Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 98,397
- 3,635
Who knows what your point is with that? The closer to the election, the more accurate the polling in terms if who actually wins. Here's a poll from just a few weeks before that election...

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who has done better?So? He beat the next closest candidate by 30 points. Others have done better. So no, not a record.
Ha haSo youre saying that only Trump voters were motivated enough to brave the arctic weather temps? That looks like a great sign for Trump.![]()
As you don't acknowledge is the fact that the Rasmussen poll nailed the results. They traditionally are one of the two or three most accurate pollsters.Who knows what your point is with that? The closer to the election, the more accurate the polling in terms if who actually wins. Here's a poll from just a few weeks before that election...
![]()
Trump wasn't a former President in 2016.In 2016 he got 24.3% in Iowa.
![]()
Who Won the Republican Iowa Caucuses in 2016?
While Donald Trump cruised to the Republican presidential nomination in 2016 on his path to winning the presidency, he started off in the losing column. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, his fiercest competitor, [won the crowded Iowa contest](https://wsj.com/articles/cruz-edges-trump-in-iowas-gop-race-1454384533www.wsj.com
So he has more than doubled this time.
I know you're desperate to show what a contrarian you and desperate to hate trump, even if it is irrational, but at least have some ideas what you're talking about once in a while.
What evidence do you have he wouldn’t get over half of all those voters, Dagoober?If only 14% of the Dems show up to vote, you‘d have a right to crow. Now you’re all happy because only 14 % of the entire party showed up…..and he only got half of them. That’s cause for a funeral.
Where and how did you drudge up that hairy factoid.The fact that Trump can only get 51% of the vote within his own party in Iowa shows that he CANNOT win in November.
The fact that Republicans are split like this when voting for their former President does not bode well at all for Trump in November.
This time our man was better prepared and more organizedTrump "only" got 24% in the 2016 Iowa caucus
LOL...only "strong" in your mind. They are all spineless MAGA lite imbeciles.Where and how did you drudge up that hairy factoid.
It only proved how strong a field the GOP has.
2016 simply doesn't matter. Trump was not an incumbent President in 2016.But then in 2015-2016 the Field was like 4 times bigger.
As many as 17 Presidential candidates in 2015.
Which proved how strong a candidate Trump was
Then and Now.
The bottom line is so belligerently Obvious.
Trump is Never { In some kind of Never Never Land }
ever gonna receive a fair shake.It's like Democrats forgot that
shaking hands is what defines a winner.And Trump does not like
shaking hands.{ He's a Phobia person }.But he'll do it in order to
Take Back America.LIke the way he went to Walter Reed for his
Covid shot and recovery and within a week couldn't sit still
in some Hospital room w/o going out to wave to his flock.
That's the kinda guy Trump is.
Again ... Trump ousted Bob Dole's 12 point { record }
victory over Pat Robertson by a whopping 20 points.
Once again you expose the fact you have ZERO reading comprehension skills, Simp.LOLOL
Here's what YOU posted, Dumbfuck...
Record win.
Except it's not a record win. So now you rightards are adding asterisks to make it so.
![]()
Given the horrendous, false attacks on President Trump by the legacy media, his showing is nothing short of miraculous! Unless you lie to yourself, even you must acknowledge his remarkable showing.Trump wasn't a former President in 2016.
Trump is so weak that he can barely muster a majority in HIS OWN PARTY after serving as president for 4 years.
That is miserably bad.
Once again you expose the fact you have ZERO reading comprehension skills, Simp.Nope, it wasn't a record. A record means he won the Iowa caucus over the next closest candidate by the biggest margin ever. A d that simply not true, Dumbfuck.
Lies.It's not a record without these idiots adding asterisks.
More lies.So? He beat the next closest candidate by 30 points. Others have done better. So no, not a record.
Even more lies.Thanks for unwitingly admitting none of the articles you posted said anything about that.
![]()
Biden only won 15.8% in Iowa losing against Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg. What's that say about your prediction?The fact that Trump can only get 51% of the vote within his own party in Iowa shows that he CANNOT win in November.
The fact that Republicans are split like this when voting for their former President does not bode well at all for Trump in November.
HILLARY IN AN ELECTORAL LANDSLIDE- 2 weeks before the election.Who knows what your point is with that? The closer to the election, the more accurate the polling in terms if who actually wins. Here's a poll from just a few weeks before that election...
![]()
There is nothing "remarkable" about it. As a former President, Trump should be getting at least 80% of the vote among Republican voters.Given the horrendous, false attacks on President Trump by the legacy media, his showing is nothing short of miraculous! Unless you lie to yourself, even you must acknowledge his remarkable showing.