ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 52,553
- 52,704
- 3,615
Now that Progs really don't give a shit about Hillary, I wonder how far they will go to defend her corruption.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
DOJ ReOpens Hillary Email Scandal Based on FBI Evidence
- Thread starter easyt65
- Start date
Rexx Taylor
Platinum Member
- Banned
- #22
i wonder how many emails you can fit into two standard size cath bagsNow that Progs really don't give a shit about Hillary, I wonder how far they will go to defend her corruption.
Rexx Taylor
Platinum Member
- Banned
- #23
I aint no wayyys Tarrred! Just take a look at my house! ITS ON FARRRRR!Now that Progs really don't give a shit about Hillary, I wonder how far they will go to defend her corruption.
ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 52,553
- 52,704
- 3,615
Done, Done on to the next one.
Dems never gave 2 squirts of piss about Hillary...they just wanted power.
They look like hypocritical douches, but that's because they are.
Dems never gave 2 squirts of piss about Hillary...they just wanted power.
They look like hypocritical douches, but that's because they are.
If Hillary had won I believe she would have achieved the pinnacle of success and spent all her time swilling vodka and laying in her own piss.Done, Done on to the next one.
Dems never gave 2 squirts of piss about Hillary...they just wanted power.
They look like hypocritical douches, but that's because they are.
ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 52,553
- 52,704
- 3,615
If Hillary had won I believe she would have achieved the pinnacle of success and spent all her time swilling vodka and laying in her own piss.Done, Done on to the next one.
Dems never gave 2 squirts of piss about Hillary...they just wanted power.
They look like hypocritical douches, but that's because they are.
...and the SWAMP would be DEEPER than ever.
easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,101
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #27
IG report on Clinton email case, document dump could hold new year bombshells
'For the last 12 months, the inspector general of the Department of Justice has been conducting a review of the FBI and DOJ’s actions related to the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of state.
A final report on the investigation is expected within several months. But in the coming days, the Department of Justice is also expected to provide Congress with “many, many more” records related to the review, according to the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.
So far, other documents already turned over to the committee have made a big splash.
The inspector general’s review uncovered the anti-Trump texts from FBI official Peter Strzok, who called Trump an “idiot” and texted about an “insurance policy” against a Trump presidency.
Strzok had been assigned to Robert Mueller’s special counsel probe, but has since been reassigned."
GUARANTEED MORE TO COME....
'For the last 12 months, the inspector general of the Department of Justice has been conducting a review of the FBI and DOJ’s actions related to the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of state.
A final report on the investigation is expected within several months. But in the coming days, the Department of Justice is also expected to provide Congress with “many, many more” records related to the review, according to the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.
So far, other documents already turned over to the committee have made a big splash.
The inspector general’s review uncovered the anti-Trump texts from FBI official Peter Strzok, who called Trump an “idiot” and texted about an “insurance policy” against a Trump presidency.
Strzok had been assigned to Robert Mueller’s special counsel probe, but has since been reassigned."
GUARANTEED MORE TO COME....
easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,101
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #28
The Hillary Clinton E-Mail Server Scandal is like a GIANT, SMELLY, CRIMINAL ONION - Every time you peel back another layer you find another rotten layer!
NEW UPDATE: NEW CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS FOUND ON HUMA ABEDIN'S / ANTHONY WEINER'S LAPTOP:
More Classified Emails Have Been Discovered on Weiner's Laptop
(*** Notice how the liberal media attempts to take the focus off of Huma Abedin - Hillary's aide, who sent copies of all of Hillary's CLASSIFIED e-mails / documents to HER un-approved, un-encrypted, un-secured, illegal laptop at home which she shared with her pedophile husband who is in jail right now?! Huma has already been protected from indictment by the criminal FBI for 'Lying to the FBI', and now it seems the media is trying to make it sound as if Anthony Weiner somehow had access to Hillary's e-mails and downloaded them onto the laptop, thereby protecting Huma again...)
"There have now been at least 18 classified emails discovered on Anthony Weiner’s laptop, Judicial Watch reports.
According to the conservative watchdog group, five previously unreleased emails were among a batch of 147 documents related to Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin, which the State Department released last week.
