Economically I'm ultra far left

[DBA]

BS. Love your crystal ball.

It doesn't take a crystal ball, just a little common sense, to see where we are headed.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I support working less hours and days a week but with bigger payment I support welfare for everyone even the ones who work but don't earn above a certain amount so they can afford more some work but can not make a end with their bills I support free free housing for homeless free healthcare and to do that I support taxing the rich I support minimum taxes for the poor and low income classes

Thank God I know your position. Now I can sleep

 

[Resnic]

I support working less hours and days a week but with bigger payment I support welfare for everyone even the ones who work but don't earn above a certain amount so they can afford more some work but can not make a end with their bills I support free free housing for homeless free healthcare and to do that I support taxing the rich I support minimum taxes for the poor and low income classes

I can tell your far left because you just repeated some very basic sentences and had no real reasons on why you support those things.

You just regurgitated a couple statements and left, so yeah that's what the far left do.

 

[Flash]

I support working less hours and days a week but with bigger payment I support welfare for everyone even the ones who work but don't earn above a certain amount so they can afford more some work but can not make a end with their bills I support free free housing for homeless free healthcare and to do that I support taxing the rich I support minimum taxes for the poor and low income classes

If this is a joke then you are not as funny as you think you are.

If it is not a joke then you are one sick puppy.

 

[DBA]

I wonder if you are a black man who is racist against whites or a self-loathing leftist fool. I suspect the latter, since the black people I know are actually embarrassed, or even irate, by what the left is doing.

Joe is an old loser white guy filled with guilt who is overcompensating for a severe case of racism towards miniorities with reverse racism. Seems to be a trend among Democrats.

 

[Flash]

Economically, most people are far left.

If we decided elections on purely economic issues, the Democrats/Liberals/whatever would win every time.

Sadly, we have social issues to keep the right in business playing on people's religious, racial and sexual fears.

No Moon Bat, as usual you are confused. Most people aren't welfare queens like you sicko Moon Bats.

 

[Lisa558]

Joe is an old loser white guy filled with guilt who is overcompensating for a severe case of racism towards miniorities with reverse racism. Seems to be a trend among Democrats.

Thank you. I’m still learning the ropes around here and getting of sense of who’s who.

 

[MisterBeale]

Again- Ronald Reagan talking about "Welfare Queens" and "Young Bucks".

This isn't an issue in monocultures of Europe and Japan. it only becomes a divide in the US because it intersects with race, but everything in America intersects with race.

It only does because you believe it does.

There are many races and ethnic groups that have been telling you that you are wrong, but you don't listen to them.

You continue to push this race narrative, but it is false. Reagan appointed the first black cabinet member, Colin Powell, as the National Security Advisor, and the first Hispanic cabinet member, Lauro F. Cavazos, in the history of this nation.

You keep beating on this race paradigm, but it is a false one. Give it up.

 

[MisterBeale]

So knowing that you need a BA to get a good life, yes, demand is up.

So yes, demand is up.

And how is that demand paid for?

 

[MisterBeale]

Jesus.

I suppose you believe paying for TEE VEE is a necessity, eh?

Or how about a monthly cell phone bill, you believe that is a necessity?

. . . or, if you live in a temperate climate, do you believe that electricity is a necessity?

What do you believe you know?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

"I have solved poverty in America.... we will give every American citizen $1,000,000 and it won't cost anything."

"Mr President!!"..."Mr President!!"..."Mr President!!"..."Mr President!!"...

 

[Burgermeister]

I assume the OP was a joke. Regardless, the left would be well-served to study how communism treats slackers. You better be working your ass off for those crumbs. The lumpenproletariat are not treated well if not eliminated.

 

[my2¢]

I'm ultra liberal economically only up to a point. I'd put that point at 18-years-old for those without severe physical or mental disabilities. Beyond that for the well abled I'd limit support to education and technical training.

