Don t Let Anybody Tell You That Businesses Create Jobs

The difference is Jobs made one that sells. That still doesn't prove that Apple employees are smart enough, perseverent enough and bold enough to launch a product like the iPad.

Jobs didn't make anything. It was already made. He directed his employees to make it into a more consumer friendly package with newer technology.

Speaking of rip-off's; Did you know that the Motorola Flip-Phone was designed by a prop guy working on your favorite show, Star Trek?
 
"Employees make all the money for an employer."

You're a ******* retard.

I'll tell you what, I will give you a pound of silicone, a basket of diodes and resisters, and soldering iron. In 10,000 years, you could not produce a single iPhone.

Every Communist in history has claimed that muscle builds everything - yet not a one of you can create shit.

If you employ, why would you make any of the money?

We've been through this before moron;

It is the mind of the person who creates the process and product that makes the money. It was Jack Kilby, who on his own time while employed by Texas Instruments, created the integrated circuit and changed the world - though you lie about this despite being corrected.

The assembler on the plant floor could never invent the IC. YOU tell the Communist that the laborer creates, but it was Kilby alone who created, then trained labor to assembly his creation.

Labor can be trained to replicate a task that an inventor or engineer developed - labor cannot create.

You lied about the microcomputer as well - created by Intel, a private company. Again, despite your lies, Robert Noyce created the 4004 in private industry, for a Japanese calculator company.

A platform is a place (actual or virtual) and rules and direction. Everything else is day-to-day operation which is (should be) employee controlled.

An employer DOES collect the money. It goes into his/her account.

Does an employee receive compensation? Yes

Does an employee receive a percentage? Commission employees do. Employee owned corporations do (kinda of).

Anything else?

An laborer is paid for labor - they do not create anything, they merely perform tasks as they are trained and instructed.
 
If someone is owed $100.00 and gives the person that owes an aid of $50.00 wouldn't that be unrealized monies to the person owed the monies?

Because you are a looter, you view a legal deduction as welshing on the amount owed. You hold that all capital is the rightful property of the state, as are the subjects.
 
The difference is Jobs made one that sells. That still doesn't prove that Apple employees are smart enough, perseverent enough and bold enough to launch a product like the iPad.

Jobs licensed the technology from Microsoft. Even today, Microsoft gains a larger profit on every iPhone sold than Apple does.

This doesn't mean that menial labor created anything, just that Microsoft invents, Apple markets. Apple lacks the technical expertise of Microsoft, Microsoft lacks the marketing acumen of Apple. Through combined resources, both are making money hand over fist.
 
Jobs didn't make anything. It was already made. He directed his employees to make it into a more consumer friendly package with newer technology.

Speaking of rip-off's; Did you know that the Motorola Flip-Phone was designed by a prop guy working on your favorite show, Star Trek?

You are a ******* idiot.

Jobs took raw technology and transformed it into something that people around the globe wanted. No one had any idea they wanted such a device before Jobs brought it to them, but once the supply was there, it created a demand that was nearly universal.

You spew nonsense because you are a looter and need to defend your mooching. But those who produce are not fooled by those like you.

You offer your need to others, men like Steve Jobs offered goods.
 
"Employees make all the money for an employer."

You're a ******* retard.

I'll tell you what, I will give you a pound of silicone, a basket of diodes and resisters, and soldering iron. In 10,000 years, you could not produce a single iPhone.

Every Communist in history has claimed that muscle builds everything - yet not a one of you can create shit.

If you employ, why would you make any of the money?

We've been through this before moron;

It is the mind of the person who creates the process and product that makes the money. It was Jack Kilby, who on his own time while employed by Texas Instruments, created the integrated circuit and changed the world - though you lie about this despite being corrected.

The assembler on the plant floor could never invent the IC. YOU tell the Communist that the laborer creates, but it was Kilby alone who created, then trained labor to assembly his creation.

Labor can be trained to replicate a task that an inventor or engineer developed - labor cannot create.

You lied about the microcomputer as well - created by Intel, a private company. Again, despite your lies, Robert Noyce created the 4004 in private industry, for a Japanese calculator company.

A platform is a place (actual or virtual) and rules and direction. Everything else is day-to-day operation which is (should be) employee controlled.

An employer DOES collect the money. It goes into his/her account.

Does an employee receive compensation? Yes

Does an employee receive a percentage? Commission employees do. Employee owned corporations do (kinda of).

Anything else?

An laborer is paid for labor - they do not create anything, they merely perform tasks as they are trained and instructed.

A laborer creates the end product for which the company makes all of their monies.
 
If someone is owed $100.00 and gives the person that owes an aid of $50.00 wouldn't that be unrealized monies to the person owed the monies?

Because you are a looter, you view a legal deduction as welshing on the amount owed. You hold that all capital is the rightful property of the state, as are the subjects.

I gave you a definition of unrealized monies. If you have a differing rebuttal then post it.
 
Jobs licensed the technology from Microsoft. Even today, Microsoft gains a larger profit on every iPhone sold than Apple does.

This doesn't mean that menial labor created anything, just that Microsoft invents, Apple markets. Apple lacks the technical expertise of Microsoft, Microsoft lacks the marketing acumen of Apple. Through combined resources, both are making money hand over fist.

'Apple lacks the technical expertise of Microsoft', care to elaborate on that? Or can you?
 
Jobs didn't make anything. It was already made. He directed his employees to make it into a more consumer friendly package with newer technology.

Speaking of rip-off's; Did you know that the Motorola Flip-Phone was designed by a prop guy working on your favorite show, Star Trek?

You are a ******* idiot.

Jobs took raw technology and transformed it into something that people around the globe wanted. No one had any idea they wanted such a device before Jobs brought it to them, but once the supply was there, it created a demand that was nearly universal.

You spew nonsense because you are a looter and need to defend your mooching. But those who produce are not fooled by those like you.

You offer your need to others, men like Steve Jobs offered goods.

So Jobs (or his people) is a great marketer.
 
A laborer creates the end product for which the company makes all of their monies.

That is a lie Comrade, as you know. The laborer follows the instructions of his supervisor. Often the laborer has no idea at all what it is he is producing, how the button he pushes to start a machine making a widget goes into the final product. And it doesn't matter, they are just unskilled labor, easily replaced and of no real consequence to the process or the product.
 
15th post
2u8dmgy.jpg
 
I gave you a definition of unrealized monies. If you have a differing rebuttal then post it.

You gave a definition that is irrelevant to a legal deduction in taxes.

Epic fail, as always.

Serious question, have you ever held a job? Have you ever in your life, performed a task that another person would willingly pay you for?

Or is looting the extent of your life?
 
Getting back.....Hillary Clinton is 100% correct.

Hillary Clinton is a ******* moron, and sealed the fact that she will never hold the presidency with her moronic boast.

She's 100% correct.

Is she still 100% correct when she takes it back then?

http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/27/politics/hillary-clinton-job-creation/index.html

Let me be absolutely clear about what I've been saying for a couple of decades: Our economy grows when businesses and entrepreneurs create good-paying jobs here in an America where workers and families are empowered to build from the bottom up and the middle out -- not when we hand out tax breaks for corporations that outsource jobs or stash their profits overseas.

So is it businesses and entrepreneurs that create jobs or is it not?
 
Back
Top Bottom