Chris Farrell, director of investigations and research for Judicial Watch, said there is no confusion over the sensitivity of the emails.
“They were classified when they were written. They were classified when they were transmitted and they were classified when they were residents on the Weiner laptop,”
HUMA ABEDIN SHOULD BE IN JAIL WITH HER HUSBAND RIGHT NOW!
Put the 'thumb screws' to her and make her 'roll over on' Hillary!
NEW UPDATE: NEW CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS FOUND ON HUMA ABEDIN'S / ANTHONY WEINER'S LAPTOP:
More Classified Emails Have Been Discovered on Weiner's Laptop
(*** Notice how the liberal media attempts to take the focus off of Huma Abedin - Hillary's aide, who sent copies of all of Hillary's CLASSIFIED e-mails / documents to HER un-approved, un-encrypted, un-secured, illegal laptop at home which she shared with her pedophile husband who is in jail right now?! Huma has already been protected from indictment by the criminal FBI for 'Lying to the FBI', and now it seems the media is trying to make it sound as if Anthony Weiner somehow had access to Hillary's e-mails and downloaded them onto the laptop, thereby protecting Huma again...)
"There have now been at least 18 classified emails discovered on Anthony Weiner’s laptop, Judicial Watch reports.
According to the conservative watchdog group, five previously unreleased emails were among a batch of 147 documents related to Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin, which the State Department released last week.
Chris Farrell, director of investigations and research for Judicial Watch, said there is no confusion over the sensitivity of the emails.
“They were classified when they were written. They were classified when they were transmitted and they were classified when they were residents on the Weiner laptop,”
HUMA ABEDIN SHOULD BE IN JAIL WITH HER HUSBAND RIGHT NOW!
Put the 'thumb screws' to her and make her 'roll over on' Hillary!
easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,101
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #29
UPDATE:
REVEALED: Multiple References to Potential Crimes Deleted From Early Drafts of Comey's Hillary Email Scandal Memo
"Everything that has happened in the Trump probe stands out against a backdrop of leniency in the Clinton investigation. While Mueller has prosecuted two Trump associates for lying to the FBI, the Obama Justice Department gave a pass to Mrs. Clinton and her subordinates, who gave the FBI misinformation about such key matters as whether Clinton understood markings in classified documents and whether her aides knew about her homebrew server system during their State Department service...The irregularities in the Clinton-emails investigation are breathtaking: the failure to use the grand jury to compel the production of key physical evidence; the Justice Department’s collaboration with defense lawyers to restrict the FBI’s ability to pursue obvious lines of inquiry and examine digital evidence; immunity grants to suspects who should have been charged with crimes and pressured to cooperate; allowing subjects of the investigation to be present for each other’s FBI interviews and even to act as lawyers for Clinton, in violation of legal and ethical rules; Comey’s preparation of a statement exonerating Clinton months before the investigation was complete and key witnesses — including Clinton herself — were interviewed; and the shameful tarmac meeting between Obama attorney general Loretta Lynch and Mrs. Clinton’s husband just days before Mrs. Clinton sat for a perfunctory FBI interview (after which Comey announced the decision not to charge her).
Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills both gave false statements to the FBI about their knowledge of the "homebrew" server. Rather than having the specter of prosecution hung over their heads, they were granted sweeping and generous immunity deals, under which they protected themselves and their boss. And they weren't the only ones:
A computer technician who deleted Clinton emails from her server in March 2015 after a congressional subpoena had been issued for them, originally lied to the FBI during his interviews, memos show. The witness’s name was redacted from documents released by the FBI but he was identified as an employee of a computer firm that helped maintained Clinton’s email server. His admission of false statements came one day after the Comey statement was already being drafted, investigators told The Hill. The computer employee originally told the FBI in a February 2016 interview that he did not recall making any deletions from Clinton’s server in March 2015, FBI records show. But then on May 3, 2016, the same employee in a subsequent FBI interview told agents he had an “oh shit moment” and in late March 2015 deleted Clinton’s email archive from the server, according to FBI documents reviewed by The Hill...the FBI decided not to pursue criminal charges against the witness, and instead gave the technician an immunity deal so he could correct his story, congressional investigators said.