 

[Otis Mayfield]

trump's only accomplishment was cutting taxes for the rich. It's all the Republican congress would give him.

A man making a million dollars a year saw $69,900 in tax savings and that's per year, forever.

Along with that, trump gutted the IRS. Now the IRS can't collect taxes from the rich so it's much easier for the rich to cheat.

So what's this mean for working people? Higher taxes. Cutting taxes for the rich just shifts the tax burden from the backs of the rich onto the backs of working people

The tax shortfall must be made up. If the rich don't pay taxes, the working people will.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Are they?

Most people just want to have a roof over their heads and food on the table. If left to the right, they'd have a hard time doing that.

Used to be, you graduated high school, you joined a union, you were able to make a living wage and start a family.

Today, thanks to the wonders of conservatism, you leave college with a mountain of debt, you end up in a job with no protections, and you maybe put off having a family until your 30's when the Biological clock is ticking down.

I agree, the 47% who keep voting Republican are fucking idiots economically.

And the government taking money and giving to people who don't work helps what exactly? I mean other than encourage people not to work and allows druggies to live their lifestyle.

Oh and unions? How many businesses have our corrupt unions put under or would have put under without the government bailing out their lazy asses? Cost increase? You mean inflation? That's a left thing that happens when the swamp spends us into debt forcing up the cost of living.

 

[MisterBeale]

 

[BluesLegend]

I support working less hours and days a week but with bigger payment I support welfare for everyone even the ones who work but don't earn above a certain amount so they can afford more some work but can not make a end with their bills I support free free housing for homeless free healthcare and to do that I support taxing the rich I support minimum taxes for the poor and low income classes

So basically you are a mooching sponge deadbeat got it. Get a lob loser pay your own way.

 

[MisterBeale]

You mean inflation? That's a left thing that happens when the swamp spends us into debt forcing up the cost of living.

Ostensibly, both the left and the right support the existence of the banking cabal and the Federal Reserve. When ever I post about the corruption and the socialist nature of the FED, I get attacked by both folks on the left and the right.

But? You are correct, the devaluation of the dollar, is the biggest and most direct sabotage of the purchasing power on both the poor and the middle classes.

Ironically, it is mostly the left that wants to expand the power of the corporate & banking classes ability to sap wealth out of the economy for more war and social programs.

It used to be axiomatic, at least before the 70's, more debt, led to less economic growth. The more the STATE took on in debt, the harder it is to encourage growth. Now, they use a bunch of fancy tricks, I don't completely understand to counter that.

. . . but it still doesn't solve the problem of shifting wealth upwards and sapping purchasing power from the poor and middle classes.

Clamoring for less fiscal restraint and more government will only make things worse, until at long last, the government is insolvent, and the only solution, is either revolution, or a complete global technocratic police state.

I'm not sure the latter will work, at least not in perpetuity, because it denies basic humanity.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Or we can make sure the money we do have is fairly distributed.

The bottom 40% in this country control less than 1% of the wealth.

The middle 20% in this country control 5% of the wealth.

The next to top 20% control 8% of the wealth. (I think with my current income, this is where I fall, but I have to work 80 hours a week to get there.)

The top 20% control 87% of the wealth.
The top 1% control 43% of the wealth.

It's not an issue of "money Trees", it's how wealth is distributed.

/——/ So gubmint’s job is to distribute money equally regardless of one’s efforts and skills? Don’t you realize the money will just redistribute back to the people it was taken from?
Poverty is a state of mind it has nothing to do with a lack of money.

 

[OKTexas]

Another one who misses the point... See the above post and if you are still confused, I'll explain the big words to you.

The thing is, you commies are insuring poverty will never be solved. That is evidenced by you importing more than adequate supplies of it daily. That way you can keep it as an issue and never gain any ground. Propagandist like you just love talking out of both sides of your mouth and always look to other people to pay the freight on your little socialist programs. Tell the class, how many poor people you have living with you?

.