Doge Just keeps hitting it out of the park! Pritzker!!

[justoffal]

It would stand to reason any president whose actions are struck down in court is too incompetent to be president.

Based on your logic.

Normally I would agree..... Except that the last 25 years have seen an awful lot of activism from the federal bench. By the way any president who doesn't trigger a court case is not working till the full extent of his capacity.... He's going to win this one. The executive branch has every right to look at the records.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

It's forthcoming.

When? From whom?

 

[Mac-7]

It would stand to reason any president whose actions are struck down in court is too incompetent to be president.

Based on your logic.

Presidents are not supposed to be infallible legal experts

But judges are

Imagine a doctor who makes mistakes that are fatal to his patients

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

When? From whom?

From the DOJ

 

[justoffal]

Presidents are not supposed to be infallible legal experts

But judges are

Imagine a doctor who makes mistakes that are fatal to his patients

Having said that a lot of the constitutional mechanics between the branches are still very foggy even for the sharpest legal minds. The one thing that they won't be able to defend is trying to keep the secretary out of his own records. That is absolutely clear-cut, no debate 100% judicial overreach. He would first have to be convicted of a crime in a court of law and stripped of his privileges. That's not going to happen and he will be back into those records probably in less than a month.

 

[Marener]

Presidents are not supposed to be infallible legal experts

But judges are

Imagine a doctor who makes mistakes that are fatal to his patients

No one is an infallible expert. If judges were supposed to be infallible, there’d be no need for appeals.

Besides. We are talking about a temporary restraining order. It’s just putting a pause on making any changes until the case can be heard and decided. It’s not a ruling. Just maintaining the status quo in a dispute.

Wanting to trash the legal system because it is very short sighted.

 

[justoffal]

No one is an infallible expert. If judges were supposed to be infallible, there’d be no need for appeals.

Besides. We are talking about a temporary restraining order. It’s just putting a pause on making any changes until the case can be heard and decided. It’s not a ruling. Just maintaining the status quo in a dispute.

Wanting to trash the legal system because it is very short sighted.

So far the United States legal system has shown itself to be fairly self policing. Even the ridiculous sham in New York State pretty much stayed in the state... The other cases that never really had any merit simply fell apart because once the phomy support for them went away there was really nothing left to pursue.

Forbidding the secretary of the Treasury from examining the Treasury records is judicial overreach in its purest form. The secretary could simply ignore the order because it's unconstitutional.... However he's doing the smart thing and waiting for the order to be overturned which it most certainly will be.

Jo

 

[Marener]

Forbidding the secretary of the Treasury from examining the Treasury records is judicial overreach in its purest form.

It doesn’t. Yet again, you believe dumb crap from Twitter.

 

[justoffal]

It doesn’t. Yet again, you believe dumb crap from Twitter.

I actually haven't seen anything on Twitter about it. Don't need Twitter.

There's no question that it's judicial overreach and it will certainly be reversed.

The judge can rule on crimes committed but he cannot rule outside of his own purview that interferes with executive privilege.

The Secretary is in the executive branch and the Treasury is his. Nobody can prevent him from looking at the records. He could do it now.... He's locked himself out but he could let himself back in with absolutely no legal repercussions. His cooperation is a courtesy to the court not an obeisance to it.

 

[Marener]

I've actually haven't say anything on Twitter about it. There's no question that it's judicial overreach and it will certainly be reversed.
The judge can rule on crimes committed but he cannot rule outside of his own purview that interferes with executive privilege. The Secretary is in the executive branch and the Treasury is his. Nobody can prevent him from looking at the records. He could do it now.... He's locked himself out but he could let himself back in with absolutely no legal repercussions. His cooperation is a courtesy to the court not an obeisance to it.

Okay. Then where did you get the impression the treasury secretary was forbidden from examining their own information?

Thats not what the order says. People posted about it on Twitter, but like a lot of things perpetuated through right wing media, it’s false.

 

[Mac-7]

No one is an infallible expert. If judges were supposed to be infallible, there’d be no need for appeals.

Besides. We are talking about a temporary restraining order. It’s just putting a pause on making any changes until the case can be heard and decided. It’s not a ruling. Just maintaining the status quo in a dispute.

Wanting to trash the legal system because it is very short sighted.

I have been arguing against the judges for years

Whats taking place us not new

Its really just a continuation of the 2024 presidential election

 

[Marener]

I have been arguing against the judges for years

Whats taking place us not new

Its really just a continuation of the 2024 presidential election

Plenty of bogus judges made bogus rulings against Biden in the last 4 years, which you didn’t argue against.

Ignoring the legal system just proves MAGA is authoritarian.

 

[Mac-7]

Plenty of bogus judges made bogus rulings against Biden in the last 4 years, which you didn’t argue against.

Ignoring the legal system just proves MAGA is authoritarian.

Maybe you should have said something at the time

 

[TimFitz]

It's forthcoming.

You made it up.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

You made it up.

I made a prediction. We'll see if I'm right.

 

[TimFitz]

Not a smear.... It would appear that the governor's family is making lots of money off of the illegals.
That would explain why he was so animated at the thought of losing his illegal population. Pritzkers........64 freaking ngos ..... What a racket!

it’s a smear.

It’s Alex Jones, the drunken. Liar and cheap demogogue.

he never had any facts or credibility.

There will be nothing further other than similar made up smears, with no evidence.

You fell for it, as you always do.

 

[Marener]

Maybe you should have said something at the time

Aileen Cannon should have been removed from the bench back in 2022 when the 11th circuit overruled her appointing a special master for Trump's espionage case.

Right?

 

[Mac-7]

Aileen Cannon should have been removed from the bench back in 2022 when the 11th circuit overruled her appointing a special master for Trump's espionage case.

Right?

I dont know the details of the trump or biden mishandling of classified documents

I do think hillary was guilty of the same

We need equal treatment for everyone

 

[Marener]

I dont know the details of the trump or biden mishandling of classified documents

I do think hillary was guilty of the same

We need equal treatment for everyone

Right. You think a judge that is overruled should be dismissed.

Cannon was overruled in December 2022.

Should have she been dismissed?

 

[BackAgain]

Do we wonder why Musk is facing so much opposition? Look at the people who are being thrown out of the corners and the closets into the light of public observation! We never would have known anything about any of these things.

Wasn't Elliot Pritzker the former Attorney General for the state of New York?

I wonder how New York's current Attorney General fits in with this crowd?

Do you think she's got a couple of NGOs?
I wonder.

Pritzker wasn’t a NY official. But he is a dick.