Does CNN realize we are a Christian nation?

BlindBoo
"Endowed by their creator" you are dumber than a roadkill toad.
Thomas Paine and our first four presidents were not Christians. They were very much opposed to the organized Christianity of Europe .The Creator in the Declaration of Independence is not the Biblical War God Yahweh; Father of Jesus!

Your Trump loves money not God?

Jefferson’s Creator is a universal rational mind. Something Trump and his Jesus believers will never be ableto touch ~ the rational mind of God.
IMG_6657.webp
Theism belief-6-walk on the beach .webp
 
Last edited:
The case of Reynolds v. United States was decided in 1879 by the Supreme Court … The Justices involved were:
  • Chief Justice Morrison Waite
  • Associate Justice Nathan Clifford
  • Associate Justice Noah H. Swayne
  • Associate Justice Samuel F. Miller
  • Associate Justice Stephen J. Field
  • Associate Justice William Strong
  • Associate Justice Joseph P. Bradley
  • Associate Justice Ward Hunt
  • Associate Justice John M. Harlan
These Justices were appointed by different presidents:
  • Stephen Johnson Field: Appointed by Abraham Lincoln.
  • William Strong, Joseph P. Bradley, and Ward Hunt: All appointed by Ulysses S. Grant.
  • Morrison Remick Waite: Appointed by Ulysses S. Grant.



The laws you endorse are atheist; not Christian, such as abortion on demand.

I endorse the inalienable right of free conscience and of privacy given to every woman who has ever been born by her creator thus keeping our government out of women’s reproductive decisions as a strict application of maintains a wall of separation between church and state.

Your Catholic opinion has no justifiable bearing on the lives of my wife, my daughters and all the granddaughters that will come after me. You are a foul and religiously perverted human being. Foul un-American religious zealots such as you St.Mashmont the Trump Pervert must not be allowed to rule non-zealots by your perverted asinine religious dogma.

from here on below r1776r-jffrsnBIBLE


The Supreme Court turned the spotlight on the "wall of separation" phrase in 1878 by declaring in Reynolds v. United States "that it may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [first] amendment."

The high court took the same position in widely publicized decisions in 1947 and 1948, asserting in the latter case, McCollum v. Board of Education, that, "in the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect 'a wall of separation between church and state.'" Since McCollum forbade religious instruction in public schools, it appeared that the court had used Jefferson's "wall" metaphor as a sword to sever religion from public life, a result that was and still is intolerable to many Americans.

Some Supreme Court justices did not like what their colleagues had done. In 1962, Justice Potter Stewart complained that jurisprudence was not "aided by the uncritical invocation of metaphors like the 'wall of separation,' a phrase nowhere to be found in the Constitution." Addressing the issue in 1985, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist lamented that "unfortunately the Establishment Clause has been expressly freighted with Jefferson's misleading metaphor for nearly 40 years." Defenders of the metaphor responded immediately: "despite its detractors and despite its leaks, cracks and its archways, the wall ranks as one of the mightiest monuments of constitutional government in this nation."

Given the gravity of the issues involved in the debate over the wall metaphor, it is surprising that so little effort has been made to go behind the printed text of the Danbury Baptist letter to unlock its secrets. Jefferson's handwritten draft of the letter is held by the Library's Manuscript Division. Inspection reveals that nearly 30 percent of the draft -- seven of 25 lines -- was deleted by the president prior to publication. Jefferson indicated his deletions by circling several lines and noting in the left margin that they were to be excised. He inked out several words in the circled section and a few words elsewhere in the draft. He also inked out three entire lines following the circled section. Click here to see the text of the final letter.
 
Last edited:
It's not. It's stronger than ever.
Republican political Christianity is strong. Not sure spiritual Christianity is doing very well. Trump is Destroying real Christianity. By attracting flavor, such as yourself

Do you consider yourself St.Mashmont to be a born again Christian as defined here:

Being a "born-again Christian" signifies a spiritual rebirth or transformation where an individual accepts Jesus Christ as their savior and Lord, experiencing a change in their relationship with God. This new spiritual life is often characterized by a desire to follow Jesus' teachings, a turning away from sin, and a growing love for God and others. It's a process of spiritual growth and a commitment to living a life that reflects Christian values.

Here's a more detailed explanation:
1. Spiritual Rebirth:
  • The term "born again" originates from the biblical concept of spiritual transformation, where an individual is seen as receiving new life through faith in Jesus Christ.

  • This isn't a physical rebirth, but rather a spiritual one, signifying a change in one's relationship with God.

  • It's a process of turning away from a life of sin and embracing a new life centered on God.

  • This transformation is believed to be initiated by the Holy Spirit and involves a change of heart, a turning towards God, and a desire to live according to His will.
2. Accepting Jesus Christ:
  • A core aspect of being born again is accepting Jesus Christ as the Son of God and one's personal savior.

  • This involves acknowledging one's sins and asking for forgiveness through Jesus' sacrifice on the cross.

  • It's also about believing in Jesus' resurrection and accepting the gift of eternal life through faith in Him.
3. Changed Life and Spiritual Growth:
  • After being born again, Christians often experience a desire to live a life that reflects their new faith.

  • This can include changes in behavior, such as turning away from sinful habits and seeking to live a more God-honoring life.

  • There's a growing love for God and others, and a desire to follow Jesus' teachings.

  • This includes developing spiritual disciplines like prayer, Bible study, and fellowship with other believers.

  • It's a process of spiritual growth, where Christians strive to become more like Jesus.
4. Not a Formula:
  • Being born again is not just a one-time event or a simple formula to memorize.

  • It's a continuous process of spiritual transformation and growth, a journey of faith.

  • It involves ongoing repentance, a seeking of God's will, and a desire to live a life that is pleasing to Him.

  • Even after experiencing a spiritual rebirth, Christians may still struggle with sin, but they are empowered by God's grace to overcome and grow in their faith.
bornagAInxtian Thomas Paine and our first for presidents were not born again Christian
 
Last edited:
Obama practically walks on water, morality-wise, next to Trump.

Hillary is as much an opportunist as Trump. Birds of a feather.

In fact, she and Bill were close friends with Trump. Bill was Trump's golf buddy, and the Clintons attended Trump's third wedding.

Trump used to defend Bill on the subject of Bill's impeachment. He called bullshit on it, while in the same interview, he demanding Pelosi impeach Bush.

Trump is, and always has been, a far left limousine liberal New York Democrat.

Borrow and spend. Protectionism. Immoral as it gets. Russia's ***** boi. Pathological liar.

It amazes me the cult has never caught on where he is taking them.

Perdition.
the dem/lib/media propaganda has worked on you, nothing in your post is true and the american voters know it.
 
The case of Reynolds v. United States was decided in 1879 by the Supreme Court … The Justices involved were:
  • Chief Justice Morrison Waite
  • Associate Justice Nathan Clifford
  • Associate Justice Noah H. Swayne
  • Associate Justice Samuel F. Miller
  • Associate Justice Stephen J. Field
  • Associate Justice William Strong
  • Associate Justice Joseph P. Bradley
  • Associate Justice Ward Hunt
  • Associate Justice John M. Harlan
These Justices were appointed by different presidents:
  • Stephen Johnson Field: Appointed by Abraham Lincoln.
  • William Strong, Joseph P. Bradley, and Ward Hunt: All appointed by Ulysses S. Grant.
  • Morrison Remick Waite: Appointed by Ulysses S. Grant.





I endorse the inalienable right of free conscience and of privacy given to every woman who has ever been born by her creator thus keeping our government out of women’s reproductive decisions as a strict application of maintains a wall of separation between church and state.

Your Catholic opinion has no justifiable bearing on the lives of my wife, my daughters and all the granddaughters that will come after me. You are a foul and religiously perverted human being. Foul un-American religious zealots such as you St.Mashmont the Trump Pervert must not be allowed to rule non-zealots by your perverted asinine religious dogma.

from here on below r1776r-jffrsnBIBLE


The Supreme Court turned the spotlight on the "wall of separation" phrase in 1878 by declaring in Reynolds v. United States "that it may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [first] amendment."

The high court took the same position in widely publicized decisions in 1947 and 1948, asserting in the latter case, McCollum v. Board of Education, that, "in the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect 'a wall of separation between church and state.'" Since McCollum forbade religious instruction in public schools, it appeared that the court had used Jefferson's "wall" metaphor as a sword to sever religion from public life, a result that was and still is intolerable to many Americans.

Some Supreme Court justices did not like what their colleagues had done. In 1962, Justice Potter Stewart complained that jurisprudence was not "aided by the uncritical invocation of metaphors like the 'wall of separation,' a phrase nowhere to be found in the Constitution." Addressing the issue in 1985, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist lamented that "unfortunately the Establishment Clause has been expressly freighted with Jefferson's misleading metaphor for nearly 40 years." Defenders of the metaphor responded immediately: "despite its detractors and despite its leaks, cracks and its archways, the wall ranks as one of the mightiest monuments of constitutional government in this nation."

Given the gravity of the issues involved in the debate over the wall metaphor, it is surprising that so little effort has been made to go behind the printed text of the Danbury Baptist letter to unlock its secrets. Jefferson's handwritten draft of the letter is held by the Library's Manuscript Division. Inspection reveals that nearly 30 percent of the draft -- seven of 25 lines -- was deleted by the president prior to publication. Jefferson indicated his deletions by circling several lines and noting in the left margin that they were to be excised. He inked out several words in the circled section and a few words elsewhere in the draft. He also inked out three entire lines following the circled section. Click here to see the text of the final letter.
when does the unborn human get a vote on whether to live or die? funny, not one of you "choose" freaks can ever answer that simple question.
 
BlindBoo

Thomas Paine and our first four presidents were not Christians. They were very much opposed to the organized Christianity of Europe .The Creator in the Declaration of Independence is not the Biblical War God Yahweh; Father of Jesus!

Your Trump loves money not God?

Jefferson’s Creator is a universal rational mind. Something Trump and his Jesus believers will never be ableto touch ~ the rational mind of God.View attachment 1135119View attachment 1135120
the founders were opposed to the power of the Pope and the Priests in old Europe. They wanted freedom of religion, not mandated religion where the priests had more power than the kings.
 
Your unChrisitian comment suffers from the fact that "endowed by their creator" appears nowhere in the U,S, Constitution.

Let's try to respect the truth, at least.
declaration of independence is one of our founding documents. did you fail 3rd grade?
 
fools like you are allowing Islam to take over the world and you are too dumb to even know it. the UK is already lost, France is next, then the rest of Europe.
So, my nonbelief in a sky daddy cop god who tortures people eternally for a non-belief is allowing Muslims in? How can that be when I am for closed borders? Seems to me it was nutty people in the UK and France who did that.
 
So, my nonbelief in a sky daddy cop god who tortures people eternally for a non-belief is allowing Muslims in? How can that be when I am for closed borders? Seems to me it was nutty people in the UK and France who did that.
feigning ignorance doesn't work. Islam is on a 100 year jihad to rule the entire world. They are succeeding due to ignorance such as yours. Why do you think they established muslim enclaves in MIchigan and Minnesota if not to send muslims to the US congress. They are winning due to ignorance such as yours.
 
Look at the red line. Never Attend. Skyrocketed during Trump 1.0. Leveled out in 2022.

We'll have to see what happens during Trump 2.0.

The case of Reynolds v. United States was decided in 1879 by the Supreme Court … The Justices involved were:
  • Chief Justice Morrison Waite
  • Associate Justice Nathan Clifford
  • Associate Justice Noah H. Swayne
  • Associate Justice Samuel F. Miller
  • Associate Justice Stephen J. Field
  • Associate Justice William Strong
  • Associate Justice Joseph P. Bradley
  • Associate Justice Ward Hunt
  • Associate Justice John M. Harlan
These Justices were appointed by different presidents:
  • Stephen Johnson Field: Appointed by Abraham Lincoln.
  • William Strong, Joseph P. Bradley, and Ward Hunt: All appointed by Ulysses S. Grant.
  • Morrison Remick Waite: Appointed by Ulysses S. Grant.





I endorse the inalienable right of free conscience and of privacy given to every woman who has ever been born by her creator thus keeping our government out of women’s reproductive decisions as a strict application of maintains a wall of separation between church and state.

Your Catholic opinion has no justifiable bearing on the lives of my wife, my daughters and all the granddaughters that will come after me. You are a foul and religiously perverted human being. Foul un-American religious zealots such as you St.Mashmont the Trump Pervert must not be allowed to rule non-zealots by your perverted asinine religious dogma.

from here on below r1776r-jffrsnBIBLE


The Supreme Court turned the spotlight on the "wall of separation" phrase in 1878 by declaring in Reynolds v. United States "that it may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [first] amendment."

The high court took the same position in widely publicized decisions in 1947 and 1948, asserting in the latter case, McCollum v. Board of Education, that, "in the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect 'a wall of separation between church and state.'" Since McCollum forbade religious instruction in public schools, it appeared that the court had used Jefferson's "wall" metaphor as a sword to sever religion from public life, a result that was and still is intolerable to many Americans.

Some Supreme Court justices did not like what their colleagues had done. In 1962, Justice Potter Stewart complained that jurisprudence was not "aided by the uncritical invocation of metaphors like the 'wall of separation,' a phrase nowhere to be found in the Constitution." Addressing the issue in 1985, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist lamented that "unfortunately the Establishment Clause has been expressly freighted with Jefferson's misleading metaphor for nearly 40 years." Defenders of the metaphor responded immediately: "despite its detractors and despite its leaks, cracks and its archways, the wall ranks as one of the mightiest monuments of constitutional government in this nation."

Given the gravity of the issues involved in the debate over the wall metaphor, it is surprising that so little effort has been made to go behind the printed text of the Danbury Baptist letter to unlock its secrets. Jefferson's handwritten draft of the letter is held by the Library's Manuscript Division. Inspection reveals that nearly 30 percent of the draft -- seven of 25 lines -- was deleted by the president prior to publication. Jefferson indicated his deletions by circling several lines and noting in the left margin that they were to be excised. He inked out several words in the circled section and a few words elsewhere in the draft. He also inked out three entire lines following the circled section. Click here to see the text of the final letter.
You can't separate church and state without the default being atheism, which is exactly why the atheist left pretends the Constitution separates the two.
 
