frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 54,932
- 15,089
- 2,180
No, of course that's not what I'm saying. To begin with, there were warnings in both cases. Secondly, even with two days' warning, more people died in North Carolina. It is because of that and because of the speed at which the waters rose in this case that I am not convinced that earlier warnings or an early warning system would have made a difference.
And as I said, I am not, and will not, lay the deaths of young girls at anyone's feet unless I see solid evidence that their actions or inaction were a contributing factor. That is just too heavy a burden of guilt to just blithely throw out there based on circumstantial evidence.
The difference here is that in North Carolina nobody was camping beside a river. No kids died because nobody had told them that bad weather was coming.
A hurricane is a huge event. It covers half the state at least, it impacts so many people, and the winds are so strong that it's difficult to react.
In Kerrville, they were dealing with harsh weather ELSEWHERE, that led to lots of water coming at them. So, A) it's not obvious to those on the ground and B) all you need to do is get out of there and move to higher ground. The solution is far more simple than a hurricane where you have to move to another state which isn't always an option.
You want to see evidence of inaction?
Texas officials scrapped ‘Flash Flood Alley’ warning system before 27 killed at Camp Mystic — because it was too expensive
Officials in Kerr County, Texas — where 27 campers and counselors at a Christian summer camp were killed in catastrophic flooding — had discussed installing a flood warning system along…
"Officials in Kerr County, Texas — where 27 campers and counselors at a Christian summer camp were killed in catastrophic flooding — had discussed installing a flood warning system along the banks of the Guadalupe River, known as “Flash Flood Alley,” but it was rejected as too expensive."
