Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
Every study published has disclosures. Doesn’t mean no science is valid,Disclosures exist for that very reason. The material is BIASED, no way around that.
Certainly doesn’t mean you know more than the researchers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Every study published has disclosures. Doesn’t mean no science is valid,Disclosures exist for that very reason. The material is BIASED, no way around that.
OK I guess I'm not understanding. If they are fully capable of discharging their duties in the military, what is the problem? Just that you don't like it?It is a hindrance to others serving or thinking about serving.
Normal people DONT WANT TO SERVE WITH THEM. Military is not a 9 to 5 job
You go serve with them. Sleep in foxholes with them. Live in same berthings with them.OK I guess I'm not understanding. If they are fully capable of discharging their duties in the military, what is the problem? Just that you don't like it?
Please explain it to me.
I heard it was section 8, brah. Ofc that was on M.A.S.H., but that may very well be it.Post the regulation that they are violating. Again you typing nonsense on the interwebs doesnt count as evidence.
LOL , I never said I know more than researchers ,I simply implied that in order to reach their conclusions they were biased. Scientific studies that are biased aren't worth the paper they are written on.Every study published has disclosures. Doesn’t mean no science is valid,
Certainly doesn’t mean you know more than the researchers.
If they are fully capable of discharging their duties in the military
You go serve with them. Sleep in foxholes with them. Live in same berthings with them.
Normal people dont want to serve if they have to live with these mentally ill people.
I never heard of a transgender attacking a fellow military member but I'm certain the reverse is true. Hatred and bigotry are taught. It is not impossible to overcome. Get help.You go serve with them. Sleep in foxholes with them. Live in same berthings with them.
Normal people dont want to serve if they have to live with these mentally ill people.
If one is unable to be deployed, then they are clearly incapable of discharging their duties.
You want to live with them. Go ahead.Again, that all goes with, if they are FULLY CAPABLE of doing their duty, then how is their service different than anyone else's?
if a trans person is willing to put their life on the line to defend your freedom, are you really going to worry about their lifestyle?
And they are deployable yes so I guess your argument is mute.If one is unable to be deployed, then they are clearly incapable of discharging their duties.
Thank you for not serving.You want to live with them. Go ahead.
This is why many are not joining now. No one wants to serve wirh them.
You have no evidence of bias that would not also apply to every other single study published. You’re just being stubborn you don’t want to admit that you’re wrong.LOL , I never said I know more than researchers ,I simply implied that in order to reach their conclusions they were biased. Scientific studies that are biased aren't worth the paper they are written on.
And they are deployable yes so I guess your argument is mute.
Operation Tranny Shield! Always at the front lines!And they are deployable yes so I guess your argument is mute.
Stann learn from people who no more than you, rather than your childish "thumbs down."No, actually they are not. Because they require hormone treatments for the rest of their lives. Therefore are considered to have a terminal medical condition and can not be deployed.
This is similar to why I was no longer deployable my last several years in. I use a CPAP for severe sleep apnea, so was deemed undeployable.
Once again, this is the difference between somebody that actually knows and understands the military, and somebody like you who is simply making it all up as you go along.
Oh, and I am still waiting on the military regulation about "medical leave" which states that if you take too much you can be discharged.
You want to live with them. Go ahead.
This is why many are not joining now. No one wants to serve wirh them.
Some civilian jobs have a specified length. Most are permanent.I didn't ask him if he was in the military. He simply worked at the base , that's possible. Do civilians also sign up for certain timelines of service ?
He's a civilian employee, then.That's how he refered to it. He has accrued 3 months of sick leave.
What is the problem ? The thumbs up symbol is there for people you agree with , the thumps down is there for people you disagree with. What do you think it means ? I simple disagree with either or both the context of what is said / implied . You shouldn't feel.theatened by that.your childish "thumbs down."
You are wrong. There is no such system in place for active-duty military. Your suppositions do not reflect reality.Since the military can discharge an enlisted man for excessive use of medical leave there must be a system in place that accrues the amount of time available for each soldier. An accrual system. Wether it is offered as such I am not privy to that information. I was never sick the entire time ( short ) I was in. That's why I thought it was interesting.