Does Viking Hat Man have any standing to sue?

Lisa558

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 2021
46,951
49,262
3,488
The Dems have REALLY over-reacted, who used Viking man - a silly but peaceful protestor who injured nobody - by throwing him in prison and subjecting him to horrible conditions while the Democrat-run California let a violent black criminal out after attempting to murder his baby mama, who then went on to murder six innocent white people two days later.

Viking man is a nonviolent person who presents no danger and should have been released on bail. This is even more apparent in the face of Dems’ attempt to soften crimes - in NY, armed robbery and trespassing, to name just two, are now misdemeanors.

Clearly, Viking has been taken as a political prisoner and has been exploited for Democrats, with the liberal media falsely calling the event an insurrection, to use as a campaign tactic.

Thus, could he sue for either defamation, cruel and unusual punishment and/or lack of equal treatment under the law?
 
Last edited:
The Dems have REALLY over-reacted, who used Viking man - a silly but peaceful protestor who injured nobody - by throwing him in prison and subjecting him to horrible conditions while the Democrat-run California let a violent black criminal out after attempting to murder his baby mama, who then went on to murder six innocent white people two days later.

Viking man is a nonviolent person who presents no danger and should have been released on bail. This is even more apparent in the face of Dems’ attempt to soften crimes - in NY, armed robbery and trespassing, to name just two, are now misdemeanors.

Clearly, Viking has been taken as a political prisoner and has been exploited for Democrats, with the liberal media falsely calling the event an insurrection, to use as a campaign tactic.

Thus, could he sue for either defamation, cruel and unusual punishment and/or lack of equal treatment under the law?
The two cases don’t have any bearing on each other. They both belong in jail.

Oh yes, to answer the question, a person under Federal jurisdiction would have no standing to challenge the ruling of a state court that didn’t involve them.
 
Last edited:
The two cases don’t have any bearing on each other. They both belong in jail.
Why both?

The first one, the racist who murdered 6 whites and was aiming to kill 40, is clearly a danger to society. He was a violent thug who never should have been released on bail, yet he was - days before his murder spree.

The second one is non-violent, and the purpose of bail is to keep violent and dangerous lowlifes off the street to keep them from harming other people. Even still, we have seen how Democrat cities release assaulters and other violent criminals on bail, so why shouldn’t this non-violent man have been released?

You can say the two cases aren’t related, but they do show the different standards the Democrats apply - go easy on a violent man if he is black, and throw a non-violent white man in jail.
 
To me, Viking guy is getting hosed. He's just a mellow guy with bad fashion sense who was in the wrong place. His crime should be B&E at the very worst and he should have been returned to his life immediately.
 
The Dems have REALLY over-reacted, who used Viking man - a silly but peaceful protestor who injured nobody - by throwing him in prison and subjecting him to horrible conditions while the Democrat-run California let a violent black criminal out after attempting to murder his baby mama, who then went on to murder six innocent white people two days later.

Hey, stupid, that happened in Wisconsin, not California... Don't you ever get tired of being wrong about everything.

Viking man is a nonviolent person who presents no danger and should have been released on bail. This is even more apparent in the face of Dems’ attempt to soften crimes - in NY, armed robbery and trespassing, to name just two, are now misdemeanors.
Except none of those involved an attempt to overthrow the government, that's the thing.

Thus, could he sue for either defamation, cruel and unusual punishment and/or lack of equal treatment under the law?
He could... and be laughed out of court. Kind of hard given that he has ALREADY PLED GUILTY to what he was accused of.


Boy don't you feel stupid.
 
To me, Viking guy is getting hosed. He's just a mellow guy with bad fashion sense who was in the wrong place. His crime should be B&E at the very worst and he should have been returned to his life immediately.
Absolutely. He is being treated as a political prisoner - something you find in North Korea. In the meantime, Harris supported a fund to RELEASE rioters on bail after being arrested at BLM riots,

Just learned that the political prisoner has been sentenced to 41 months in prison.

 
The guy who was denied medical care should sue the torturers in charge of the DC jail

A federal judge found the warden of the D.C. jail and director of the D.C. Department of Corrections in contempt of court Wednesday and called on the Justice Department to investigate whether the jail is violating the civil rights of dozens of detained Jan. 6 defendants.
 