The case of Reynolds v. United States was decided in 1879 by the Supreme Court … The Justices involved were:
  • Chief Justice Morrison Waite
  • Associate Justice Nathan Clifford
  • Associate Justice Noah H. Swayne
  • Associate Justice Samuel F. Miller
  • Associate Justice Stephen J. Field
  • Associate Justice William Strong
  • Associate Justice Joseph P. Bradley
  • Associate Justice Ward Hunt
  • Associate Justice John M. Harlan
These Justices were appointed by different presidents:
  • Stephen Johnson Field: Appointed by Abraham Lincoln.
  • William Strong, Joseph P. Bradley, and Ward Hunt: All appointed by Ulysses S. Grant.
  • Morrison Remick Waite: Appointed by Ulysses S. Grant.





I endorse the inalienable right of free conscience and of privacy given to every woman who has ever been born by her creator thus keeping our government out of women’s reproductive decisions as a strict application of maintains a wall of separation between church and state.

Your Catholic opinion has no justifiable bearing on the lives of my wife, my daughters and all the granddaughters that will come after me. You are a foul and religiously perverted human being. Foul un-American religious zealots such as you St.Mashmont the Trump Pervert must not be allowed to rule non-zealots by your perverted asinine religious dogma.

from here on below r1776r-jffrsnBIBLE


The Supreme Court turned the spotlight on the "wall of separation" phrase in 1878 by declaring in Reynolds v. United States "that it may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [first] amendment."

The high court took the same position in widely publicized decisions in 1947 and 1948, asserting in the latter case, McCollum v. Board of Education, that, "in the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect 'a wall of separation between church and state.'" Since McCollum forbade religious instruction in public schools, it appeared that the court had used Jefferson's "wall" metaphor as a sword to sever religion from public life, a result that was and still is intolerable to many Americans.

Some Supreme Court justices did not like what their colleagues had done. In 1962, Justice Potter Stewart complained that jurisprudence was not "aided by the uncritical invocation of metaphors like the 'wall of separation,' a phrase nowhere to be found in the Constitution." Addressing the issue in 1985, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist lamented that "unfortunately the Establishment Clause has been expressly freighted with Jefferson's misleading metaphor for nearly 40 years." Defenders of the metaphor responded immediately: "despite its detractors and despite its leaks, cracks and its archways, the wall ranks as one of the mightiest monuments of constitutional government in this nation."

Given the gravity of the issues involved in the debate over the wall metaphor, it is surprising that so little effort has been made to go behind the printed text of the Danbury Baptist letter to unlock its secrets. Jefferson's handwritten draft of the letter is held by the Library's Manuscript Division. Inspection reveals that nearly 30 percent of the draft -- seven of 25 lines -- was deleted by the president prior to publication. Jefferson indicated his deletions by circling several lines and noting in the left margin that they were to be excised. He inked out several words in the circled section and a few words elsewhere in the draft. He also inked out three entire lines following the circled section. Click here to see the text of the final letter.
Like I said, you endorse the godless atheist position, allowing abortion. It doesn't matter how you try to dress it up and make it something else. And this issue proves it is impossible to separate church and state without creating an atheist state.
 
15th post
feigning ignorance doesn't work. Islam is on a 100 year jihad to rule the entire world. They are succeeding due to ignorance such as yours. Why do you think they established muslim enclaves in MIchigan and Minnesota if not to send muslims to the US congress. They are winning due to ignorance such as yours.
I am a non-believer in all religions and agree with you that America and other countries should not import Islam. Now what?
 
Sure, Private Catholic School.
I went to a Catholic school. They taught all 7 solid subjects and were stern, and you had to learn. At that time, nuns were the teachers. There are not enough nuns today, so now lay people teach. I'm sure they still have catechism class, but even that may be optional in today's more secular societies.

But let me ask. As long as they provide a solid education, what is the problem?

For the record, Catholicism is a cult, as are all religions, so please don't try to slam me as some religious nut job.
 
I went to a Catholic school. They taught all 7 solid subjects and were stern, and you had to learn. At that time, nuns were the teachers. There are not enough nuns today, so now lay people teach. I'm sure they still have catechism class, but even that may be optional in today's more secular societies.

But let me ask. As long as they provide a solid education, what is the problem?

For the record, Catholicism is a cult, as are all religions, so please don't try to slam me as some religious nut job.
Not at all…my point to Mac1958 was that he could picture a Christian society. The Catholic school system did it everyday. And most attending will tell us that they are better off for it.
 
Back
Top Bottom