Don't look now...but the Patriots are PO'd!

Another meltdown, another personal attack

What personal attack? Did you not misquote me?
Personal attack because you attribute the incorrect assumptions to me.
I attributed YET ANOTHER misquote to you! It's what you do...
For some reason you seem to think it's fine to misquote someone while whining about rule breaking in the NFL. It doesn't appear to dawn on you that you are what you rail against here.
what is the misquote

You really don't know how quotes work...do you? Did you go to school, Phallics? This is something that should have been covered in 9th Grade English.
can you source that?
 
I admitted that the Patriots violated an NFL rule on where you were allowed to film from...something that other teams had been doing as well...yet the Patriots were the only ones hit with punishments.

Will you admit that the NFL has never proven that the Patriots did anything wrong with game balls?
According to the standard agreed to in the CBA I believe the NFL in part because Brady obstructed the investigation which tainted the findings.

You believe what? What did the NFL ever prove, Phallics? They ended up giving up trying to prove Brady had anything to do with deflating balls illegally. They were basing their suspension solely on his destroying his cell phone.
So you agree Brady destroyed evidence
 
I admitted that the Patriots violated an NFL rule on where you were allowed to film from...something that other teams had been doing as well...yet the Patriots were the only ones hit with punishments.

Will you admit that the NFL has never proven that the Patriots did anything wrong with game balls?
According to the standard agreed to in the CBA I believe the NFL in part because Brady obstructed the investigation which tainted the findings.

You believe what? What did the NFL ever prove, Phallics? They ended up giving up trying to prove Brady had anything to do with deflating balls illegally. They were basing their suspension solely on his destroying his cell phone.
So you agree Brady destroyed evidence

I agree that he destroyed his cell phone. That there was ever "evidence" contained on that phone is total speculation on your and the NFL's part. Tom Brady has a right to privacy just as you and I do. He didn't give up that right when he joined the NFL despite what Roger Goodell mistakenly thinks.
 
What personal attack? Did you not misquote me?
Personal attack because you attribute the incorrect assumptions to me.
I attributed YET ANOTHER misquote to you! It's what you do...
For some reason you seem to think it's fine to misquote someone while whining about rule breaking in the NFL. It doesn't appear to dawn on you that you are what you rail against here.
what is the misquote

You really don't know how quotes work...do you? Did you go to school, Phallics? This is something that should have been covered in 9th Grade English.
can you source that?

You want me to "source" 9th Grade English for you? There are any number of great reference books that explain the proper way to quote others. I would suggest you get off your ass and go peruse some of them. If you hadn't slept through Freshman English you'd already know this stuff!
 
I admitted that the Patriots violated an NFL rule on where you were allowed to film from...something that other teams had been doing as well...yet the Patriots were the only ones hit with punishments.

Will you admit that the NFL has never proven that the Patriots did anything wrong with game balls?
According to the standard agreed to in the CBA I believe the NFL in part because Brady obstructed the investigation which tainted the findings.

You believe what? What did the NFL ever prove, Phallics? They ended up giving up trying to prove Brady had anything to do with deflating balls illegally. They were basing their suspension solely on his destroying his cell phone.
So you agree Brady destroyed evidence

I agree that he destroyed his cell phone. That there was ever "evidence" contained on that phone is total speculation on your and the NFL's part. Tom Brady has a right to privacy just as you and I do. He didn't give up that right when he joined the NFL despite what Roger Goodell mistakenly thinks.

Oldstyle: "That there was ever "evidence" contained on that phone is total speculation on your and the NFL's part." If he played for any other team than the Patriots your position would be much different.
 
Personal attack because you attribute the incorrect assumptions to me.
I attributed YET ANOTHER misquote to you! It's what you do...
For some reason you seem to think it's fine to misquote someone while whining about rule breaking in the NFL. It doesn't appear to dawn on you that you are what you rail against here.
what is the misquote

You really don't know how quotes work...do you? Did you go to school, Phallics? This is something that should have been covered in 9th Grade English.
can you source that?

You want me to "source" 9th Grade English for you? There are any number of great reference books that explain the proper way to quote others. I would suggest you get off your ass and go peruse some of them. If you hadn't slept through Freshman English you'd already know this stuff!
You are the one with the criticism, why don't you show how it's done.
 
For starters, Phallics...you aren't allowed to put a period in a sentence where there was none and then attribute that sentence as someone's quote. When you do so you're claiming that was the whole sentence...when in fact it was not. That's misquoting someone and it's something you do regularly here! You deliberately leave out whole sections of people's sentences trying to give them a different meaning. It's a sleazy thing to do.
 
I admitted that the Patriots violated an NFL rule on where you were allowed to film from...something that other teams had been doing as well...yet the Patriots were the only ones hit with punishments.

Will you admit that the NFL has never proven that the Patriots did anything wrong with game balls?
According to the standard agreed to in the CBA I believe the NFL in part because Brady obstructed the investigation which tainted the findings.

You believe what? What did the NFL ever prove, Phallics? They ended up giving up trying to prove Brady had anything to do with deflating balls illegally. They were basing their suspension solely on his destroying his cell phone.
So you agree Brady destroyed evidence

I agree that he destroyed his cell phone. That there was ever "evidence" contained on that phone is total speculation on your and the NFL's part. Tom Brady has a right to privacy just as you and I do. He didn't give up that right when he joined the NFL despite what Roger Goodell mistakenly thinks.