This tech's name may have been redacted from the memos, but we've been aware of his "oh sh*t" moment for some time. Clinton's team started permanently eliminating evidence (which was under Congressional subpoena) after the New York Times publicly reported the existence of her private server. But unless I'm mistaken, this is the first we've heard about the "oh sh*t" guy having originally lied to the FBI about it. John Sexton notes the importance of the timeline here: "That line in bold is significant because it suggests that even as the FBI gained leverage against one of the minor players in the drama the higher-ups had already started writing Hillary’s exoneration." That does seem quite curious, doesn't it? And as Sexton writes, so does this:
Lawmakers on the House Judiciary Committee who attended a Dec. 21 closed-door briefing by FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe say the bureau official confirmed that the investigation and charging decisions were controlled by a small group in Washington headquarters rather the normal process of allowing field offices to investigate possible criminality in their localities. The Clinton email server in question was based in New York. In normal FBI cases, field offices where crimes are believed to have been committed investigate the evidence and then recommend to bureau hierarchy whether to pursue charges with prosecutors. In this case, the bureau hierarchy controlled both the investigation and the charging decision from Washington, a scenario known in FBI parlance as a “special,” the lawmakers said."
REVEALED: Multiple References to Potential Crimes Deleted From Early Drafts of Comey's Hillary Email Scandal Memo
"Everything that has happened in the Trump probe stands out against a backdrop of leniency in the Clinton investigation. While Mueller has prosecuted two Trump associates for lying to the FBI, the Obama Justice Department gave a pass to Mrs. Clinton and her subordinates, who gave the FBI misinformation about such key matters as whether Clinton understood markings in classified documents and whether her aides knew about her homebrew server system during their State Department service...The irregularities in the Clinton-emails investigation are breathtaking: the failure to use the grand jury to compel the production of key physical evidence; the Justice Department’s collaboration with defense lawyers to restrict the FBI’s ability to pursue obvious lines of inquiry and examine digital evidence; immunity grants to suspects who should have been charged with crimes and pressured to cooperate; allowing subjects of the investigation to be present for each other’s FBI interviews and even to act as lawyers for Clinton, in violation of legal and ethical rules; Comey’s preparation of a statement exonerating Clinton months before the investigation was complete and key witnesses — including Clinton herself — were interviewed; and the shameful tarmac meeting between Obama attorney general Loretta Lynch and Mrs. Clinton’s husband just days before Mrs. Clinton sat for a perfunctory FBI interview (after which Comey announced the decision not to charge her).
Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills both gave false statements to the FBI about their knowledge of the "homebrew" server. Rather than having the specter of prosecution hung over their heads, they were granted sweeping and generous immunity deals, under which they protected themselves and their boss. And they weren't the only ones:
A computer technician who deleted Clinton emails from her server in March 2015 after a congressional subpoena had been issued for them, originally lied to the FBI during his interviews, memos show. The witness’s name was redacted from documents released by the FBI but he was identified as an employee of a computer firm that helped maintained Clinton’s email server. His admission of false statements came one day after the Comey statement was already being drafted, investigators told The Hill. The computer employee originally told the FBI in a February 2016 interview that he did not recall making any deletions from Clinton’s server in March 2015, FBI records show. But then on May 3, 2016, the same employee in a subsequent FBI interview told agents he had an “oh shit moment” and in late March 2015 deleted Clinton’s email archive from the server, according to FBI documents reviewed by The Hill...the FBI decided not to pursue criminal charges against the witness, and instead gave the technician an immunity deal so he could correct his story, congressional investigators said.
