wage. So yes, you are going to get people from countries that have even more severe cases of Capitalism show up to take our bottom rung jobs.

You could end the Illegal problem in five minutes. Enact a living wage, enforce workplace compliance. The rich will hate it, and the lazy white American who goes to the Home Depot might be upset when he can't find any day laborers... but there you are.
 
Well, I did order one of the Filipina Mail Order Brides, but they forgot to punch the holes in the box and I had quite the mess on my hands...

Okay, let's get serious for a moment. You guys whine all the time about illegal immigration, and then don't realize your policies cause it. You've determines some jobs just won't pay a living wage. So yes, you are going to get people from countries that have even more severe cases of Capitalism show up to take our bottom rung jobs.

You could end the Illegal problem in five minutes. Enact a living wage, enforce workplace compliance. The rich will hate it, and the lazy white American who goes to the Home Depot might be upset when he can't find any day laborers... but there you are.


Only really ignorant people think all jobs should pay a living wage. A high school student living with mommy and daddy doesn't need a living wage. They're just looking for some extra pocket money and initial work experience. Anyone who works those types of jobs later in life are just losers.

.
 
I support working less hours and days a week but with bigger payment I support welfare for everyone even the ones who work but don't earn above a certain amount so they can afford more some work but can not make a end with their bills I support free free housing for homeless free healthcare and to do that I support taxing the rich I support minimum taxes for the poor and low income classes


IOW, you prefer wishcasting, however futile it may be, to actually taking responsibility for oneself.
 
Only really ignorant people think all jobs should pay a living wage. A high school student living with mommy and daddy doesn't need a living wage. They're just looking for some extra pocket money and initial work experience. Anyone who works those types of jobs later in life are just losers.

Why shouldn't they work a living wage? Also, why do you think Child Exploitation is a good thing.

1634429719046.png

1634429731870.png

Just remember, someone got rich off of this shit, too... and it was just as wrong.
 
Which makes them....? Which makes them....? Economic idiots.

The pig doesn't know WHY he is so hungry...he just is.

Given the opportunity the pig will consume everything because it is there.
No it does not. It makes them American Consumers. Go ahead and be a dick and mock folks.
 
How about it?

In principle, it's an awful idea.
In practice, you probably need it to produce jobs, keep strategic industries in the US, etc.
Agreed.
Who would have ever thought that the global supply chain would have become a heavy hitter in headlines? "What? My milk is 5.00 a gallon?"
 
No crystal ball. I see an example of it right now. In the ultra-liberal county where my mother lives, and thus there are all sorts of giveaway policies, the people who never saved enough to pay for assisted living get an upscale new facility, complete with a gorgeous dining room and granite/stainless steel kitchens, pay a pittance to live there. My mother lives across the street in a comfortable but not lavish facility for which she pays 5x as much.

My sister and I joke that once Mom‘s money runs low enough, she can move to an upscale place and live with the other low-income people. Right now she’s too rich to afford it.
So what? What is paying for that ultra-liberal county assisted living you are whining about? Private insurance? Medicare, Medicade? What?
 
Again, you miss the point, Cleetus. Sure most people might DESCRIBE themselves as fiscally liberal... and as pointed out, they still want that social security, Medicare, unemployment and other "White People Welfare" that they think they are "entitled" to. Nobody but the ultra rich really want to live in a world without protections.




Really, then how come the GOP hasn't won the popular vote honestly since 1988? (No, I don't count 2004 when you guys cheated with Dibold Machines after scaring the country to death with a fake war on terror.)

People can vote on social issues when they can afford to ignore the economic issues. In short, when a Democrat fixes the last economic mess a Republican created.



Uh, guy, most Republican voters come from the poorest parts of the Country in Jesusland. We've been over this. It isn't that you don't want to keep your money, you just live in fear of the darkies getting some.

Which again, you are fine with "Entitlements" but you hate "Welfare".
"Cleetus"
I swear to the mighty Orange former POTUS, that shit is dope funny!
 

Forum List

Back
Top