Does the USA need more socialism or less socialism?

You are either incredibly stupid or seriously dishonest, or both...







With Tom DeLay passing out $10k Pfizer checks on the House floor, the GOP House Senate and WH socialized drugs in 2004. But that's not all. The W White House had an actuary estimate the cost of socializing senior drugs. The W White House told him to "shut up or else."

And that's how ZIONIST FASCISM operates, currently as the ONLY ISRAEL MATTERS "Republican Party."
You make great points and then go off the rails with your insane, irrelevant racism. SMH.
 
If I was, in sentence 1, we would be twins.


So are you denying that W GOP House Senate socialized senior drugs in 2004 at a RETAIL PRICE (not a bulk volume discount) as Tom DeLay was passing out Pfizer checks on the House floor?
 
So are you denying that W GOP House Senate socialized senior drugs in 2004 at a RETAIL PRICE (not a bulk volume discount) as Tom DeLay was passing out Pfizer checks on the House floor?


I never mentioned that. For a person dressed in crazy conspiracy points, to come at me amazes me.
 
I never mentioned that. For a person dressed in crazy conspiracy points, to come at me amazes me.



So you are postulating that the W/GOP HOUSE AND SENATE did NOT socialize senior drugs in 2004 at a retail price while Tom DeLay was passing out $10k Pfizer checks on the House floor during the vote, and the NYT just made up this "conspiracy theory" that the TREASONOUS ZIONIST FASCIST W Administration didn't like their very own actuary's cost estimate, so they told him to


SHUT UP OR ELSE

and the US TAXPAYER has been sending PFizer's stock price higher ever since
 
That is not close to the topic.



It wouldn't be an issue if your treasonously dishonest ass had just admitted YES W/GOP socialized senior drugs in 2004



but you had to LIE about that, because as a TREASONOUS ZIONIST FASCIST, you LIE....
 
The US is a mixed economy. Corporations of course demand legal protections from both the public and each other, hence the role of govt. increases with the size of corporations. Much of that protection is from competition. As John D. Rockefeller said, " Competition was a sin." This feeling was universal among all the robber barons and bankers. J.P. Morgan was vehemently opposed to 'ruinous competition" his entire life, and of course loved the protection bankruptcy courts provided for his various schemes. It was the Gilded Age that produced the 'corporate personhood' scams. He owned most of the judges.

It's called 'privatizing the profits while socializing the costs."

 
Really....

can poor kids(parents) chose their schools?
Who pays a RETAIL price for W/GOP socializing senior drugs in 2004?
How was the handling of Covid lockdowns and mandated murderous fraud vax not socialist?
In Socialism, the Government controls the means of production

Schools are a social program…..not Socialism
 
the Government controls the means of production


National Socialism had govt "dictating" and "purchasing" straight from the private sector, which is what W's socialization of senior drugs did.

Communism controls means of production, not socialism, or not all of socialism.
 
Socialism is where the Government controls the means of production

Show where that is happening
Not yet I told you. But the defenders of socialism work hard to install full blown socialism in the USA. Of course they want to blame people like me for their failures.

Survey all permits for instances of Government control. Survey rules production must obey, and right now. Survey the vast quantity of rules proposed against production all the time.
 
In Socialism, the Government controls the means of production

Schools are a social program…..not Socialism
Schools produce education and are in fact laws citizens must follow.
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom