DOJ goes full partisan.

[Crepitus]

BTW, if Jack Smith is legit and not fake, he has nothing to fear.

He will be given full due process in any investigation done, and will have full rights to hire teams of lawyers to make his case for innocence.

That's a lie. This is a vendetta, not a legal proceeding.

 

[Polishprince]

What is the basis for investigating Jack Smith apart from the obvious revenge aspect?

He may have committed a crime. If his motives were political, that would be a problem, no?

Investigators should be looking to see if he had talks with Biden's political operatives.

 

[DonGlock26]

That's a lie. This is a vendetta, not a legal proceeding.

Grand juries are perfectly legal.

 

[Marener]

Was he legitimately appointed for starters.

Yes. He was appointed by the AG. Is someone suggesting otherwise?

 

[DonGlock26]

Yes. He was appointed by the AG. Is someone suggesting otherwise?

Was that legal?

 

[Marener]

He may have committed a crime. If his motives were political, that would be a problem, no?

Investigators should be looking to see if he had talks with Biden's political operatives.

What is the basis to say that he “may have committed a crime”? Talking with people isn’t a crime.

 

[Polishprince]

That's a lie. This is a vendetta, not a legal proceeding.

Like I pointed out. If Jack Smith is as pure as New York snow as you suggest, he has nothing to fear.

He will be given Full Due Process and every chance conceivable to argue his innocence.

 

[Polishprince]

What is the basis to say that he “may have committed a crime”? Talking with people isn’t a crime.

Talking with people MIGHT be a crime, if its a conspiracy.

That's why having a full fledged investigation and getting this fellow in front of committees is so critical

 

[Marener]

Talking with people MIGHT be a crime, if its a conspiracy.

That's why having a full fledged investigation and getting this fellow in front of committees is so critical

Again, what’s the basis for the investigation? What’s the evidence that a crime occurred?

 

[Polishprince]

Yes. He was appointed by the AG. Is someone suggesting otherwise?

But he wasn't confirmed by the US Senate.

That's our constitution.

Why wasn't Jack Smith brought before a committee for hearings and votes before he started working on this witch hunt

 

[Polishprince]

Again, what’s the basis for the investigation? What’s the evidence that a crime occurred?

We've already seen the way the libs lied about the Hunter Laptop with their allegations that it was "russian disinformation"

And those were also Biden Political hacks.

There is definitely smoke here

 

[Crepitus]

.
So what else is new ?

VALLEY FORGE, Pa. — President Biden used his first campaign event of 2024 to call out his likely opponent, former President Donald Trump, for the threat he poses to American democracy, calling the issue a 'sacred cause' for the race ahead.

How is that even remotely related?

 

[Contumacious]

trump made a speech at the justice department today, the first by any president in a decade, in which he promised to attack people he didn't like.

Typical response by a PAID MERCENARY

More than likely the SOcialist Demon Rats are using LAUNDERED Ukranian Funds to pay this stupid son of a bitch


Totally baseless propaganda

 

[Marener]

But he wasn't confirmed by the US Senate.

That's our constitution.

Why wasn't Jack Smith brought before a committee for hearings and votes before he started working on this witch hunt

Special counsels have been appointed for decades without senate confirmation and it’s never been a problem before. Even when they appeared before SCOTUS as with Nixon.

SCOTUS has never said they need to be approved by Senate so Garland was merely following precedent.

What does that have to do with investigating Smith?

 

[Marener]

We've already seen the way the libs lied about the Hunter Laptop with their allegations that it was "russian disinformation"

And those were also Biden Political hacks.

There is definitely smoke here

Jack Smith has nothing to do with a laptop.

What is the indicating that Smith has committed a crime?

 

[Crepitus]

It was already partisan under Biden.

Blatantly untrue.

 

[Crepitus]

I had to check the date of this post. Seems like you should have used that headline four years ago or more.

Fake news.

If the DOJ had really been partisan under Biden tRump would not have been running for re-election, he would have been in prison.

 

[DonGlock26]

Special counsels have been appointed for decades without senate confirmation and it’s never been a problem before. Even when they appeared before SCOTUS as with Nixon.

SCOTUS has never said they need to be approved by Senate so Garland was merely following precedent.

What does that have to do with investigating Smith?

Negative.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.672.0_2.pdf

 

[DonGlock26]

Fake news.

If the DOJ had really been partisan under Biden tRump would not have been running for re-election, he would have been in prison.

They tried and failed. Now they get investigated. Enjoy.

 

[Crepitus]

What happened to, "If you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to Phear"?

The reality of the tRump administration.

That defense only works if the prosecution is honest.