The guy who was denied medical care should sue the torturers in charge of the DC jail

A federal judge found the warden of the D.C. jail and director of the D.C. Department of Corrections in contempt of court Wednesday and called on the Justice Department to investigate whether the jail is violating the civil rights of dozens of detained Jan. 6 defendants.
The double standards of Democrats are blinding.
 
Why both?

The first one, the racist who murdered 6 whites and was aiming to kill 40, is clearly a danger to society. He was a violent thug who never should have been released on bail, yet he was - days before his murder spree.

Except he didn't get bail for killing six people... he got bail for a domestic violence charge. Now, while we an argue that we don't treat domestic violence serious enough, his crime wasn't really serious enough to merit prison without bail.

The second one is non-violent, and the purpose of bail is to keep violent and dangerous lowlifes off the street to keep them from harming other people. Even still, we have seen how Democrat cities release assaulters and other violent criminals on bail, so why shouldn’t this non-violent man have been released?

Well, because, again, he was part of a mob that tried to attack members of Congress.

You can say the two cases aren’t related, but they do show the different standards the Democrats apply - go easy on a violent man if he is black, and throw a non-violent white man in jail.

Except this person wasn't non-violent...
 
I don't know if he would win.
But he has a new career as a meme image...
5lmxe5.jpg


Seriously.
If anyone thought these clowns were actually taking over the government and installingTrump, they should see their doctors and up the Xanax significantly.
 
The Dems have REALLY over-reacted, who used Viking man - a silly but peaceful protestor who injured nobody - by throwing him in prison and subjecting him to horrible conditions while the Democrat-run California let a violent black criminal out after attempting to murder his baby mama, who then went on to murder six innocent white people two days later.

Viking man is a nonviolent person who presents no danger and should have been released on bail. This is even more apparent in the face of Dems’ attempt to soften crimes - in NY, armed robbery and trespassing, to name just two, are now misdemeanors.

Clearly, Viking has been taken as a political prisoner and has been exploited for Democrats, with the liberal media falsely calling the event an insurrection, to use as a campaign tactic.

Thus, could he sue for either defamation, cruel and unusual punishment and/or lack of equal treatment under the law?
It wasn't a "Viking" hat... it was a buffalo headress ( Indian, or Native American ), wasn't it?

Oh... and... he participated... in a highly visible manner... in Insurrection against the United States and an assault on Congress.

Phukk him... let him rot.
 
Only idiot Dems could think these people basically LARPing was the urgent "threat to Democracy" they are pretending it was. Their entire drama this past week was embarrassing. Our Founding Fathers would be first, appalled, and second, laugh heartily at what utter pansies they are for blatant political ends.

Shameful, frankly.
 
This Viking guy seems like a nice guy but he's definitely stupid for attracting so much attention to himself with that getup. He's like a guy with a 'Bad Cop-No Donut' bumper sticker, who can't figure out why the cop who pulled him over is treating him so poorly.
 
Only idiot Dems could think these people basically LARPing was the urgent "threat to Democracy" they are pretending it was. Their entire drama this past week was embarrassing. Our Founding Fathers would be first, appalled, and second, laugh heartily at what utter pansies they are for blatant political ends.

Shameful, frankly.
The founding fathers would have slaughtered them and turned their graves into a public urinal.
 
Absolutely. He is being treated as a political prisoner - something you find in North Korea. In the meantime, Harris supported a fund to RELEASE rioters on bail after being arrested at BLM riots,

Just learned that the political prisoner has been sentenced to 41 months in prison.

Absolutely

They were warned for 2 weeks something was up. Pelosi and Head pf Cap police refused numerous times the help required....They knew there might be trouble

The staff was woefully understaffed that day KNOWING a zillion people would be there. Putting dots together?

They had professional FBI and agitators like RAY EPPS there. More dots

I summed all this up pretty quick that evening.................Something smelled like a Trump Trap

I want Pelosi's emails of the entire 2 weeks before and after. Same with those police running the show
 
I don't know if he would win.
But he has a new career as a meme image...
View attachment 585665

Seriously.
If anyone thought these clowns were actually taking over the government and installingTrump, they should see their doctors and up the Xanax significantly.
I know. It is so hilarious......Look at Bufs friend there...................lolololol
 
Right because what goes in the "sacred" halls of the Senate is so very close to what they envisioned, right?

Please. Really.
These people desecrated the temple of democracy. Had it been leftists you would want them deader than dead. This cannot happen again. The right downplaying it makes sure it will.
 

Forum List

Back
Top