Easy To Convince The Uneducated

Re-post your response without vulgarity.....as though you were an adult, and I'll destroy your comment, as it should be.

If you acted with even a modicum of good faith, I might. As it is, that 'vulgarity' was hardly worth mentioning. The fact you did, suggests you are already on the back foot. As you should be.



I notice you didn't repost.
 
Clearly you didn't know, and now you do what Leftists do, pro forma.....you lie and obfuscate.

Says the dumb arse who posted a clearly edited video trying to prove a 'point'. Also, where did I even say Kurdistan was a country. Dumbarse.


Bet you don't know you posted that twice.


There may be a medication for echolalia .....speak to your doctor to see if its right for you.



....after you look up 'echolalia.'
 
If you weren't lying again, you'd post a putative 'unedited' video.

Why would I? All you have done is shown an edited video of Biden saying he was going to take away $1 billion worth of US aid/trade to the Ukraine. You gave no context. All you did was infer he was doing so because his son was being investigated by a Ukraine prosecutor, whereas he said - and this is backed up the Ukraine itself - it had nothing to do with any investigation of his son. It had to do with the prosecutor being corrupt.

What point you should have made if that is your contention - but you didn't and this could help you POV - is why is Biden so interested in this prosecutor being dumped? Why would the US give a flying fuck about this guy. That could be interesting to know.
 
If you weren't lying again, you'd post a putative 'unedited' video.

Why would I? All you have done is shown an edited video of Biden saying he was going to take away $1 billion worth of US aid/trade to the Ukraine. You gave no context. All you did was infer he was doing so because his son was being investigated by a Ukraine prosecutor, whereas he said - and this is backed up the Ukraine itself - it had nothing to do with any investigation of his son. It had to do with the prosecutor being corrupt.

What point you should have made if that is your contention - but you didn't and this could help you POV - is why is Biden so interested in this prosecutor being dumped? Why would the US give a flying fuck about this guy. That could be interesting to know.


So there is no such 'edited' video.

What is the cause of your constant lying????
 
[

Bet you don't know you posted that twice.

There may be a medication for echolalia .....speak to your doctor to see if its right for you.

....after you look up 'echolalia.'

M'eh who knows why I posted it twice. I hit the edit button and it's come up again. I'm no back-end website specialist. Nor do I pretend to be or want to be. Have your little 'victory'. Says more about you than anything - none of it good.

Don't need to look it up. Have I heard of it? No. I'm guessing the first four letters give an inkling of what it means...
 
Now.....what are the books you can claim informed your geopolitical insights?
You're something else, very Trump-ish. But since you asked so nicely:
Mein Kampf
Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital
Bible (OT & NT)
Mad Magazine



You needn't have proved my contention....it's a given that I am always correct.

Liberals....dunces like you, have no knowledge based on study, on erudition.....you simply imbibe propaganda, and vote as ordered by your masters.
 
Liberals....dunces like you, have no knowledge based on study, on erudition.....you simply imbibe propaganda, and vote as ordered by your masters.
Yet you are one of the finest purveyor of propaganda on USMB and I just can't seem to accept your lies. What are you doing wrong?
 
Liberals....dunces like you, have no knowledge based on study, on erudition.....you simply imbibe propaganda, and vote as ordered by your masters.
Yet you are one of the finest purveyor of propaganda on USMB and I just can't seem to accept your lies. What are you doing wrong?


You haven't found a single lie.


Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.
 
You haven't found a single lie.
I have to admit it is hard to pick just a single lie but here's a classic from #20:

Most voted against the Democrats

Care to explain?



We don't count the votes of the illegal aliens that Obama told to go vote.


1. "Officially, Clinton has beaten Trump in the popular vote by approximately 2.5 million."

If you count Illegal aliens and dead folks.

How many of the 30 million illegal aliens voted?
Any?

How many?


2. "Be careful about sources."
OK.....you try:

How's this....LA Times:

7. "If you’ve visited the DMV in the last few weeks, you may have noticed that you can now complete your voter registration at the same time you renew your driver’s license — without having to fill out a separate form.... they will be registered as having no party preference. " Registered to vote at the DMV? Check again. Many who use the new process miss a vital step two


Wanna deny this:

6. "12 States (and DC) That Allow Driver's Licenses for People in the Country Illegally" 12 States (and DC) That Allow Driver's Licenses for People in the Country Illegally - Illegal Immigration - ProCon.org


How about disqualifying this guy...