Oldstyle: "That there was ever "evidence" contained on that phone is total speculation on your and the NFL's part." If he played for any other team than the Patriots your position would be much different.

No, actually my position would remain the same. I don't care for Rex Ryan but if the NFL tried to do to him what it attempted to do to Tom Brady then I would defend Rex Ryan in exactly the same way!
 
According to the standard agreed to in the CBA I believe the NFL in part because Brady obstructed the investigation which tainted the findings.

You believe what? What did the NFL ever prove, Phallics? They ended up giving up trying to prove Brady had anything to do with deflating balls illegally. They were basing their suspension solely on his destroying his cell phone.
So you agree Brady destroyed evidence

I agree that he destroyed his cell phone. That there was ever "evidence" contained on that phone is total speculation on your and the NFL's part. Tom Brady has a right to privacy just as you and I do. He didn't give up that right when he joined the NFL despite what Roger Goodell mistakenly thinks.

Oldstyle: "That there was ever "evidence" contained on that phone is total speculation on your and the NFL's part." If he played for any other team than the Patriots your position would be much different.

No, actually my position would remain the same. I don't care for Rex Ryan but if the NFL tried to do to him what it attempted to do to Tom Brady then I would defend Rex Ryan in exactly the same way!
Of course you would I see how you are going after the Colts because they did not get the punishment you think they deserved.
 
Haters gotta hate, Chris! It seems to be all that Phallics knows how to do.
 
You believe what? What did the NFL ever prove, Phallics? They ended up giving up trying to prove Brady had anything to do with deflating balls illegally. They were basing their suspension solely on his destroying his cell phone.
So you agree Brady destroyed evidence

I agree that he destroyed his cell phone. That there was ever "evidence" contained on that phone is total speculation on your and the NFL's part. Tom Brady has a right to privacy just as you and I do. He didn't give up that right when he joined the NFL despite what Roger Goodell mistakenly thinks.

Oldstyle: "That there was ever "evidence" contained on that phone is total speculation on your and the NFL's part." If he played for any other team than the Patriots your position would be much different.

No, actually my position would remain the same. I don't care for Rex Ryan but if the NFL tried to do to him what it attempted to do to Tom Brady then I would defend Rex Ryan in exactly the same way!
Of course you would I see how you are going after the Colts because they did not get the punishment you think they deserved.

OK...since the Colts were piping in artificial crowd noise during games while their opponents were on offense...what do YOU think they deserved? Clear cut violation of the rules. Clear cut attempt to gain an unfair advantage. What should the Colts have received for doing what they did?
 
So you agree Brady destroyed evidence

I agree that he destroyed his cell phone. That there was ever "evidence" contained on that phone is total speculation on your and the NFL's part. Tom Brady has a right to privacy just as you and I do. He didn't give up that right when he joined the NFL despite what Roger Goodell mistakenly thinks.

Oldstyle: "That there was ever "evidence" contained on that phone is total speculation on your and the NFL's part." If he played for any other team than the Patriots your position would be much different.

No, actually my position would remain the same. I don't care for Rex Ryan but if the NFL tried to do to him what it attempted to do to Tom Brady then I would defend Rex Ryan in exactly the same way!
Of course you would I see how you are going after the Colts because they did not get the punishment you think they deserved.

OK...since the Colts were piping in artificial crowd noise during games while their opponents were on offense...what do YOU think they deserved? Clear cut violation of the rules. Clear cut attempt to gain an unfair advantage. What should the Colts have received for doing what they did?
Beats me what do you think they should have gotten?
 
And since the Colts have shown themselves to be quite capable of breaking the rules to gain an advantage over an opponent...don't you think THEY warranted a look see during the Wells investigation to see if perhaps it was THEY who let air out of the one ball that was substantially under inflated?
 
And since the Colts have shown themselves to be quite capable of breaking the rules to gain an advantage over an opponent...don't you think THEY warranted a look see during the Wells investigation to see if perhaps it was THEY who let air out of the one ball that was substantially under inflated?
You need to get control over yourself. I already told you I do not know.
 
15th post
Beats you? That's your answer? Well since it gave them a huge advantage over the teams they played and it might have been going on for years...one would think it would be worth a million dollar fine, the loss of draft picks and their best defender suspended for 25% of the season! That was what the Patriots got for an "alleged" violation that the NFL never proved! Fair is fair...
 
But you DO know that the Patriots deserve what the NFL was trying to give them...even though the allegations were never proven? Really, Phallics?
 
And then you wonder why Judge Berman threw out the Brady suspension?
 
Beats you? That's your answer? Well since it gave them a huge advantage over the teams they played and it might have been going on for years...one would think it would be worth a million dollar fine, the loss of draft picks and their best defender suspended for 25% of the season! That was what the Patriots got for an "alleged" violation that the NFL never proved! Fair is fair...
Wait a sec you claim the Pats received little if any advantage with the spying but now you claim there was a great advantage with the noise. How do you know that?
 
Last edited:

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom