Don’t Know The Election Was By Theft?

[PoliticalChic]

8. “The confederacy against Trump gives rise to another reality: The only way to protect the probe into the Biden family money-grubbing is through the appointment of a special counsel. The need for protection was the logic behind the Mueller appointment, and it applies now in spades.

Not only must the probe be protected from Joe Biden’s White House but also from FBI Director Christopher Wray. Biden indicated he wants Wray to stay on, so the lackluster chief starts with an enormous conflict of interest, as will the eventual attorney general.

In fact, the special counsel provision is to be used when there are conflicts of interest among investigators and prosecutors. This case fits the definition in every possible way.”
Time to call in a special counsel on Hunter and Joe Biden: Goodwin





9. Interesting that when Biden was VP, he and his son Hunter went to deal with China, and Hunter came away with $billions.....

"The troubling reason why Biden is so soft on China
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, Hunter Biden’s firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government’s Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president."
The troubling reason why Biden is so soft on China


Sounds a lot like the $145 million Putin gave the Clintons.

 

[meaner gene]

Re-post sans the childish vulgarity.....if you wish a response.....unless you are afraid of the response.

You're a spam troll. You've been reposting the same voluminous disproven posts over and aver again. I don't think i've seen an original post from you in years.

Here's a clue. Don't post 27 pre-prepared paragraphs, and tell people to disprove each paragraph.

Post one paragraph and we'll gladly prove it false.

 

[meaner gene]

After all, proving election fraud requires evidence. Proof of no election fraud is actually easy. The DOJ, FBI, Barr and Wray have been looking for it.
Over 50 court cases, and election recounts, have been trying to prove fraud.

And the bottom line is, if there was fraud, one of those venues would have proved it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Now......which of these parts of the Democrat Party's agenda brought in that 'landslide.'?
explanation.

The same that brought Trump to office in 2016. Republicans universally said they voted for Trump to keep Hillary out of the white house.

Well. Now the people spoke, that we needed to clean out the white house.

That's false.

We on the Right vote for policies, not personalities.....that's why we never called the candidate god, Jesus or the messiah.


The glaring error you anti-Trumpers make is assuming that folks voted for the man.



Here's a dozen reasons:


Most voted against the Democrats,
against the mess Hussein Obama made of the economy,
against the corruption we've witnessed for decades,
against awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages,
against the anti-white bias of the Democrat Party,

against the flood of illegal immigrants who require welfare
against bringing millions of unvetted Muslim refugees from war-indoctrinated nations,
against redistribution of wealth,
against the failed Liberal welfare industry,
against being dictated to by the United Nothings,
against a failed Liberal education industry,


...and for the slim possibility of a rebirth of America.



"When secular leftists express frustration at how practicing Catholics (your humble servants) and evangelicals could ever vote for Donald Trump, the first thing they refuse to concede is the horror of the alternative.

They refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton clearly, forthrightly stood for abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason and even supported it having it funded by pro-life taxpayers. It’s what she and her husband called “safe, legal and rare.” Hillary and her crew even dismissed the videotaped baby-organ-selling grotesqueries of Planned Parenthood as somehow fictional. And they refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton represented the creeping extremism of the LGBT movement, with its emphasis on redesigning all the nation’s bathrooms, not to mention human nature."
Bozell & Graham Column: The Book Against Transgender Extremism


“Job growth surges by 312,000 in December” Job growth surges by 312,000 in December


"Unemployment hits 49-year low as US employers step up hiring"
Unemployment hits 49-year low as US employers step up hiring


"The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. "
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports®


"Hispanic Unemployment Rate Sets New Record Low in April"
Hispanic Unemployment Rate Sets New Record Low in April

"Unemployment Rate for Women Falls to Lowest Since 1953"
Unemployment Rate for Women Falls to Lowest Since 1953 | Breitbart

"Lowest unemployment in 19 years for workers without bachelor's degrees in April"
Lowest unemployment in 19 years for workers without bachelor's degrees in April


“Black unemployment rate falls to 5.9%, ties record low hit earlier this year”

Black unemployment rate falls to 5.9%, ties record low hit earlier this year

The employment picture for black Americans is better than it ever has been, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistic.

www.cnbc.com

Now watch me wipe the floor with you: list the Biden policies you voted for.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Re-post sans the childish vulgarity.....if you wish a response.....unless you are afraid of the response.

You're a spam troll. You've been reposting the same voluminous disproven posts over and aver again. I don't think i've seen an original post from you in years.

Here's a clue. Don't post 27 pre-prepared paragraphs, and tell people to disprove each paragraph.

Post one paragraph and we'll gladly prove it false.

"....disproven posts..."

Soooo......why can't you name any such?

 

[Uncensored2008]

How many more days will the crying continue..?

How long will it take the democrats to set up the death camps and round up the patriots?

 

[PoliticalChic]

After all, proving election fraud requires evidence. Proof of no election fraud is actually easy. The DOJ, FBI, Barr and Wray have been looking for it.
Over 50 court cases, and election recounts, have been trying to prove fraud.

And the bottom line is, if there was fraud, one of those venues would have proved it.

"..., proving election fraud requires evidence. "


Done.



What is sworn evidence?

A very common question that many laypeople have is whether an affidavit can be presented in court as evidence in a trial. Yes, affidavits are sworn, notarized statements and that gives at least an appearance of being truthful. And, getting a witness to come to court testify may be an imposition on that witness.Nov 10, 2014
Common legal question: Can I present an affidavit as ...




“Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

CAMPAIGN 2020

Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

Extremely suspicious.



Published

7 hours ago

on

Nov 22, 2020

By

Richard Moorhead

Top of Form​

A Fulton County, Georgia woman is describing handling a “pristine” batch of ballots that were marked “98%” of the time for Joe Biden in election recount duties, describing the suspicious phenomenon in a sworn affidavit.

Susan Voyles identifies herself as a participant in Georgia’s post-election recount in the affidavit, filed in litigation against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger by Trump campaign attorney Lin Wood.

Voyles describes seeing ballots that differed considerably from the other ballots she was entrusted to count in the remix.

Voyles describes the batch of ballots as unusual in their texture and level of handling, and that she estimates 98% of them were cast for Joe Biden. Voyles even speculates that these ballots could’ve been processed through a ballot-marking device!



Voyles earlier described election recount supervisors as tasking them to process ballots in a “selective” fashion. Boxes of absentee ballots were signed by no one, without markings one might expect the Georgia Secretary of State to outfit absentee ballots with.

Another witness describes viewing election workers count 500 straight ballots for Joe Biden, all of which were marked with perfect black bubbles.”

Georgia Recount Worker Describes "Pristine" Batch of Ballots - 98% for Joe Biden! - Big League Politics

Extremely suspicious.

bigleaguepolitics.com

 

[meaner gene]

The same that brought Trump to office in 2016. Republicans universally said they voted for Trump to keep Hillary out of the white house.

Well. Now the people spoke, that we needed to clean out the white house.

That's false.

For many voters, it’s not which presidential candidate they’re for but which they’re against

A significant share of both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump supporters say their vote is based more on which candidate they are against rather than which one they are for.

www.pewresearch.org

For many voters, it’s not which presidential candidate they’re for but which they’re against

But another dynamic in the 2016 presidential election is the significant share of voters who say their vote is based more on which candidate they are against rather than which one they are for.

 

[PoliticalChic]

How many more days will the crying continue..?

How long will it take the democrats to set up the death camps and round up the patriots?

Wouldn't be the first time.

Only one President, a Democrat, actually did that.....put American citizens in concentration camps.


Gives 'em precedent.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The same that brought Trump to office in 2016. Republicans universally said they voted for Trump to keep Hillary out of the white house.

Well. Now the people spoke, that we needed to clean out the white house.

That's false.

For many voters, it’s not which presidential candidate they’re for but which they’re against

A significant share of both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump supporters say their vote is based more on which candidate they are against rather than which one they are for.

www.pewresearch.org

For many voters, it’s not which presidential candidate they’re for but which they’re against

But another dynamic in the 2016 presidential election is the significant share of voters who say their vote is based more on which candidate they are against rather than which one they are for.

I just provided a list of policies for Trump.

You can't do the same for Biden, or against Trump.

Indicates you are nothing more than a trained seal. Did they at least provide a fish for your vote????

 

[meaner gene]

Only one President, a Democrat, actually did that.....put American citizens in concentration camps.


Gives 'em precedent.

Only one President, a Republican, actually started a civil war.

Given 'em precedent.

Trump's goal is fighting the election with phony election fraud, to ignite a civil war.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Really????

View attachment 429410



1.They know. Every one of the liars….er, Democrats, are totally aware.

Even if they try to hide the truth from themselves, the charade is destroyed once they are asked to give some examples of Trump policies that they voted against. Or new policies from Biden that they voted for. You’ll get the same response you’d get if you asked them to name the books they’ve read that informed their geopolitical views.

These are neither smart, nor honest, people.



2. Seen accurately, this election is reminiscent of the public discussion that took place back in 1970 when Nixon nominated Court of Appeals Judge G. Harrold Carswell of Florida to the United States Supreme Court, and there was an outcry that Carswell was not much of a jurist, and certainly not of the caliber required for the nation’s highest tribunal.

Speaking during March 1970 in favor of a U.S. Supreme Court nominee, Senator Roman L. Hruska of Nebraska said:

“So what if he is mediocre? There are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren't they? We can't have all Brandeises, Cardozos, and Frankfurters and stuff like that there.”
I suppose, by the same token, we can't have lots of Reagans and Trumps.

Shockingly, the speech failed to persuade Senator Hruska's colleagues, and the nominee withdrew.

What an excellent description of Quid Pro Joe…..except that at least Carswell hadn’t sold his services to a foreign enemy, too.




3. Essayist Michael Goodwin dips a toe in the discussion with an excellent literary allusion.

“A Fox News poll finds that 36 percent of all voters believe the election was stolen from Trump, with nearly seven out of 10 Republicans sharing that view. But if the election was stolen, who stole it?

For my money, the best analogy is Agatha Christie’s “Murder on the Orient Express.” Everybody had a motive, and everybody plunged the knife.
Democrats clearly wanted to erase the states’ guardrails on ballot integrity, and they did, sometimes with GOP assistance or indifference.

Then there’s Big Tech, whose censors always lean in one direction. Their political donations and news blackouts are two sides of the same agenda.

The Deep State was a zealous backstabber. More than 50 former intelligence officials, many of whom probably wanted jobs in a Biden administration, signed a letter suggesting the Post reports on Hunter Biden smacked of Russian disinformation. The signers included former CIA chiefs John Brennan, Gen. Michael Hayden, Leon Panetta and Michael Morell, all of whom turned out to be wrong. Some spooks they are.” Time to call in a special counsel on Hunter and Joe Biden: Goodwin



An amazingly large and diverse line-up arraigned against the American people.

And they were more willing to work at it.

The thread premise is a lie.

"The thread premise is a lie. "

Really?

Let's check, C_Chamber_Pot



“Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

CAMPAIGN 2020

Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

Extremely suspicious.



Published

7 hours ago

on

Nov 22, 2020

By

Richard Moorhead

Top of Form​

A Fulton County, Georgia woman is describing handling a “pristine” batch of ballots that were marked “98%” of the time for Joe Biden in election recount duties, describing the suspicious phenomenon in a sworn affidavit.

Susan Voyles identifies herself as a participant in Georgia’s post-election recount in the affidavit, filed in litigation against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger by Trump campaign attorney Lin Wood.

Voyles describes seeing ballots that differed considerably from the other ballots she was entrusted to count in the remix.

Voyles describes the batch of ballots as unusual in their texture and level of handling, and that she estimates 98% of them were cast for Joe Biden. Voyles even speculates that these ballots could’ve been processed through a ballot-marking device!



Voyles earlier described election recount supervisors as tasking them to process ballots in a “selective” fashion. Boxes of absentee ballots were signed by no one, without markings one might expect the Georgia Secretary of State to outfit absentee ballots with.

Another witness describes viewing election workers count 500 straight ballots for Joe Biden, all of which were marked with perfect black bubbles.”

Georgia Recount Worker Describes "Pristine" Batch of Ballots - 98% for Joe Biden! - Big League Politics

Extremely suspicious.

bigleaguepolitics.com

=========================================================
Did everyone see this whistle blower who saw the machinations in Democrat Detroit?



Ballots altered, Republican poll watchers kept out....











This lady was an IT employee of Dominion voting machines.

When she saw what was going on, she notified her boss, who didn't want to hear it.





Sworn affidavits are considered as evidence.



"Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged
Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center
By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle
on 5th November 2020 @ 7.00pm



© press
The widows were covered in opaque cardboard by election officials
Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of the ballot counting room, blocking poll watchers from witnessing the vote count."

​

Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged

Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center - Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of... | NEON NETTLE

neonnettle.com

there is no amount of evidence that can sway democrat cultists

 

[meaner gene]

I just provided a list of policies for Trump.

And I posted the Pew Research poll that in 2016 people voted against Hillary, and against Trump instead of for them.

Republicans posted they were happy with Trump even though he didn't build his wall, he didn't repeal and replace obamacare, or even in the beginning enacted his muslim ban. They universally said, Trump was a success just by keeping Hillary out of the white house.

Prove me wrong, but you can't. I have the posts to prove it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

After all, proving election fraud requires evidence. Proof of no election fraud is actually easy. The DOJ, FBI, Barr and Wray have been looking for it.
Over 50 court cases, and election recounts, have been trying to prove fraud.

And the bottom line is, if there was fraud, one of those venues would have proved it.

The progression that proves the premise:

No evidence of voter fraud!
No evidence of widespread voter fraud!
Not enough evidence of widespread voter fraud!
Not enough evidence of widespread voter fraud has been proven!
Not enough evidence of widespread voter fraud has been proven that would change or alter the election!

It's pretty much their admission that they stole the election from the man who actually won it, and gave it to the bought and paid for servant of Communist China.


But they might have this much in their argument: not widespread......but targeted voter fraud- in the swing states.

 

[meaner gene]

After all, proving election fraud requires evidence.

The progression that proves the premise:

No evidence of voter fraud!
No evidence of widespread voter fraud!

So we agree.

That's a start.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Only one President, a Democrat, actually did that.....put American citizens in concentration camps.


Gives 'em precedent.

Only one President, a Republican, actually started a civil war.

Given 'em precedent.

Trump's goal is fighting the election with phony election fraud, to ignite a civil war.

False.

And it has been so eminently easy to prove your every post false......I hope you keep posting and embarrassing the Democrats/Leftists.


Watch this:

Democrat Jefferson Davis started the Civil War.

1. Major Robert Anderson and 85 men were stranded in Fort Sumter.

2. Surrounding him were hundreds of militiamen and coastal guns.

3. Lincoln refused to give the fort up, but the fort was running out of food: if he sent a supply convoy into Charleston Bay, he would be blamed for starting the war.....but how could he give in, and give up the fort?

4. William Seward tried to undermine Lincoln....telling Lincoln to give up the fort for 'goodwill.'

5. On April 5, Lincoln dispatched a fleet of supply ships with the proviso that was relayed to Jefferson Davis: the vessels would be unarmed, with the only cargo "food for hungry men."

6. Firing on the defenseless ships would have been an act of war by the Confederacy.

7. On Tuesday, April 9, Davis held a cabinet meeting, deciding on war. Three days later, and hours before the ships would arrive....the Southern forces attacked the fort.
Gavin Mortimer
"Double Death: The True Story of Pryce Lewis, the Civil War's Most Daring Spy,"byGavin Mortimer, p.70-71
The First Battle of Fort Sumter opened on April 12, 1861, when Confederate artillery fired on the Union garrisonhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Sumter


You're quite a moron.......keep posting!

 

[PoliticalChic]

After all, proving election fraud requires evidence.

The progression that proves the premise:

No evidence of voter fraud!
No evidence of widespread voter fraud!

So we agree.

That's a start.

I never said that.

Don't alter my posts.

 

[meaner gene]

Watch this:

Democrat Jefferson Davis started the Civil War.

Sorry, republicans call the civil war "the war of northern agression"

Also in the 20th century, the term "War of Northern Aggression" developed under the Lost Cause of the Confederacy movement by Southern history revisionists, with attempts to reimagine the American Civil War narrative negatively and to preserve Confederate legacy.

The same folks still flying the flag.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Watch this:

Democrat Jefferson Davis started the Civil War.

Sorry, republicans call the civil war "the war of northern agression"

Also in the 20th century, the term "War of Northern Aggression" developed under the Lost Cause of the Confederacy movement by Southern history revisionists, with attempts to reimagine the American Civil War narrative negatively and to preserve Confederate legacy.

The same folks still flying the flag.

View attachment 429621

I provide the facts, and prove my point, and some government school grad who majored in summer school, posts the usual "Is not, isssssssssss noooottttttt!!!!"


I believe readers will recognize what you are.

 

[meaner gene]

I never said that.

Don't alter my posts.

Here's the linked post of you posting what you claim you didn't post.

The progression that proves the premise:

No evidence of voter fraud!
No evidence of widespread voter fraud!