3. "Clinton has beaten Trump in the popular vote by approximately 2.5 million."

Yup....but not if you only count legal voters.

"Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama."
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...tizens-Vote-in-US-Elections-Richman-et-al.pdf



Now....if 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted last time

....and now
a. their icon, Obama, told them to vote and not be concerned that there would be any penalty (as per the video)

and...

b. the central issue in Trump's campaign was throwing them out of the nation that they invaded....


....ya' think maybe 13.2%....or 17.6%.....or more of 'em voted??????


You betcha'!!!!!!!






QED....Trump had more AMERICAN votes.
 
1. Of course, that is the mission of government school, owned and operated by Democrats/Progressives.
The Kurd kerfuffle is a case in point.
Trump promised disengagement from the perpetual wars of the Middle East....who complained then?

Now, saving American soldier's lives isn't important.



2. America made promises....in writing.....to the Ukraine, which Hussein didn't choose to fulfill,
....we'd protect them from a Russian invasion if they turned over nuclear weapons....

...and you had no problem with his refusal.....but now you choose to support Marxists and use this move as a cudgel to beat an American President.

On December 5, 1994 the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Britain and the United States signed a memorandum to provide Ukraine with security assurances in connection with its accession to the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state.
Nuclear weapons and Ukraine - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Nuclear_weapons_and_Ukraine





3. Who, exactly are we there to defend???

A quick trip to Wikipedia:

"The Kurdistan Workers' Party or PKK (Kurdish: Partiya Karkerên Kurdistanê‎[a]) is a Kurdish far-left militant and political organization based in Turkey and Iraq. Since 1984 the PKK has been involved in an armed conflict with the Turkish state (with a two-year cease-fire during 2013–2015), with the initial aim of achieving an independent Kurdish state, later changing it to a demand for equal rights and Kurdish autonomy in Turkey.[16][17][18][19]

The PKK was founded in 1978 in the village of Fis (near Lice) by a group of Kurdish students led by Abdullah Öcalan[20] and 1979 it made its existence known to tthehe public.[21]The PKK's ideology was originally a fusion of revolutionary socialism and Kurdish nationalism, seeking the foundation of an independent Communist state in the region,....

Ideology Kurdish nationalism[1]
Communalism
Democratic confederalism[2]
Libertarian socialism[3]
Jineology
Anti-capitalism"
Kurdistan Workers' Party - Wikipedia

Just what the Democrat Party stands for, too.




4. "Christian Fighters Abandon Anti-ISIS Kurd Group Because It's Communist
... many of the most motivated Western fighters are Christian crusaders eager to defeat the armies of Muhammad, but they were shocked to learn they'd joined up with a bunch of Kurdish atheist commies to do it:
Christian Fighters Abandon Anti-ISIS Kurd Group Because It's Communist




QED....if you know nothing, you'll fall for anything.



Some posters may be able to recall then the Democrat Party demanded we leave our allies in South Vietnam to the tender mercy of the communist forces....

Leftist intellectuals such as Susan Sontag was one of a legion of what Paul Hollander identified as “political pilgrims” who journeyed to Communist countries in search of an earthly paradise, and nearly always persuaded themselves that they had found it. Sure enough, Sontag was “…struck by the grace, variety, and established identity of the Vietnamese…an effectively organized society…’ And she explained why she traveled to North Vietnam: “Vietnam offered the key to a systematic criticism of America.” Paul Hollander, “Political Pilgrims: Western Intellectuals in Search of the Good Society,” p. 198, 271.

a. Ramsey Clark, LBJ’s attorney general: “You can see no internal conflict in the country….a unity in spirit. I doubt seriously that I could walk in safety in Saigon or the cities and villages of South Vietnam, as I have here…” Ibid.

b. Novelist Mary McCarthy decided that North Vietnam is preferable to South Vietnam, as she never saw a child with a dirty face, nor beggars, nor prostitutes nor squalor. “Wherever you go, you are met with smiles, cheers, hand clapping.” Mary McCarthy, “The Seventeenth Degree,” p. 215,222. Confronted with the fact that the North has no free press, she opined that the right to criticize is just another “capitalist luxury.”

c. McCarthy went on to explain it was America’s fault…”Until the Americans go home, …the self-imposed rationing system in the realm of ideas that limited the [North Vietnamese] diet to what was strictly necessary to the national interest [must remain]…” Ibid. Of course, after the Americans left, totalitarians continued to be totalitarians.




In 1979, Humanitas, the organization of anti-war activist Joan Baez, purchased a newspaper ad that ran in five large circulation dailies, called “An Open Letter to the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,” which ran in part: “Thousands of innocent Vietnamese, many of whose only “crimes” are those of conscience, are being arrested, detained and tortured in prison and re-education camps… The jails are overflowing with thousands upon thousands of “detainees”… People disappear and never return… People are used as human mine detectors, clearing live mine fields with their hands and feet. For many, life is hell and death is prayed for. With tragic irony, the cruelty, violence and oppression practiced by foreign powers in your country for more than a century continue today under the present regime.

It was an abiding commitment to fundamental principles of human dignity, freedom and self-determination that motivated so many Americans to oppose the government of South Vietnam and our country's participation in the war. It is that same commitment that compels us to speak out against your brutal disregard of human rights. As in the 60s, we raise our voices now so that your people may live. http://www.american-buddha.com/lit.voicesingwith6.1.htm


Joan Baez mailed the letter to 350 anti-war activists. Among those who refused to sign was Jane Fonda. “Your name would mean much more than any other,” she told Fonda, in a long letter. Fonda wrote that the add would lend credence to those who believe “that Communism is worse than death…” Washington Post, Lynn Darling, “Joan Baez at 38,” June 29, 1979



But of course the Democrats/Liberal were justified because the South Vietnamese were known to be terrorists....



Oh....wait.....
That's the Kurds that the Democrats are now supporting!!!


"The US State Department admitted on Friday that it had always viewed the Syrian Democratic Forces, a group that the US helped create, as including components of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), which the US views as a terrorist organization."
State Department Distrust of Syrian Kurds Paved the Way for Betrayal
 
1. Of course, that is the mission of government school, owned and operated by Democrats/Progressives.
The Kurd kerfuffle is a case in point.
Trump promised disengagement from the perpetual wars of the Middle East....who complained then?

Now, saving American soldier's lives isn't important.



2. America made promises....in writing.....to the Ukraine, which Hussein didn't choose to fulfill,
....we'd protect them from a Russian invasion if they turned over nuclear weapons....

...and you had no problem with his refusal.....but now you choose to support Marxists and use this move as a cudgel to beat an American President.

On December 5, 1994 the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Britain and the United States signed a memorandum to provide Ukraine with security assurances in connection with its accession to the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state.
Nuclear weapons and Ukraine - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Nuclear_weapons_and_Ukraine





3. Who, exactly are we there to defend???

A quick trip to Wikipedia:

"The Kurdistan Workers' Party or PKK (Kurdish: Partiya Karkerên Kurdistanê‎[a]) is a Kurdish far-left militant and political organization based in Turkey and Iraq. Since 1984 the PKK has been involved in an armed conflict with the Turkish state (with a two-year cease-fire during 2013–2015), with the initial aim of achieving an independent Kurdish state, later changing it to a demand for equal rights and Kurdish autonomy in Turkey.[16][17][18][19]

The PKK was founded in 1978 in the village of Fis (near Lice) by a group of Kurdish students led by Abdullah Öcalan[20] and 1979 it made its existence known to tthehe public.[21]The PKK's ideology was originally a fusion of revolutionary socialism and Kurdish nationalism, seeking the foundation of an independent Communist state in the region,....

Ideology Kurdish nationalism[1]
Communalism
Democratic confederalism[2]
Libertarian socialism[3]
Jineology
Anti-capitalism"
Kurdistan Workers' Party - Wikipedia

Just what the Democrat Party stands for, too.




4. "Christian Fighters Abandon Anti-ISIS Kurd Group Because It's Communist
... many of the most motivated Western fighters are Christian crusaders eager to defeat the armies of Muhammad, but they were shocked to learn they'd joined up with a bunch of Kurdish atheist commies to do it:
Christian Fighters Abandon Anti-ISIS Kurd Group Because It's Communist




QED....if you know nothing, you'll fall for anything.



