DOJ goes full partisan.

Theres an investigation phase, there is the pretrial phase, and then the trial phase. 2-3 years seems fairly appropriate.
Yes... as I said, that's what the Dems thought in 2021.

You do not have that much time.

What is needed now is thinking outside-the-box.

Snapshot investigations. Snapshot defense-proof indictments. Speedy trials. Speedy sentencing of those found guilty.

Even if that means lighting a fire underneath those investigators, prosecutors and judges.

Time is your enemy in this context.

Follow the Law... but be damned-quick about it... certainly much quicker than has become the norm.

The Dems... and Merrick Garland... stupidly stuck to conventional timing, suffered analysis-paralysis, and ran out of time.

You must learn from the past, not repeat it.
 
Last edited:
Yes. As I said, that's what the Dems thought in 2021. You do not have that much time. It's time to think outside-the-box.
Dems needed to convict Trump before the election in order to wreck his chances of winning. The people we are going after arent running for election.
 
trump made a speech at the justice department today, the first by any president in a decade, in which he promised to attack people he didn't like.

Is that a paraphrase? Certainly. what he actually said was he has a far reaching mandate for investigating Democrats and news organizations that don't kiss his ass.

Yes he’s election and office allow him to investigate crimes
 
trump made a speech at the justice department today, the first by any president in a decade, in which he promised to attack people he didn't like.

Is that a paraphrase? Certainly. what he actually said was he has a far reaching mandate for investigating Democrats and news organizations that don't kiss his ass.

What the hell, thought all you loons were for Justice.
 
Biden started it.

The DOJ was fully partisan under Biden.

The whole world knows this.

Biden had to pardon his people because of it.
IMHO Partisan doesn't begin to even describe it.
 
Jack Smith has nothing to do with a laptop.

What is the indicating that Smith has committed a crime?


LOL, notice how Marener attempts to move the argument to what he wants, and not what is real!

The DOJ can NOT investigate Jack Smith, and we all know it..........but here comes the caveat.........they can investigate government actions that occurred, because well, they are the government.

And so, if they delve into government actions and discover a crime, they can then try and discover who/whom was party to that crime, and if it was a conspiracy. If it was Jackie boy and few of the people in the Biden Whitehouse, oh well, to bad, so sad!

EXAMPLE------>notice DOGE is finding all of this corrupt spending? Have you heard them name 1 PERSON who perpetrated it? Sure they named Stacy A, but not as the perp, but as the recipient from whomever allowed this to happen. Trust me, they are building a case against someone(s)!

That is the essence of American Juris Prudence, find a crime, then find the people who executed the crime. Ergo..........Government OVERSIGHT by government, is a thing folks. When you find a crime that occurred while doing oversight, and then do not prosecute? If that is the case, why do any oversight in the 1st place?!?!?! For all we know, it could have been a bunch of GOPers-)
 
How is that even remotely related?
Your masters taught you to hate him. Fed you the narrative that he was an existential threat to your very life. So that you would support their perversion of the justice system to literally attempt to put their political opponent in prison for the rest of his life.
 
Dems needed to convict Trump before the election in order to wreck his chances of winning. The people we are going after arent running for election.
You are already at-risk of losing the mid-terms. You just don't realize that yet. You may lose power sooner than you think.

Which is why I say what I say... get a move-on... get crackin'... the clock is running.
 
trump made a speech at the justice department today, the first by any president in a decade, in which he promised to attack people he didn't like.

Is that a paraphrase? Certainly. what he actually said was he has a far reaching mandate for investigating Democrats and news organizations that don't kiss his ass.


The dems invented the war on misinformation...why is it a problem when repubs fight against it?
 
You are already at-risk of losing the mid-terms. You just don't realize that yet.
What makes you say that? Democrats in Congress have an abysmal 20% approval rating. The GOP in Congress has a 40% approval rating. WE are at risk? Where is your false confidence coming from?
 
Last edited:
What's the matter Dems, don't like getting a dose of your own medicine? We're in the business of getting REVENGE on Democrats and business is a booming!
Just remember this, Crimes against the Constitution are not pardonable, or appealable.

See you down the road.
 
The D's should have passed on the idea of persecuting President Trump with fake indictments and court cases when they were in power.

Payback is a bitch, and if the D's had read Trump's masterpiece "Art of the Comeback", they would have known that getting even is a key point.
He should have broken the law, then. If he is alive in 2029, it all starts again.
 
Back
Top Bottom