This tech's name may have been redacted from the memos, but we've been aware of his "oh sh*t" moment for some time. Clinton's team started permanently eliminating evidence (which was under Congressional subpoena) after the New York Times publicly reported the existence of her private server. But unless I'm mistaken, this is the first we've heard about the "oh sh*t" guy having originally lied to the FBI about it. John Sexton notes the importance of the timeline here: "That line in bold is significant because it suggests that even as the FBI gained leverage against one of the minor players in the drama the higher-ups had already started writing Hillary’s exoneration." That does seem quite curious, doesn't it? And as Sexton writes, so does this:
Lawmakers on the House Judiciary Committee who attended a Dec. 21 closed-door briefing by FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe say the bureau official confirmed that the investigation and charging decisions were controlled by a small group in Washington headquarters rather the normal process of allowing field offices to investigate possible criminality in their localities. The Clinton email server in question was based in New York. In normal FBI cases, field offices where crimes are believed to have been committed investigate the evidence and then recommend to bureau hierarchy whether to pursue charges with prosecutors. In this case, the bureau hierarchy controlled both the investigation and the charging decision from Washington, a scenario known in FBI parlance as a “special,” the lawmakers said."
easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,101
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #31
The more evidence of FBI / Hillary / Obama crime and cover-up comes out the more snowflakes treat it like the plague and run the other way.
"I see NOTHING...lalalalalalala"!
"I see NOTHING...lalalalalalala"!
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,985
- 52,273
- 2,290
Double down: DoJ reopening Hillary e-mail scandal? - Hot Air
"Justice Department officials are taking a fresh look at Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while secretary of state, The Daily Beast has learned.
An ally of Attorney General Jeff Sessions who is familiar with the thinking at the Justice Department’s Washington headquarters described it as an effort to gather new details on how Clinton and her aides handled classified material. Officials’ questions include how much classified information was sent over Clinton’s server; who put that information into an unclassified environment, and how; and which investigators knew about these matters and when. The Sessions ally also said officials have questions about immunity agreements that Clinton aides may have made"
The proven most criminal administration in US history is no longer in charge, no more criminal FBI / DOJ to protect Hillary, and there is an undeniable amount of evidence of crimes not only perpetrated by Hillary but by the FBI and DOJ as well.
Here are the issues...
1) hilary and obama no longer control the law enforcement arm of the government...this is a good thing and now the FBI can do their jobs.
2) The bad thing.....comey, mccabe, rosenstein and the other minions have granted immunity deals, as one commentator said, like candy...giving immunity to people who should have been arrested...
It will be interesting to see what the FBI, no longer controlled by the clinton crime family, will do....
easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,101
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #33
2) The bad thing.....comey, mccabe, rosenstein and the other minions have granted immunity deals, as one commentator said, like candy...giving immunity to people who should have been arrested...
If it is proven that the FBI, engaging in criminal activity to cover-up crimes, issued those immunity deals as part of the illegal cover-up, those immunity deals - offered up by criminals breaking the law - are not worth toilet paper.
If the DOJ now sees Abedin and Mills, for example, were protected from indictment for 'Lying to the FBI' they could still be indicted.
DJT for Life
Gold Member
- Jun 21, 2017
- 3,468
- 899
- 195
I think the game plan is pretty clear.
Open the investigation...Seat a Grand Jury...Give the info to the Grand Jury
and then the Grand Jury indicts her.
That alone discredits...Lynch, Comey, Zero, all of them. The Public will have
seen that they had the evidence to indict her and then covered it up.
Nobody will ever believe or listen to any of them ever again.
I care less about the outcome 3 years from now. Just the theater, alone, will
discredit all the other crooks.
Open the investigation...Seat a Grand Jury...Give the info to the Grand Jury
and then the Grand Jury indicts her.
That alone discredits...Lynch, Comey, Zero, all of them. The Public will have
seen that they had the evidence to indict her and then covered it up.
Nobody will ever believe or listen to any of them ever again.
I care less about the outcome 3 years from now. Just the theater, alone, will
discredit all the other crooks.
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,985
- 52,273
- 2,290
2) The bad thing.....comey, mccabe, rosenstein and the other minions have granted immunity deals, as one commentator said, like candy...giving immunity to people who should have been arrested...
If it is proven that the FBI, engaging in criminal activity to cover-up crimes, issued those immunity deals as part of the illegal cover-up, those immunity deals - offered up by criminals breaking the law - are not worth toilet paper.
If the DOJ now sees Abedin and Mills, for example, were protected from indictment for 'Lying to the FBI' they could still be indicted.