"The New Hawks
The most astonishing feature of the latest Democratic debate, at least in our view, is the glimpse it provides of what might be called the new hawks. These would be the Democrats who are preening with outrage over President Trump’s betrayal of the gallant Kurds. And his ordering American GIs in northern Syria to stand aside for the Turks. Surely one of them, we thought, would declare for going on the offensive.

Feature, though, what happened when Anderson Cooper of CNN turned to foreign policy and asked Vice President Biden whether he would send troops back in “to prevent an ISIS resurgence and protect our Kurdish allies?” Mr. Biden averred that what Mr. Trump did was “the most shameful thing that any president has done in modern history — excuse me, in terms of foreign policy.”

Mr. Biden didn’t, though, say he’d send our troops back in — only that he’d be “making it real clear to Assad that, in fact, where he’s going to have a problem — because Turkey is the real problem here.” When pressed, he said he’d use air cover. No followup about his debate in 2008, when Mr. Biden was so dovish on Iraq that Governor Palin observed he was waving “the white flag of surrender.”
The New Hawks
 
1. Of course, that is the mission of government school, owned and operated by Democrats/Progressives.
The Kurd kerfuffle is a case in point.
Trump promised disengagement from the perpetual wars of the Middle East....who complained then?

Now, saving American soldier's lives isn't important.



2. America made promises....in writing.....to the Ukraine, which Hussein didn't choose to fulfill,
....we'd protect them from a Russian invasion if they turned over nuclear weapons....

...and you had no problem with his refusal.....but now you choose to support Marxists and use this move as a cudgel to beat an American President.

On December 5, 1994 the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Britain and the United States signed a memorandum to provide Ukraine with security assurances in connection with its accession to the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state.
Nuclear weapons and Ukraine - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Nuclear_weapons_and_Ukraine





3. Who, exactly are we there to defend???

A quick trip to Wikipedia:

"The Kurdistan Workers' Party or PKK (Kurdish: Partiya Karkerên Kurdistanê‎[a]) is a Kurdish far-left militant and political organization based in Turkey and Iraq. Since 1984 the PKK has been involved in an armed conflict with the Turkish state (with a two-year cease-fire during 2013–2015), with the initial aim of achieving an independent Kurdish state, later changing it to a demand for equal rights and Kurdish autonomy in Turkey.[16][17][18][19]

The PKK was founded in 1978 in the village of Fis (near Lice) by a group of Kurdish students led by Abdullah Öcalan[20] and 1979 it made its existence known to tthehe public.[21]The PKK's ideology was originally a fusion of revolutionary socialism and Kurdish nationalism, seeking the foundation of an independent Communist state in the region,....

Ideology Kurdish nationalism[1]
Communalism
Democratic confederalism[2]
Libertarian socialism[3]
Jineology
Anti-capitalism"
Kurdistan Workers' Party - Wikipedia

Just what the Democrat Party stands for, too.




4. "Christian Fighters Abandon Anti-ISIS Kurd Group Because It's Communist
... many of the most motivated Western fighters are Christian crusaders eager to defeat the armies of Muhammad, but they were shocked to learn they'd joined up with a bunch of Kurdish atheist commies to do it:
Christian Fighters Abandon Anti-ISIS Kurd Group Because It's Communist




QED....if you know nothing, you'll fall for anything.



"The Syrian Kurds sometimes overlap with the PKK, an internationally recognized terrorist organization that is associated with the Syrian and Turkish Communist parties. PKK is not supported by all the Kurds in Syria, but they have substantially infiltrated that body of Kurds that made common cause with the West in destroying ISIS in Syria and Iraq.

They were doubtless useful allies in that conflict, but they also destabilized as best they could all the surrounding governments, and the picture being painted by both the Left and the neoconservative Right in Washington of the Trump administration deserting gallant and constant allies is bunk. The Kurds were constantly threatening to release all the ISIS prisoners (and their families) that they were holding, and they always drew the Turks out in hot pursuit of them after border outrages."
Trump's Big Move On Turkey May Gain U.S. Goals
 

Forum List

Back
Top