Seawytch
Information isnt Advocacy
So, there are no politicians trying to legislate their religious beliefs?
Example. The right wants the ability for businesses to discriminate based on their religious beliefs. They want it to be OK for a Pharmacist to refuse to fill a prescription if that prescription is against his "religion".
a. So you object to enforcing the commandment against murder?
b. You view is that forcing conscientious objectors to bake a cake is more important than liberty?
c. One must admit the consistency you folks stick to going back to your revolution in 1905.
I knew you wouldn't understand that, RealDumb....you're a government school grad.
A. Restrictions on murder are found in all religions and predates Christianity by hundreds, if not thousands, of years.
B. So you're going to get Title II of the Civil Rights act repealed so bakers don't have to bake for sinful interracial couples?
"B. So you're going to get Title II of the Civil Rights act repealed so bakers don't have to bake"...a cake
I sure hope you're right.....of course, unlike you, I don't believe in slavery.
Any normal person must laugh at the claims of the gay couple who were deprived of their cake:
"The lesbian couple had filed a claim with the state, stating that the Kleins’ refusal to bake them a cake had caused them to suffer from 88 symptoms of mental anguish including “doubt,” “surprise,” “uncertainty,” “worry” and a “dislike of going to work.”
....their case wasn’t even tried by a judge from the Oregon judiciary; it was tried by a bureaucrat from the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, who ruled that the Kleins owed the lesbian couple, Rachel Cryer and Laurel Bowman, $135,000 in damages.
Although Rachel Cryer could have easily found another cake supplier, the Oregon government deemed it important to make an example of the Kleins.
According to the official catechism of the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, a Christian couple’s right to religious freedom takes a backseat to a lesbian couple’s right to a cake."
What Will Happen to Religious Freedom?
Shall we review what 'rights' are in a free country?
Here is what ‘rights’ are.
- A right is something an individual has by virtue of being human.
- Human beings are the only entities that have rights.
- Rights belong to each human individually.
- Rights are exercised by individuals, and are not given nor ascribed by any person of group, especially governments.
- Rights are voluntary, in that individuals may choose whether to either exercise them or to ignore them.
- Individual cannot have a right that infringes upon or diminishes the rights of others.
6. To be clear, ‘benefits’ such as education, shelter, or a job require resources from somewhere else, and therefore, cannot be given or protected without restricting another’s right to the property of his hands or mind.
Why did you selectively edit the question? Title II of the Civil Rights Act does not require the Klein's bake a cake for gay people, local law does. You know, states rights stuff. Title II of the CRA "forces" people to make cakes for sinful interracial couples. Are you getting that repealed or not?