I really, really hope so....because those illegal emails on Huma's computer......they open her up to actual jail time....and hilary can't pardon her...and the only thing she can offer is to support huma's kid while huma is in jail......not much of a deal for huma....so she might be very willing to cooperate...unless she is just another heartless, borg drone for hilary...
easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,101
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #36
Strzok should immediately be fired, not just 're-assigned'....and on the way out the door hand him his subpoena to appear before the Investigating Committee to explain his criminal activity.
Bring in Abedin and Mills and explain to them that unless they roll on Hillary they will be indicted for their 'Lying to the FBI'. Make it clear to Abedin that she is also facing charges for:
'Espionage'
'Gross Negligence'
'Criminal possession of Classified'
- 'Illegal / Unauthorized Laptop'
- 'Illegal possession of classified on an Un-encrypted Laptop'
- 'Illegal possession of classified on an Un-encrypted, unsecured Laptop'
...and she will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law (that she will be in jail long after her pedophile husband gets out) unless she rolls on Hillary.
Bring in Abedin and Mills and explain to them that unless they roll on Hillary they will be indicted for their 'Lying to the FBI'. Make it clear to Abedin that she is also facing charges for:
'Espionage'
'Gross Negligence'
'Criminal possession of Classified'
- 'Illegal / Unauthorized Laptop'
- 'Illegal possession of classified on an Un-encrypted Laptop'
- 'Illegal possession of classified on an Un-encrypted, unsecured Laptop'
...and she will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law (that she will be in jail long after her pedophile husband gets out) unless she rolls on Hillary.
TroglocratsRdumb
Diamond Member
- Aug 11, 2017
- 36,217
- 46,410
- 2,915
Hillary sent Huma a picture of the smoking holes in Vince Foster’s body as a warning to not testify against her.
Nobody's left to protect her. She's done, finally.BREAKINGBOMBSHELL: RUBES STILL FALLING FOR HILLARY IMMINENT INDICTMENT STORIES FOR FIFTH YEAR IN A ROW!!!
USMB - The champagne has gone flat, the cake is stale, but the tards are still wearing their party hats, waiting for the signal that will never come.
"I haven't gone to the bathroom in eighteen months", one creduloid who is literally full of shit stated. "I'm worried the indictment will come down while I'm taking a dump and I'll miss my chance to be the first to post about it."
As they talk in excited tones in their huddled groups, the eyes of the lonely chumps are constantly darting to their propaganda news sites, hoping against hope that today is finally the day.
"I heard an anonymous inside source has said an FBI agent said a judge has just signed a Tase on Sight (TOS) order for Hillary Clinton!", one dupe titters excitedly. "It's happening! It's finally happening!"
But, it isn't happening. It is never happening. And as the sun rises after another long lonely night's vigil and heartbreak, the saps wander blearily-eyed toward the nearest Dunkin Donuts with free wifi to recharge their pathetic souls with black coffee and day old crullers.
"It's being signed right now. I just know it, " one mutters to another as he checks his phone's signal strength.
TroglocratsRdumb
Diamond Member
- Aug 11, 2017
- 36,217
- 46,410
- 2,915
Hillary was corrupt when she was a senator's aide, a governor's wife, a first lady, a senator, a secretary of state and as a candidate for president.
What is it about Hillary that the Troglocrats don’t get?
Hillary is totally nefarious.
What is it about Hillary that the Troglocrats don’t get?
Hillary is totally nefarious.
Reasonable
Gold Member
- Feb 9, 2017
- 19,787
- 2,400
- 290
- Banned
- #40
ACCORDING TO A PROVEN PATHOLGICAL LIAR?You're just a rumor monger. None of that is true, according to Trump.Meanwhile what the country is talking about is Michael Wolff’s explosive new book that details Trump’s staff thinks he’s unprepared, a moron, dumb as shit” Etc
And his one time closest adviser Steve Bannon talking about the “ treasonous “ White House when it came to Russia.
Just how stupid are you?
A rhetorical question you need not answer.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 115
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 346
- Replies
- 28
- Views
- 305
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 11
- Views
- 33
- Replies
- 185
- Views
- 986
- Replies
- 8K
- Views
- 54K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8140
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 472
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-