Can you tell me which particular military member she is personally intervening in, and pressuring them to deny?
Thank you, I will await your deflection.
She said 1000. Ask her.
You don’t seem to have understood the question. I put it in bold it for you, so won’t miss it this time.
She is denying 1000 of them.
Oh? Please provide me a link that shows she is interfering in the Internal process and telling them to deny those promotions because I haven’t seen anything to that affect. I think you are flailing in defense of anything Trump.
Holding them up isn't interfering?
You are a moron.
You do not understand the question?
What internal process is she interfering in?
Who is she pressuring the military to deny a promotion to?
She is denying promotion to 1000 members of the military due for promotion. When I was an O-2, the budget was in such crappy shape, I wore O-3 for over a year before getting paid for it!
Can you show me where holding up equals denial?
Those personnel will not get the respect offered the higher rank and it will cost them money. You must think it would be OK if they were never promoted. They don't get back pay!
Nope, don’t think it is ok.
Do you think it is ok for the President to interfere in promotions for political vengeance?
You're making that accusation, The military has different values that affect promotion and Pres. Trump doesn't have to interfere. Vindman cut his career short because of his political ideology. Political ideology/influence is not acceptable in the military. It's a career killer.
The military put him on the list. They therefore must not have felt as you do. And Trump should not be pressuring them on it. I disagree with what you say about Vindman, but that is neither here nor there. If the felt he deserved promotion, it should not n
be subject to a political vendetta. The president fired him, as is his right to do, but to exact vengeance in this way is wrong.
~~~~~~
Adam Schiff’s star witness Alexander Vindman testified to the House Intel Committee that he “thought” the President was wrong in his policy with Ukraine.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
The Washington Examiner reported:
“This is a bad look for him to be in uniform,” an active duty military officer stationed at the Pentagon told the Washington Examiner. “He makes it look like the Army is behind this. Like the Army is pushing a coup.”
Another officer was concerned that Vindman’s testimony veered too much into personal assessment. “I don't care what he thinks, he's entitled to his opinion," the officer said. "But it's an opinion and he should give it without the uniform."
A third officer said that Vindman's weight indicated he would be unlikely to pass the Combat Fitness Test even though he had achieved a Ranger tab earlier in his career.
Military detailees generally are assigned to a unit within the Department of Defense for administrative issues such as leave and pay. Performance reports, however, are handled by the individual’s boss on the NSC.
Most NSC staffers are drawn from the military and various other government agencies. They generally are recruited via word-of-mouth, another change from typical government agencies that are notorious for their long application processes.
Vindman has hurt if not totally destroyed his Performance Record and advancement by testifying and advising his Ukrainian counterparts against Trump National policies. That's a big no, no. That was not his job. That alone would have affected his Performance Evaluation.
Unfortunately you have no military experience to enable you to understand how the military works.
